바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

A Study on Faceted Navigation of the Public Libraries

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society / Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, (P)2466-2542;
2014, v.45 no.1, pp.339-358
https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.45.1.201403.339

Abstract

This study aims to construct faceted navigation useful for domestic users through analyzing English and North American public libraries’ faceted navigations. The 19 domestic libraries and the 12 foreign libraries has been chosen for analyzing their unique facets. Although the domestic libraries ‘facets had no differences to the domestic universities’ facets, the North American libraries have their unique facets. Those facets are target audience, genre, library list, user tags, and availability related facets and the facets are mainly to improve user’s usability in using library catalog. Adopting the facets in domestic public libraries by using Fixed-Length data elements of KORMARC, domestic public libraries will enhance usability of library users in retrieving library materials.

keywords
Faceted navigation, Public library, Facet, Convenience in using catalog, Usability of library users, 패싯 내비게이션, 공공도서관, 패싯, 목록 사용에서의 편의성, 도서관 이용자의 사용성

Reference

1.

구중억, 곽승진. “차세대OPAC의인터페이스와기능에관한연구.” 한국비블리아학회지, 18권, 제2호(2010. 6), pp.61-88.

2.

도태현, 정영미. “대학도서관의차세대OPAC 기능채택과확산현황.” 한국도서관 정보학회지, 제 44권, 제2호(2013. 6), pp.197-215.

3.

박지영. “KDC 조기표를 이용한 국내서의 패싯 내비게이션 기능 개선 방안.” 한국비블리아학회지,제23권, 제1호(2012. 3), pp.47-63.

4.

심 경. “차세대도서관목록의사례: AquaBrowser,” 도서관문화, 제49권, 제10호(2008), pp.48-56.

5.

심 경. “차세대 도서관 목록의 사례: WorldCat Local.” 도서관문화, 제49권, 제11호(2008), pp.54-61.

6.

유영준. “차세대도서관목록에서의패싯내비게이션에관한연구.” 정보관리학회지, 제28권, 제3호 (2011. 9), pp.13-30.

7.

유영준. “국내 대학도서관 OPAC의 패싯 내비게이션 분석에 관한 연구.” 정보관리학회지, 제30권,제2호(2013. 6), pp.189-205.

8.

윤정옥. “차세대 도서관 목록 사례의 고찰.” 한국도서관정보학회지, 제41권, 제1호(2010. 3), pp.1-28.

9.

조미라, 오삼균. “패싯기반 네비게이션활용에 관한연구: 서울소재 대학도서관 홈페이지를중심으로.” 제19회 한국정보관리학회 학술대회 논문집, 2010, pp.57-62.

10.

하은하, 이성숙. “공공도서관 OPAC 인터페이스의 발전방안 연구.” 한국비블리아학회지, 제24권,제3호(2013. 9), pp.5-27.

11.

Hall, C. E. “Facet-based library catalogs: A survey of the landscape.” Proceedings of the 74th Annual Meeting of ASIS&T. (2011), New Orleans, Louisiana.

12.

Jennifer Bowen. “Metadata to support next-generation library resource discovery: Lessons from the eXtensible catalog.” Information Technology and Libraries, Vol.27, No.2(2008), pp.6-19.

13.

Kristin Antelman, Emily Lynema and Andrew K. Pace. “Toward a twenty-first century library catalog.” Information Technology and Libraries, Vol.25, No.3(2006), pp.128-139.

14.

Sharon Q. Yang and Melissa A. Hofmann. “Next generation or current generation?: A study of the OPACs of 260 academic libraries in the USA and Canada.” Library Hi Tech, Vol.29, No.2(2010), pp.266-300.

15.

Tanja Mercun and Maja Zumer. “New generation of catalogues for the new generation of users: A comparison of six library catalogues.” Electronic Library and Information Systems, Vol.42, No.3(2008), pp.243-261.

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society