open access
메뉴
open access
메뉴
ISSN : 1229-0688
This study was aimed to investigate experienced supervisors’ supervision performance processes and related factors. Ten experienced supervisors were interviewed and their responses were analyzed through CQR. Six domains and 40 categories were revealed from analysis of interview contents. The supervision performance processes indicate structuring the supervision. Supervision contents mean that the supervisors focus on the supervision. The methods to conveying supervision contents were how supervisors deliver their feedback to supervisees. Supervisory relationship stands for the relationship with supervisors and supervisees. These four domains were essential factors of the supervision performance. Professional competences of supervisors interact with essential factors of supervision performances and lead to supervision outcomes. By exploring structuring the supervision processes, supervision contents, the methods to conveying supervision contents to supervisees, and developmental tasks of supervisor’s professional competences, the study provides fundamental data of supervision performances and presents the criteria of evaluation.
김경실 (1999). 효과적인 슈퍼비전. 인간이해, 20, 서강대학교 학생생활상담연구소.
김계현 (1992). 상담교육 방법으로서의 개인수퍼비전 모델에 관한 복수사례연구. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 4, 19-53.
김지연 (2008). 국내의 상담 수퍼비전 연구 고찰. 한국놀이치료학회지, 11(4), 1-22.
문수정, 김계현 (2000). 상담수퍼비전 교육내용요구 분석: 상담자의 경력수준을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 12(1), 1-18.
방기연 (2006). 상담심리사의 수퍼비전 경험에대한 질적 분석. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및심리치료, 18(2), 233-254.
소수연, 장성숙 (2011). 효과적인 수퍼비전 요소에 관한 수퍼바이저의 지각 연구. 상담학연구, 12(3), 1051-1067.
손은정 (2010). 수퍼비전에 대한 질적 연구의동향과 과제. 한국놀이치료학회지, 13(3), 1-21.
손은정, 유성경, 강지연, 임영선 (2006). 수퍼비전 작업 동맹과 상담자 경력 수준이 역할어려움과 수퍼비전 만족도에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 18(4), 695-711.
손진희 (2004). 수퍼바이저 행동 분석을 통한효과적인 수퍼비전 요소 연구. 상담학연구, 5(2), 243-261.
송은화, 정남운 (2005). 수퍼비전 교육내용 요구도와 실태, 만족도 연구: 숙련과정에 있는 상담자를 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 17(2), 317-334.
신종임, 천성문, 이영순 (2004). 상담경력수준에 따른 개인상담 수퍼비전 교육내용 요구, 실제 및 만족도 분석. 한국동서정신과학회지, 7(1), 83-101.
심흥섭 (1998). 상담자 발달수준 평가에 관한 연구. 숙명여자대학교. 박사학위논문.
유성경, 김영빈, 김형수, 민경화, 이일화, 최한나 (2004). 수퍼비전 회기 평가도구 개발및 타당화 연구. 상담학연구, 5(2), 263-275.
유성경, 두경희, 김은하, 정여주 (2009). 수퍼비전 형식, 방법 및 내용에 대한 수련자 인식. 상담학연구, 1(4), 1907-1927.
이수현, 김봉환 (2009). 수퍼비전 기대 척도 개발 및 타당화. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 21(2), 417-437.
이승은 (2003). 초심상담자의 소집단 수퍼비전 경험에 관한 연구. 가톨릭대학교. 석사학위논문.
최한나 (2007). 좋은 수퍼비전 관계에 대한 수련자의 인식 차원. 서울대학교. 박사학위논문.
최해림 (1999). 상담자 교육과 수퍼비전의 현재. 대학생활연구, 17, 한양대학교 학생생활상담연구소.
홍지영 (2005). 수퍼바이저의 스타일이 수퍼비전과정과 성과에 미치는 영향. 홍익대학교. 박사학위논문.
Allen, D. J., Szollos, S. J., & Williams, B. E. (1986). Doctorial students’ comparative evaluations of best and worst psychotherapy supervision. Professional Psychology Research and Practice, 17, 91-99.
Bang, K., & Park, J. (2009). Korean supervisors’experiences in clinical supervision. The Counseling Psychologist, 37(8), 1042-1075.
Bernard, J. M. (1979). Supervision training: A discrimination model. Counselor Education and supervision. 19, 60-68.
Bernard, J. M., & Goodyear, R. K. (2009). Fundamentals of clinical supervision. MA:Needham Heights, Allyn & Bacon.
Carifio, M. S., & Hess, A. K. (1987). Who is the ideal supervisor? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 18, 244-250.
Freeman, B. (1985). The importance of feedback in clinical supervision: Implication for direct practice. The Clinical Supervisor, 3, 5-26.
Gazzola, N., & Teiault, A. (2007). Relational themes in counseling supervision: Broadening and narrowing processes. Canadian Journal of Counseling, 41, 228-243.
Hawkins, P., & Shohet, R. (1989). Supervision in the helping professions. Milton Keynes, UK:Open University Press.
Heppner, P. P., & Roehlke, H. J. (1984). Differences among sueprvisees at different level of training: Implications for a developmental model of supervision. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1, 76-90.
Hill, C. E., Thompson, B. J., & Nutt-Williams, E. (1997). A Guide to Conducting Consensual Qualitative Research. The Counseling Psychologist, 25(4), 517-572.
Hill, C. E., Knox, S., Thompson, B. J., Williams, E. N., Hess, S. A., & Ladany, N. (2005). Consensual Qualitative research: An Update. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 196-205.
Holloway, E. L. (1995). Clinical Supervision: A Systems Approach: A Systems Approach. Thousand Oak, CA. Sage.
Holloway, E. L., & Neufeldt, S. A. (1995). Supervision: Its contribution to treatment efficacy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63(2), 207-213.
Hutt, C. H., Scott, J., & King, M. (1983). A phenomenological study of supervisees’ positive and negative experiences in supervision. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, and Practice, 20, 118-123.
Ivey, A. E. (1971). Microcounseling innovations in interviewing training. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
Leddick, G. R., & Dye, H. A. (1987). Effective supervision as portrayed by trainee expectations and preference. Counselor Education and Supervision, 27, 139-153.
Lehrman-Waterman, D., & Ladany, N. (2001). Development and validation of the evaluation process within supervision inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48(2), 168-177.
Loganbill, C., Hardy, E., & Delworth, U. (1982). Supervision: a conceptual model. The Counseling Psychologist, 10, 3-42.
Magnuson, S., Wilcoxon, S. A., & Norem, K. (2000). A profile of lousy supervision:Experienced counselors’ perspectives. Counselor Education and Supervision, 39, 189-202.
Majcher, J., & Daniluk, J. C. (2009). The process of becoming a supervisor for students in a doctoral supervision training course. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 3(2), 63-71.
Martin, J. S., Goodyear, R. K., & Newton, F. B. (1987). Clinical supervision: An intensive case study. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 36, 395-400.
Neufeldt, S. A., & Nelson, M. L. (1999). when is counseling an appropriate and ethical supervision function? The Clinical Supervisor, 18, 125-135.
Rabinowitz, F. E., Heppner, P. P., & Roehlke, H. J. (1986). Descriptive study of process and outcome variables of supervision over time. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 33(3), 292-300.
Shanfield, S. B., Matthews, K. L., & Hetherly, V. (1993). What do excellent psychotherapy supervisors do? American Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 1081-1084.
Stoltenberg, C. D. (1981). Approaching supervision from a developmental perspective: The counselor complexity model. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28, 59-65.
Stoltenberg, C. D., & Delworth, U. (1987). Supervising counselors and therapists. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
Supervision Interest Network, Association for Counselor Education and Supervision. (1990). Standard for counseling supervisors. Journal of Counseling & Development, 69, 30-32.
Usher, C. H., & Borders, L. D. (1993). Practicing counselors’ preferences for supervisory style and supervisory emphases. Counselor education and Supervision, 33, 66-79.
Watkins, C. E. (1995). Psychotherapy supervision in the 1990s: Some observations and reflections. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 49(4), 568- 581.
Westefeld, J. S. (2009). Supervision of Psychotherapy: Models, issues, and recommendations, The Counseling Psychologist, 37(2), 296-316,
Worthen, V., & McNeill, B. W. (1996). A Phenomenological investigation of “good”supervision events. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43, 25-34.
Worthington, E. I., & Roehlke, H. J. (1979). Effective supervision and perceived by beginning counselor in training. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 26, 64-73.