바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society

  • P-ISSN2466-2542
  • KCI

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.46 No.1

Citation Share

A Study about Scholarly Impact Measurement through Altmetrics

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society / Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, (P)2466-2542;
2015, v.46 no.1, pp.65-81
https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.46.1.201503.65

(2015). A Study about Scholarly Impact Measurement through Altmetrics. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 46(1), 65-81, https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.46.1.201503.65

Abstract

Altmetircs is the new method to measure social impact of research result which couldn't be found by traditional way, through measuring how much research result is reacting to social media. As academic communication has been diverse and OA repository which can preserve diverse type of article has been activated, New paradigm that measure impact of articles through multifaceted and complex way has been started. This study considers background, status of application, pros and cons about altmetircs. And by using Impactstory which is open source based tool, analyses the research output about digital library of Korea, china and japan which is published in international journal. Besides, analyses correlation between Altmetricss and citation rates. As results, “saved” shows higher than “cited” in library research analysis, it means that even though articles are not cited by followed study, there are a lot of articles that has saved in reference management tool. And positive correlation(r = 0.718) exists between “saved” and “cited”, it can be inferred that Altmetricss complement the bibliometrics based evaluation system. Meanwhile, Korean researches are saved more in reference management tool than other countries.

keywords
Altmetrics, Bibliometrics, Impact factor, ImpactStory, Mendeley, Altmetrics, 연구 영향력, 인용계수, ImpactStory, Mendeley

Reference

1.

國立國會圖書館. 2012. 米ピッツバーグ大学図書館、ソーシャルメディア等を利用した研究成果指標を提供するPlum Analytics社のサービスを初導入. <http://current.ndl.go.jp/node/21150> [引用 2014. 10. 10].

2.

林 和弘, 2013. “研究論文の影響度を測定する新しい動き : 論文単位で即時かつ多面的な測定を可能とするAltmetrics.” 科学技術動向. 3-4: 20-29.

3.

Altmetirc.com Home page. <http://www.altmetric.com/whatwedo.php> [cited 2014. 11. 10].

4.

Bornmann, Lutz. 2014. Alternative metrics in scientometrics: A meta-analysis of research into three Altmetricss. <http://arxiv.org/abs/1407.8010> [cited 2014. 12. 10].

5.

Ceek.jp Hompage. <http://www.ceek.jp/> [cited 2015. 1. 10].

6.

Eysenbach, Gunther. 2011. “Can Tweets Predict Citations? Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact.”Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13(4): e123.

7.

Exlibris Initiative blog. <http://initiatives.exlibrisgroup.com/2012/12/Altmetrics-on-primo.html> [cited 2014. 11. 10].

8.

Galligan, Finbar and Sharon Dyas-Correia. 2013. “Altmetrics: Rethinking the Way We Measure”. Serials Review, 39(1): 56-61.

9.

Hammarfelt, Björn. 2014. “Using Altmetrics for Assessing Research Impact in the Humanities.” Scientometrics, 101(2): 1419-1430.

10.

ImpactStory blog. <http://blog.impactstory.org/4-things-librarians-Altmetrics/> [cited 2014. 12. 10].

11.

Konkiel Stacy and Dave Scherer. 2013. “New Opportunities for Repositories in the Age of Altmetrics”. Bulletin of the ASISandT, 39(4): 22-26.

12.

Lapinski, Scott, Heather Piwowar and Jason Priem. 2013. “Riding the Crest of the Altmetrics Wave How Librarians can Help Prepare Faculty for the Next Generation of Research Impact Metrics”. College & Research Libraries New, 74(6): 292-300.

13.

Liu, Jean. 2014. Bringing Altmetrics to Institutions, 2014 ALA Annual Conference,<http://libraryconnect.elsevier.com/sites/default/files/Jean_Liu_June_2014.pdf> [cited 2014. 12. 12].

14.

Mounce Ross, 2013. “Open Access and Altmetrics: Distinct but Complementary”. Bulletin of the ASISandT, 39(4): 14-17.

15.

Neylon, Cameron and Shirley Wu. 2009. “Article-Level Metrics and the Evolution of Scie ntific Impact”. PLOS Biology, 7(11): e1000242.

16.

NISO. 2014. NISO Altmetrics Standards Project White Paper Draft. <http://www.niso.org/apps/group_public/download.php/13295/niso_Altmetrics_white_paper_draft_v4.pdf> [cited 2015. 1. 12].

17.

Mohammadi, Ehsan and Mike Thelwall. 2013. “Mendeley Readership Altmetrics for the Social Sciences and Humanities: Research Evaluation and Knowledge Flows”. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(8):1627-1638.

18.

Roemer, Robin chin and Rachel Borchardt. 2013. “From bibliometrics to Altmetricss A Changing Scholarly Landscape”. College & ; Research Libraries News, 73(10):596-600.

19.

Warne, Verity. 2014. Wiley Introduces Altmetrics to its Open Access Journals, <http://exchanges.wiley.com/blog/2014/03/19/wiley-introduces-Altmetrics-to-its-open-access-journals/> [cited 2014. 12. 10].

20.

Wiley. 2013. Wiley Trial Alternative Metrics on Subscription and Open Access Article. <http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/PressRelease/pressReleaseId-108763.html> [cited 2014. 12. 12].

21.

Zahedi, Zohreh, Rodrigo Costas, and Paul Wouters. 2014. “How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of 'alternative metrics”. Scientometrics, 101(2): 1491-1513.

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society

e-Submission OA Policy