바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

A Study on the perception and improvement for the CIP of the public librarians

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society / Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, (P)2466-2542;
2016, v.47 no.2, pp.157-173
https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.47.2.201606.157



Abstract

This study investigates 185 public librarians' perceptions, satisfactions score and loyalty for CIP program operated by the National Library of Korea. The 172 (93.0%) librarians have perceived about the CIP, and 98(57.0%) librarians make use of the CIP at their works. They were relatively high perceptions on the service quality (3.50), satisfaction (3.71), and loyalty (3.72) for the CIP on the Likert 5-point scale. This study also tested the quality of service, satisfaction and loyalty using Structured Equation Model(SEM) models. Research findings show that CIP data quality had a statistically meaningful positive impact on user satisfaction and user satisfaction had a meaningful positive impact on loyalty.

keywords
CIP, Cataloging In Publication, 출판예정도서목록, CIP-서비스품질, CIP-고객만족도, CIP-충성도, 구조방정식모형, CIP, Cataloging in publication, CIP-Service quality, CIP-Satisfaction, CIP-Loyalty, SEM

Reference

1.

국립중앙도서관. 2006. 『국립중앙도서관 연보 2006』. 서울: 국립중앙도서관. <http://www.nl.go.kr/upload/nl/pds/research_data/year_2006/seji_report.html> [인용 2015. 12. 9].

2.

김종수, 오동근, 최성구. 2015. 『출판예정도서목록(CIP) 활용도 제고 방안 연구』. 서울 : 국립중앙도서관, 11-1371029-000116-01.

3.

오동근, 여지숙. 2001. 한국형 CIP 제도의 도입방안에 관한 연구. 『한국문헌정보학회지』, 35(2):59-74.

4.

오동근 외. 2009. 공공도서관 고객만족도(LCSI) 모형개발 및 측정. 『한국도서관․정보학회지』, 40(2): 267-286.

5.

우종필. 2012. 『우종필 교수의 구조방정식모델 개념과 이해: Amos 4.0-20.0 공용』. 서울: 한나래아카데미.

6.

장윤금. 2007. 공공도서관의 e-서비스 품질평가와 이용자 만족도에 관한 연구. 『한국문헌정보학회지』, 41(4): 315-329.

7.

황재영, 이응봉. 2010. 디지털도서관의 서비스 품질 측정모형과 지표 개발. 『한국도서관․정보학회지』, 41(1): 121-147.

8.

British Library. 2016. The Cataloguing-in-Publication Programme. <http://www.bl.uk/bibliographic/cip.html> [cited 2016. 5. 18].

9.

Cello, John and Beacher Wiggins. 2004. Survey of National CIP Programs: Results and Analysis. <http://archive.ifla.org/VII/s12/pubs/s12-Survey-National-CIP-Programs.pdf> [cited 2015. 11. 19].

10.

Debus-López, Karl E. et al. 2013. “The Electronic Cataloging in Publication Cataloging Partnership Program: A Model for Cooperative Cataloging for the Twenty-First Century.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 51: 25-54.

11.

Deutsche National Bibliothek. 2015a. New Release Service. <http://www.dnb.de/EN/Service/DigitaleDienste/ND/nd_node.html> [cited 2015. 12. 8].

12.

Deutsche National Bibliothek. 2015b. Publisher notification procedure - frequently aske d questions (FAQ). <http://www.dnb.de/EN/Header/Hilfe/meldeverfahrenFaq.html> [cited 2015. 12. 8].

13.

Library of Congress. 2015. The new Cataloging in Publication (CIP) Data Block to beimplemented by October 1, 2015. <http://www.loc.gov/publish/cip/news> [cited 2015. 12. 8].

14.

Library of Congress. 2016. ECIP Cataloging Partnership Program Expands Membership Requirement to include NACO Member Institutions. <http://www.loc.gov/publish/cip/news> [cited 2016. 5. 18].

15.

Library and Archives Canada. 2015. Cataloging in Publication. <http://www.bac-lac.gc.ca/eng/services/cip/Pages/cip.aspx> [cited 2015. 12. 8].

16.

IFLA. 2012. Finnish National Bibliography. <http://www.ifla.org/node/5125> [cited 2015. 12. 8].

17.

IFLA Working Group on Guidelines for National Bibliographies. 2008. Guidelines for Nat ional Bibliographies in the Electronic Age. <http://archive.ifla.org/VII/s12/guidelines-national-bibliographies-electronic-age.pdf> [cited 2015. 12. 8].

18.

National Library of the Czech Republic. 2012. Cataloging in publications. <http://www.en.nkp.cz/services/services-for/cataloguing-in-publication/cip> [cited 2015. 12. 8].

19.

Prasuraman, A., Valarie A. Zeithaml and Arvind Malhotra. 2005. “E-S-QUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Assessing Electronic Service Quality.” Journal of Service research, 7(3): 213-233.

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society