바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Progressive Librarian 'Zoia M. Horn' and Her Library Freedom Ideologies

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society / Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, (P)2466-2542;
2016, v.47 no.4, pp.43-68
https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.47.4.201612.43

  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Uncovering ideological trends and varieties embedded in contemporary progressive librarianship, the depth and breath of the librarians’ thoughts should be more expandable than before. That is the purpose of the study. To accomplish the purpose, this study analyzed key ideologies of American progressive librarian Zoia M. Horn(1918-2014) as reviewing carefully her biography with the inductive approach for qualitative data analysis. As a result, author suggests that the core values of Z.M. Horn’s library freedom ideologies have identified as equality, intellectual freedom, and pacifism. In addition, the ingredients of these core ideologies also were identified.

keywords
Library ideology, Zoia M. Horn, Library freedom, Progressive librarian, Equality, Intellectual freedom, Pacifism, 도서관 사상, 조이아 혼, 진보사서, 도서관 자유, 평등, 지적자유, 인류평화

Reference

1.

김선호. 2014. 현대도서관직 중립성에 나타난 인권사상의 분석적 고찰. 『충남대 사회과학연구』, 25(4): 455-472.

2.

노영희. 2012. 디지털도서관서비스기록과 이용자프라이버시에 관한 연구. 『정보관리학회지』, 29(3): 187-214.

3.

정현태. 2000. 우리나라 공공도서관의 지적자유에 대한 사례연구. 『한국문헌정보학회지』, 34(1):243-264.

4.

ALA. 2010. Intellectual freedom manual(8th ed.). Chicago, American Library Association, 17.

5.

ALA. 1996. “ALA Policy Manual, B.2.1 Library Bill of Rights,” <http://www.ala.org/aboutala/governance/policymanual/updatedpolicymanual/section2/53intellfreedom#B.2.1> [cited 2016. 11. 10].

6.

Byrne, Alex. 1999. “Libraries and Democracies.”IFLA, Keynote Paper for Seminar on Libraries and Democracy, Stockholm. <http://archive.ifla.org/faife/papers/others/byrne3.htm> [cited 2016. 11. 10].

7.

Eryaman, Mustafa Yunus. 2010. “The Public Library as a Space for Democratic Empowerment: Henry Giroux, Radical Democracy, and Border Pedagogy,”in Critical theory for Library and Information Science: Exploring the Social from across the Disciplines, ed. by G.J. Leckie, L.M. Given, and J.E. Buschman. Santa Barbara: Libraries Unlimited, 131-141.

8.

Hoffman, Anna Lauren. 2016. “Privacy, Intellectual Freedom, and Self-Respect:Technological and Philosophical Lessons for Library.”Perspectives on Libraries as Institutions of Human Rights and Social Justice. Advances in Librarian, 41. ed. by U. Gorham, N.G. Tayor, and P,T. Jaeger. WA, UK: Emerald, 49-70.

9.

Horn, Zoia M. 1995. Zoia!: memoirs of Zoia Horn, battler for the people’s right to know. N. Carolina: McFarland. <http://www.archive.org/details/zoiamemoirsofzio00horn> [cited 2016. 11. 10].

10.

Jaeger, P.T., Berrot, J.C., Kodama, C.M., Katz, S.M., & DeCoster, E.J. 2011. “Describing and measuring the value of public libraries: The growth of the Internet and the evolution of library value.”First Modnda, 11(7). <http://www.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/vieArticle/3756/3074> [cited 2016. 11. 10].

11.

Leckie, G. and John Buschman. 2010. “Introduction: The Necessity for Theoretically Informed Critique in Library and Information Science(LIS).”Critical Theory for Library and Information Science: Exploring the Social from across the Disciplines. ed. by G.L. Leckie, L.S. Given, and J.E. Buschman. Santa Barbara: Libraries Unlimited, vii-xxii.

12.

Peña McCook, Kathleen de la. 2014. “Librarians as Wikipedians: From Library History to Librarianship and Human Rights.”Progressive Librarian: A Journal for Critical Studies and Progressive Politics in Librarianship, 42: 61-81.

13.

Samek, Toni. 2007. Librarianship and Human Rights: A twenty-first century guide. Oxford: Chandos.

14.

Samek, Tomi. 2016. “Critical Reflection on Librarianship and Human Rights: A Book and Continuing Endeavor.”Perspectives on Libraries as Institutions of Human Rights and Social Justice. Advances in Librarian, 41. ed. by U. Gorham, N.G. Tayor, and P,T. Jaeger. WA, UK: Emerald, 245-264.

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society