바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

A Study on the Application of the FRBR Model to Legislation

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society / Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, (P)2466-2542;
2014, v.45 no.4, pp.365-390
https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.45.4.201412.365

  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

This study intend to find the application methods of the FRBR model about legislation by analyzing a law life cycle from the enactment to the amendment and abolition of legislation and the type of the change after abolition. The legislation is the work as an aggregate entity consisting legal provisions and each provision is also the work. They are in the Whole-to-Part relation. The legislation has a effect by being published in the official gazette, and the updated text or the translated text is not the official version. Even if the name of the legislation is changed, it is treated as the same entity when it is not abolished and the simple rectifying text expressed in the official gazette is also legally valid. The Libraries Act has been replaced by the Libraries Act(old version), the Libraries Promotion Act, the Libraries and Reading Promotion Act and the Libraries Act(new version) in the order named, and it can be bounded into a superwork. For these examples, we provided the application method of FRBR model and suggested the actual application cases regarding Work, Expression, Manifestation and Item which are in Group 1 of FRBR model for the Libraries Act.

keywords
FRBR 모형, 법령, 법령 라이프사이클, 연혁법령, 도서관법, FRBR 모형의 적용, FRBR model, Legislation, Law life cycle, Libraries act, Adaptation of the FRBR models

Reference

1.

두산백과사전 홈페이지. <http://www.doopedia.co.kr/> [인용 2014. 8. 5].

2.

법제처 국가법령정보센터 홈페이지. <http://www.law.go.kr> [인용 2014. 8. 5].

3.

법제처. 2009. 알기 쉬운 법령 정비기준. 제2판. 서울: 법제처.

4.

안전행정부 대한민국전자관보 홈페이지. <http://gwanbo.korea.go.kr> [인용 2014. 8. 5].

5.

전경근. 2004. 법정보학강의. 서울: 박영사.

6.

한국법제연구원. 2008. 법령 온톨로지시스템 구축에 관한 연구. 서울: 한국법제연구원.

7.

Arlene, G. T. 2007. “An Introduction to Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records.” nderstanding FRBR: What It Is and How It Will Affect Our Retrieval Tools. Libraries Unlimited, an imprint of Greenwood Publishing Group.

8.

Boer, A., Winkels, R. and Vitali, F. 2008. “MetaLex XML and the Legal Knowledge Interchange Format.” 21-41. In Casanovas, P. et al. (Eds). Computable Models of the Law, LNAI 4884. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

9.

Breuker, J., Hoekstra, R., Boer, A. and van den Berg, K. 2007. OWL Ontology of Basic Legal Concept(LKIF-Core) Deliverable 1.4. Information Society Technologies.

10.

Fattahi, R. 1996. Relevance of cataloguing principles to the on-line environment: an historical and analytical study. Theses. University of New South Wales, Sydney.

11.

IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. 1998. Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: Final Report. Munchen: KG Saur. <http://www.ifla.org/files/cataloguing/frbr/frbr.pdf> [cited 2014. 8. 5].

12.

Lima, J. A. O. 2007. An Adaptation of the FRBR Model to Legal Norms. <http://www.e -p-a-p.com/dlib/9788883980466/art4.pdf> [cited 2014. 8. 5].

13.

O'neill, E. 2005. Relational Model for Aggregates. IFLA FRBR Workshop. <http://www.o clc.org/content/dam/research/activities/frbr/frbr-workshop/presentations/ONeill -Aggregartes.ppt?urlm=161350> [cited 2014. 9. 15].

14.

Vellucci, S. L. 2007. “FRBR and Music.” Arlene, G. T. Understanding FRBR: What It Is and How It Will Affect Our Retrieval Tools. Libraries Unlimited, an imprint of Greenwood Publishing Group.

15.

VTLS. 2004. Virtua Ils–Integrated Libraty System: FRBR Cataloging User's Guide (Version 43.1). <www.viks.sk/digitus/kis3g/WORD/43frbr.doc> [cited 2014. 8. 10].

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society