바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

메뉴

초등학생들의 정서행동문제 평가를 위한투사적 그림검사에서 나타나는 성별효과의 오류

Fallacious Gender Differences on the Projective Drawing Test for Assessment of Emotional Behavioral Problems among Elementary School Children

Abstract

This study utilized projective drawing tests to identify whether the gender difference on a projective drawing test reflects actual differences of their psychological conditions between boys and girls. Despite their lack of objective scoring criteria, drawing tests have revealed that boys are more problematic both emotionally and behaviorally than girls. In this study, gender differences were examined via the Emotional-Behavioral Drawing Test. Six evaluators score the psychological conditions of 172 elementary school children. Positive automatic thought and emotional reactivity were measured as covariates. Results indicated there were statistically significant gender differences in drawing scores, but there were no significant effects of covariates. Given these results, it is plausible that no significant differences in psychological conditions existed between genders, even though boys may draw more psychologically problematic drawings than girls. It is suggested to apply gender criterion to score all types of drawing tests because boys and girls are different in drawings and expressing emotions.

keywords
성차, 투사적 그림검사, 정서행동문제, gender differences, projective drawing tests, emotional-behavioral problems

참고문헌

1.

Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Integrative Guide for the 1991 CBCL/4-18, YSR, and TRF Profiles. Burlington: Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont.

2.

Alter-Muri, S. B., & Vazzano, S. (2014). Gender typicality in children’s art development: A cross-cultural study. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 41(2), 155-162.

3.

Arteche, A., & Murray, L. (2011). Maternal affective disorder and children’s representation of their families. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 20(6), 822-832.

4.

Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2008). Gender differences in creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(2), 75-105.

5.

Betts, D. J. (2006). Art therapy assessments and rating instruments: Do they measure up? The Arts in Psychotherapy, 33(5), 422-434.

6.

Blakemore, J. E. O., Berenbaum, S. A., & Liben, L. S. (2009). Gender Development. New York:Taylor & Francis.

7.

Boyatzis, C. J., & Eades, J. (1999). Gender differences in preschoolers’ and kindergartners’artistic production and preference. Sex Roles, 41(7-8), 627-638.

8.

Brechet, C. (2013). Children’s gender stereotypes through drawings of emotional faces: Do boys draw angrier faces than girls? Sex Roles, 68(5-6), 378-389.

9.

Burns, R. C. (1987). Kinetic House-Tree-Person (KHTP) drawings: An interpretative manual. New York: Brunner.

10.

Buss, A. H., & Durkee, A. (1957). An inventory for assessing different kinds of hostility. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21(4), 343-349.

11.

Callaghan, S., & Joseph, S. (1995). Self-concept and peer victimization among schoolchildren. Personality and Individual Differences, 18(1), 161-163.

12.

Carver, C. C. (1997). You want to measure coping but your protocol’ too long: Consider the brief cope. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4(1), 92-100.

13.

Cherney, I. D., & London, K. (2006). Gender-linked differences in the toys, television shows, computer games, and outdoor activities of 5-to 13-year-old children. Sex Roles, 54(9-10), 717-726.

14.

Cherney, I. D., Seiwert, C. S., Dickey, T. M., & Flichtbeil, J. D. (2006). Children’s drawings:A mirror to their minds. Educational Psychology, 26(1), 127-142.

15.

Cohen, B. M., Hammer, J. S., & Singer, S. (1988). The diagnostic drawing series: A systematic approach to art therapy evaluation and research. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 15(1), 11-21.

16.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.

17.

Cohn, E. S., & Modecki, K. L. (2007). Gender differences in predicting delinquent behavior:Do individual differences matter? Social Behavior and Personality, 35(3), 359-374.

18.

Cox, M. V., Koyasu, M., Hiranuma, H., & Perara, J. (2001). Children’s human figure drawings in the UK and Japan: The effects of age, sex, and culture. Developmental Psychology, 19(2), 275-292.

19.

Drake, M., Lo, J. L., Hwang, M. T., & Shih, L. (1995). Comparison of color meaning and content of drawings by Taiwanese & USA psychiatric patients. Journal of Taiwan Occupational Therapy Association, 12, 41-49.

20.

Earwood, C., Fedorko, M., Holzman, E., Montanari, L., & Silver, R. (2004). Screening for aggression using the draw a story assessment. Art Therapy, 21(3), 156-162.

21.

Garb, H. N. (1998). Recommendations for training in the use of the Thematic Apperception Test (TAT). Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 29(6), 621-622.

22.

Goodenough, F. L. (1926). Measurement of Intelligence by Drawings. Oxford: World Book Co.

23.

Groth-Marnat, G., & Roberts, L. (1998). Human figure drawings and House Tree Person (KHTP) drawings as indicators of self-esteem:a quantitative approach. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 54(2), 219-222.

24.

Grove, W. M. (2000). APA Division 12 Presidential Task Force “Assessment for the Year 2000“Report of the Task Force”. Washington, D. C.:American Psychological Association, Division 12 (Clinical Psychology).

25.

Halpern, D. F. (2004). A cognitive-process taxonomy for sex differences in cognitive abilities. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(4), 135-139.

26.

Harmon-Walker, G., & Kaiser, D. H. (2015). The bird’s nest drawing: A study of construct validity and interrater reliability. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 42, 1-9.

27.

Harris, D. B. (1963). Drawing as a measure of intellectual maturity: A revision and extension of the Goodenough Draw-a-Man test. New York:Harcourt, Brace & World.

28.

Herrera, V. M., & McCloskey, L. A. (2001). Gender differences in the risk for delinquency among youth exposed to family violence. Child Abuse & Neglect, 25(8), 1037-1051.

29.

Howard, A. R. H., Razuri, E. B., Call, C. D., DeLuna, J. H., Purvis, K. B., & Cross, D. R. (2017). Family drawings as attachment representations in a sample of postinstitutionalized adopted children. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 52, 63-71.

30.

Iijima, M., Arisaka, O., Minamoto, F., & Arai, Y. (2001). Sex differences in children’s free drawings: A study on girls with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Hormones and Behavior, 40(2), 99-104.

31.

Ingram, R. E., & Wisnicki, K. S. (1988). Assessment of positive cognition. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56(6), 898-902.

32.

Knoff, H. M., & Prout, H. T. (1985). Kinetic drawing system for family and school: A handbook. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.

33.

Koo, K., & Kim, S. (2014). Effects of family strength on subjective well-being perceived by elementary students: Mediating effect of self-differentiation and moderating effect of gender difference. The Korean Journal of Youth Research, 21(6), 281-307.

34.

Koppitz, E. M. (1968). Psychological evaluation of children’s human figure drawings. London: Grune & Stratton.

35.

Kovacs, M. (1981). Rating scales to assess depression in school-aged children. Acta Paedopsychiatrica, 46(5-6), 305-315.

36.

Krycak, R. C., Murdock, N. L., & Marszalek, J. M. (2012). Differentiation of self, stress, and emotional support as predictors of psychological distress. Contemporary Family Therapy, 34(4), 495-515.

37.

Kubiszyn, T. W., Meyer, G. J., Finn, S. E., Eyde, L. D., Kay, G. G., Moreland, K. L., Dies, R. R., & Eisman, E. J. (2000). Empirical support for psychological assessment in clinical health care settings. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 31(2), 119-130.

38.

Lange-Küttner, C., & Ebersbach, M. (2013). Girls in detail, boys in shape: Gender differences when drawing cubes in depth. British Journal of Psychology, 104(3), 413-437.

39.

Lee, C. J., & Kwak, K. J. (1999). Bulling in school: Conditions and characteristics. Seoul:Jipmoondang.

40.

Lee, H. J., & Won, H. T. (1991). An investigation of the relationship among paranoid tendency, self-concept, and self-awareness. The Korean Journal of Psychological Association, 6, 277-290.

41.

Lee, J. Y., & Kim, J. H. (2002). Assessment of positive cognition: A standardization study of Korean Automatic Thought Questionnaire-Positive: ATQ-P. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 21(3), 647-664.

42.

Lilienfeld, S. O. (1999). Projective measures of personality and psychopathology: How well do they work? Skeptical Inquirer, 23, 32-39.

43.

Lilienfeld, S. O., Wood, J. M., & Garb, H. N. (2000). The scientific status of projective techniques. Psychological Science in the Public Health, 1(2), 27-66.

44.

Lim, N. Y., & Yang, E. (2016). Development and validation of drawing test of youth emotional and behavior problems (Emotional &Behavioral Drawing Test: EBDT). The Korean Journal of Arts Therapy, 16(1), 1-16.

45.

Lim, N. Y. (2014). Development and validation of drawing test of youth emotional behavioral problems. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Korean University, Seoul, Korea.

46.

Malchiodi, C. (1990). Breaking the silence: Art therapy with children from violent homes. New York: Brunner/Mazel.

47.

Marzolf, S. S., & Kirchner, J. H. (1973). Personality traits and color choices for House-Tree-Person drawings. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 29(2), 240-245.

48.

Matlin, M. W. (2004). The psychology of women (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wads worth Publishers.

49.

Mortensen, K. V. (1991). Form and content in children’s human figure drawings: Development, sex differences, and body experience. New York, NY:New York University Press.

50.

Naglieri, J. A. (1988). DAP: Draw A Person, a quantitative scoring system manual. New York:The Psychological Corporation.

51.

Neale, E. L., & Rosal, M. L. (1993). What can art therapists learn from the research on projective drawing techniques for children? A review of the literature. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 20(1), 37-49.

52.

Oh, K. J., Ha, E. H., Lee, H. R., & Hong, K. (2001). K-YSR Youth Self Report. Seoul:Chung-ang Aptitude Publisher.

53.

Palmer, L., Farrar, A. R., Valle, M., Ghahart, N., Panella, M., & DeGraw, D. (2000). An investigation of the clinical use of the House-Tree-Person projective drawings in the psychological evaluation of child sexual abuse. Child Maltreatment, 5(2), 169-175.

54.

Park, C. H., & Kim, G. S. (2013). A validation study on DAS in the prediction of suicidal risk for adolescents. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 40(1), 108-114.

55.

Pianta, R. C., Longmaid, K., & Ferguson, J. E. (1999). Attachment-based classifications of children’s family drawings: Psychometric properties and relations with children’s adjustment in kindergarten. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 28(2), 244-255.

56.

Picard, D. (2015). Sex differences in scores on the Draw-A-Person test across childhood: Do they relate to graphic fluency? Perceptual and Motor Skills, 120(1), 273-287.

57.

Picard, D., & Bouhais, M. (2011). Sex differences in expressive drawing. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(7), 850-855.

58.

Reynolds, C. R., & Richmond, B. O. (1978). What I think and feel - a revised measure of children’s manifest anxiety. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 6(2), 271-280.

59.

Ritnour, M. M., Bovingdon, M., Knutsen, C., Roy, A., Hoshino, J., & Johnson, K. (2014). An examination of differences between adults and adolescent controls using the Diagnostic Drawing Series. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 42, 63-74.

60.

Ronan, K. R., Kendall, P. C., & Rowe, M. (1994). Negative affectivity in children: Development of validation of a self-statement questionnaire. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 18(6), 509-528.

61.

Rothkopf, I., & Turgeon, S. M. (2014). Sex differences in college students’ free drawings and their relationship to 2D:4D ratio and recalled childhood play behavior. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43(2), 311-318.

62.

Schniering, C. A., & Rapee, R. M. (2002). Developing and validity of a measure of children’s automatic thoughts: The children’s automatic thoughts scale. Behavior Research and Therapy, 40, 1091-1190.

63.

Shin, H. Y., & Choi, H. R. (2003). The relations among child abuse by parents, child’s aggression and interpersonal anxiety. The Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 15, 295-307.

64.

Silver, R. (1996). Sex differences in the solitary and assaultive fantasies of delinquent and non-delinquent adolescents. Adolescents, 31(123), 543-553.

65.

Silver, R. A. (1983). Silver drawing test of cognition and emotion. Seattle, WA: Special Child Publications.

66.

Silver, R. A. (1993). Draw-A-Story: Screening for depression and age or gender differences. Sarasota, FL: Ablin Press Distributors.

67.

Silver, R. A. (2002). Three art assessments: The Silver drawing test of cognition and emotion; Draw A Story, screening for depression; and stimulus drawings & techniques. New York: Brunner-Routledge.

68.

Skowron, E. A., & Schmitt, T. A. (2003). Assessing interpersonal fusion: Reliability and validity of a new DSI fusion with others subscale. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 29(2), 209-222.

69.

Turgeon, S. M. (2008). Sex differences in children’s face drawings and their relationship to 2D:4D ratio. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 527-532.

70.

Willsdon, J. A. (1977). Discussion of same sex differences in a study of human figure drawings by children aged four-and-a-half to seven-and-a-half years. In G. Butterworth (Ed.), The child’s representation of the world. New York:Plenum.

71.

Yang, J. W., Hong, S. D., Jung, Y. S., & Kim, J. H. (2005). Validation study of automatic thoughts questionnaire (ATQ-N) and the positive automatic thoughts questionnaire (ATQ-P) in adolescents. The Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 24(3), 631-646.

72.

Zalsman, G., Netanel, R., Fischel, T., Freudenstein, O., Landau, E., Orbach, I., et al. (2000). Human figure drawings in the evaluation of severe adolescent suicidal behavior. American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 39(8), 1024-1031.

logo