바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.32 No.4
Citation Share

A Study on the Development of Comprehensive Evaluation Model for Korean University Libraries

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society / Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, (P)2466-2542;
2001, v.32 no.4, pp.45-75
윤희윤
윤희윤, (2001). A Study on the Development of Comprehensive Evaluation Model for Korean University Libraries. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 32(4), 45-75.
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

University library is more than just a collection. In other words, it is an access point and gateway to a world-wide information. Therefore, the evaluation of hybrid library and information services should be recognized an essential management activity. The goal of this study is to develope a new evaluation model for Korean university libraries, based on the analysis of existing models and perception level of the shakeholder groups. As result of statistical analysis, the study suggested six evaluation domains, thirty-seven indicators, and the relative importance (weight) and measure criterion.

keywords
대학도서관, 평가모형, 평가지표와 가중치

Reference

1.

國立大學圖書館協議會. 대학도서관 평가에 대한 건의서.

2.

文部科學省 學術機關課. .

3.

私立大學圖書館協會. .

4.

윤희윤. (2001). 국내외 대학도서관 평가지표의 비교분석. 情報管理學會誌, 18(3), 239-263.

5.

윤희윤. (1998). 대학도서관 경영규모의 경제성 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 32(2), 143-167.

6.

윤희윤. (2001). 대학도서관 평가지표의 다의성과 지향성. 한국도서관<TEX>$\cdot$</TEX>정보학회지, 32(3), 91-115.

7.

한국도서관협회. .

8.

ALA;ACRL. .

9.

Brophy, P.(et al.). .

10.

Brophy, P.;Wynne, P.M.. .

11.

Cram, J.. (1996). Performance Management, Measurement and Reporting in a Time of Information-centred Change. Australian Library Journal, 45(3), 225-238.

12.

Ennis, K.(ed.). .

13.

Gedeon, J.A.;Rubin, R.E.. (1999). Attribution Theory and Academic Library Performance Evaluation. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 25(1), 18-25.

14.

International Organization for Standardization. .

15.

Joint Funding Councils' Ad Hoc Working Group in Library Performance Indicators. .

16.

Kao, Chiang(et al.). Ranking University Libraries.

17.

Kena, Jenny. .

18.

Lakos, Amos. The Missing Ingredient : Culture of Assessment in Libraries.

19.

Wilson, A.;Pitman, L.;Trahn, I.. .

20.

Liu, L.G.. (2001). The Contribution of Library Collections to Prestige of Academic Programs of Universities : A Quantitative Analysis. Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services, 25(1), 49-65.

21.

Markless, Sharon;Streatfield, David. (2001). Developing Performance and Impact Indicators and Targets in Public and Education Libraries. International Journal of Information Management, 21, 167-179.

22.

Oregon State University. .

23.

Poll, Roswitha;Boekhorst, Peter te. .

24.

Revill, D.H.. (1990). Performance Measures for Academic Libraries. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science, 45(SUP.), 10.

25.

Saracevic, Tefko. (2000). Digital Library Evaluation : Toward and Evolution of Concepts. Library Trends, 49(3;Fall), 365-366.

26.

Van House, N.A.;Weil, B.T.;McClure, C.R.. .

27.

McLean, N.;Wilde, C.. (1991). Evaluating Library Performance : The Search for Relevance?. Australian Academic and Research Libraries, 22(3), 198-210.

28.

岸田和明(等). 大學圖書館におけゐ館內利用と館外貸出との相關關係についての實態分析.

29.

Kebede, G.. Performance Evaluation in Library and Information Systems of Developing Countries : A Study of the Literature.

30.

한국대학교육협의회. .

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society

e-Submission OA Policy