바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.43 No.3

Citation Share

A Study on University Researchers’ Data Management Practices

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society / Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, (P)2466-2542;
2012, v.43 no.3, pp.433-455
https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.43.3.201209.433

(2012). A Study on University Researchers’ Data Management Practices. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 43(3), 433-455, https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.43.3.201209.433

Abstract

This study examined research data management practices from the perspectives of university researchers. A survey was conducted for principal investigators of projects in universities selected to be funded by National Research Foundation in 2010 and 2011. Predicated on the analysis of 131 survey responses, there was a great difference in types of research data between Humanities & Social Science fields and Science, Medicine and Engineering fields. Most respondents added value of their data by linking to other types of information or combining data from other sources. For storing data, PC or portable media were generally employed, and around 80% of respondents saw their data having a useful life under 10 years. Data was shared within research team and with outside researchers who requested data. The percentage of respondents who have reused data was higher than that of respondents who have shared data. In order to obtain data for reuse, the majority of respondents drew data from published articles, or contacted data creators. In most cases, mechanisms for managing data did not exist in projects or universities where respondents belong. Since the level of satisfaction with long-term preservation and metadata description of research data was found to be low, it was necessary to develop data archiving services to support the data management procedures.

keywords
Research data, University researchers, Data management, Data sharing, Data reuse, 연구데이터, 대학 연구자, 데이터 관리, 데이터 공유, 데이터 재이용

Reference

1.

김은정. 연구데이터 수집에 영향을 미치는 요인 분석. 박사학위논문, 중앙대학교 대학원 기록관리학과 기록물관리학 전공, 2012.

2.

신영란. 인문사회 연구데이터 아카이브의 발전방향에 관한 연구, 석사학위논문, 이화여자대학교 정책과학대학원 기록관리 전공, 2012.

3.

American Council on Learned Societies (ACLS). Our Cultural Commonwealth: the Final Report of the American Council of Learned Societies commission on Cyberinfrastructure for the Humanities and Social Sciences. 2006. <www.acls.org/cyberinfrastructure/OurCulturalCommonwealth.pdf> [cited 2012. 8.18].

4.

Beagrie, Neil, Robert Beagrie, and Ian Rowlands. “Research Data Preservation and Access: The Views of Researchers,” Ariadne, Vol.60(2009). <http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue60/beagrie-et-al/> [cited 2012.8.18]

5.

Borgman, Christine L., Jillian C. Wallis, and Noel Enyedy. “Building Digital Libraries for Scientific Data: An Exploratory Study of Data Practices in Habitat Ecology.” Lecture Notes in Computer Science, No.4172(2006), pp.170-183.

6.

Borgman, Christine L.. “Data, Disciplines, and Scholarly Publishing.” Learned Publishing, Vol.21(2008), pp.29-38.

7.

Borgman, Christine L. “The Digital Future is Now: A Call to Action for the Humanities.” Digital Humanities Quarterly, Vol.3, No.4(2009). <http://digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/3/4/000077/000077.html>[cited 2012.8.18]

8.

Carlson, Samuelle and Ben Anderson. “What are Data? The Many Kinds of Data and Their Implications for Data Re-Use,” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol.12, No.2(2007). <http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue2/carlson.html> [cited 2012.8.18].

9.

Faniel, Ixchel M. and Trond E. Jacobsen. “Reusing Scientific Data: How Earthquake Engineering Researchers Assess the Reusability of Colleagues’ Data.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Vol.19(2010), pp.355-375.

10.

Griffith, Aaron. “The Publication of Research Data: Researcher Attitudes and Behaviour,” International Journal of Data Curation, Vol.1, No.4(2009), pp.46-56.

11.

Hedstrom, Margaret and Jinfang Niu. “Incentives for Data Producers to Create "Archive-Ready" Data: Implications for Archives and Records Management,” Proceedings of 2008 Society of American Archivist Research Forum. 2008. <http://www2.archivists.org/sites/all/files/M-HedstromJ-Niu-SAA-ResearchPaper-2008.pdf> [cited 2012.8.18.]

12.

Higgins, Sarah. “The DCC curation lifecycle model,” International Journal of Digital Curation, Vol.3, No.1(June 2008), pp.134-140.

13.

Hey, Tony and Anne E. Trefethen. “Cyberinfrastructure and e-Science.” Science, Vol.308(May2005), pp.134-140.

14.

Humphrey, Charles. e-Science and the life cycle of research, 2006.<http://datalib.library.ualberta.ca/~humphrey/lifecycle-science060308.doc> [cited 2012.8.18].

15.

Karasti, Helena, Karen S. Baker, and Eija Halkola. “Enriching the Notion of Data Curation In E-Science: Data Managing and Information Infrastructuring in the Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) Network,” Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Vol.15(2006), pp.321-358.

16.

Lyon, Liz. “eBank UK: Building the Links between Research Data, Scholarly Communication and Learning,” Ariadne, Vol.36, 2003. <http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue36/lyon/> [cited 2012.8.18]

17.

National Science Foundation (NSF), Revolutionizing Science and Engineering through cyberinfrastructure: Report of the National Science Foundation blue-ribbon advisory panel on cyberinfrastructure.(Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, 2003).

18.

Perry, Carol Marie. “Archiving of Publicly Funded Research Data: A Survey of Canadian Researchers,” Government Information Quarterly, Vol.25(2008), pp.133-148.

19.

Swan, Alma and Sheridan Brown. To share or not to share: Publication and quality assurance of research data outputs. A report commissioned by the Research Information Network, 2008. <http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/266742/> [cited 2012.8.18].

20.

Tenopir, Carol, Suzie Allard, Kimberly Douglass, Arsev Umur Aydinoglu, Lei Wu, Eleanor Read, Maribeth Manoff, and Mike Frame. “Data Sharing by Scientists: Practices and Perceptions,” PLoS ONE, Vol.6, No.6(June 2011). <http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0021101> [cited 2012.8.18].

21.

Whyte, Angus, Dominic Job, Stephen Giles, and Stephen Lawrie. Meeting Curation Challenges in a Neuroimaging Group. International Journal of Digital Curation, Vol.3, No.1(2008), pp.171-181.

22.

Zimmerman, Ann S. “New Knowledge from Old Data: The Role of Standards in the Sharing and Reuse of Ecological Data,” Science, Technology & Human Values, Vol.33, No.5(2008), pp.631-652.

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society

e-Submission OA Policy