Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
- P-ISSN2466-2542
- KCI
Article Contents
- 2024 (Vol.55)
- 2023 (Vol.54)
- 2022 (Vol.53)
- 2021 (Vol.52)
- 2020 (Vol.51)
- 2019 (Vol.50)
- 2018 (Vol.49)
- 2017 (Vol.48)
- 2016 (Vol.47)
- 2015 (Vol.46)
- 2014 (Vol.45)
- 2013 (Vol.44)
- 2012 (Vol.43)
- 2011 (Vol.42)
- 2010 (Vol.41)
- 2009 (Vol.40)
- 2008 (Vol.39)
- 2007 (Vol.38)
- 2006 (Vol.37)
- 2005 (Vol.36)
- 2004 (Vol.35)
- 2003 (Vol.34)
- 2002 (Vol.33)
- 2001 (Vol.32)
- 2000 (Vol.31)
- 1999 (Vol.30)
A Proposal for Creating Task-Centric Application Profile: Utilization of Task Model for Suitable Selection and Combination of Metadata Schema Properties
Abstract
Metadata standard is very important element to describe a digital resource in the records lifecycle. Metadata standard is influenced by the purpose and content of tasks that are performed to a resource. But it does not reflect a task-centric viewpoint to cover the whole records-lifecycle because metadata is defined and designed from a resource-centric viewpoint. In other words, to cover the whole records-lifecycle using metadata, it is necessary to properly select and combine metadata property from a task-centric viewpoint. Therefore, we proposed a task-centric metadata application profile that can combine and select appropriate metadata properties according to requirements and tasks performed on resource.
- keywords
- Application profile, Interoperability, Mapping, Metadata property, Metadata schema, Records lifecycle, Task, Task-Centric Application profile, Task model, 기록생애주기, 매핑, 메타데이터 속성, 메타데이터 스키마, 상호운용성, 어플리케이션 프로파일, 업무, 업무중심의 어플리케이션 프로파일, 태스크, 태스크 모델
Reference
백재은. 2014. A Study on Feature Analysis of Archival Metadata Standards in the Records Lifecycle. 『한국문헌정보학회지』, 48(3): 71-111.
백재은, 스기모토 시게오. 2012. 메타데이터 상호운용성을 위한 기록관리 메타데이터 표준 분석. 『기록학연구』, 32: 127-176.
Baek, Jaeeun, Shigeo Sugimoto. 2010. Feature Analysis of Metadata Schemas for Records Management and Archives from the Viewpoint of Records Lifecycle. 『한국기록관리학회지』, 10(2): 75-99.
Baek, Jaeeun, Shigeo Sugimoto. 2011. “Facet Analysis of Archival Metadata Standards to Support Appropriate Selection, Combination and Use of Metadata Schemas.” In: Proceeding of International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, The Hague, Sep 2011. Netherlands, 1-11.
Tambouris. E. et al. 2007. “Metadata for digital collection of e-government resources.” The Electronic Library, 25(2): 176-192.
Chen, L.M. and Zeng, M.L.. 2006. Metadata Interoperability and Standardization - A Study of Methodology Part I. [cited 2018. 8. 15]. <http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june06/chan/06chan.html>.
Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (DCMI). 2007. Dublin Core Collection Description Application Profile. [cited 2018. 8. 15]. <http://dublincore.org/groups/collections/collection-application-profile/>.
Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (DCMI). 2012. Dublin Core Metadata Element Set, Version 1.1: Reference Description. [cited 2018. 8. 15]. <http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/>.
Haslhofer, Bernhard and Klas, Wolfgang. 2010. “A Survey of Techniques for Achieving Metadata Interoperability.” ACM Computing Surveys, 42(7): 1-37.
International Council on Archives (ICA). 2000. ISAD(G): General International Standard Archival Description, Second Edition. [cited 2018. 8. 15]. <https://www.ica.org/sites/default/files/CBPS_2000_Guidelines_ISAD%28G%29_Second-edition_EN.pdf>.
National Archives of Australia. 2010. AGLS Metadata Standard Part 2 Usage Guide – (Version 2.0). [cited 2018. 8. 15]. <http://www.agls.gov.au/pdf/AGLS%20Metadata%20Standard%20Part%202%20Usage%20Guide.PDF>.
National Archives of Australia. 2015. Australian Government Recordkeeping, Metadata Standard (AGRkMS). [cited 2018. 8. 15]. <http://www.naa.gov.au/Images/AGRkMS-Version-2.2-June-2015_tcm16-47131.pdf>.
The Library of Congress. 2015. PREMIS Data Dictionary for Preservation Metadata. [cited 2018. 8. 15]. <http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/v3/premis-3-0-final.pdf>.
- Downloaded
- Viewed
- 0KCI Citations
- 0WOS Citations