바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.40 No.4
Citation Share

A Comparative Study on the Constructivism and the Structuralism as the Educational Methods

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society / Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, (P)2466-2542;
2009, v.40 no.4, pp.81-92
https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.40.4.200912.81

(2009). A Comparative Study on the Constructivism and the Structuralism as the Educational Methods. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 40(4), 81-92, https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.40.4.200912.81
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

I studied in this paper on the comparative study between the constructivism and the structuralism as the educational methods. On the constructivism in educational methods they say that knowledge is constructed subjectively by person individually(cognitive constructivism) or by persons reciprocally in the society(social constructivism). On the structuralism in educational methods they say that knowledge(structure) is in the closed-end text objectively and person pursue and identify this objective knowledge in the closed-end text. But on the post-structuralism(neostructuralism) they say that the text is not closed-ended but open-ended. So constructivism is consistent with post-structuralism. Education include application of knowledge and awareness of knowledge on my opinion. Education on application of knowledge is more important in this knowledge based society. Constructivism connote the application of knowledge in the education. School library media center and media specialist(teather-librarian) are essential elements of this application of knowledge in the education.

keywords
구성주의, 구조주의, 학교도서관, 교육방법, Constructivism, Structuralism, School Library Media Center, Media Specialist(Teather-Librarian), Constructivism, Structuralism, School Library Media Center, Media Specialist(Teather-Librarian)

Reference

1.

강인애 등. 구성주의 교육학. 교육과학사, 2002.

2.

서진원. “구성주의 학습기법의 발전방안으로서의 학교도서관에 관한 연구.” 한국도서관․정보학회지,제38권, 4호(2007. 12).

3.

소두영. 구조주의. 대우학술총서 인문사회과학. 민음사, 1984.

4.

이홍우. 교육의 개념. 문음사, 2000.

5.

이홍우. 교육의 목적과 난점. 교육과학사, 2000.

6.

한국교육개발원. 교육통계연보 2009. <http://std.kedi.re.kr/index.jsp> [인용 2009. 11. 19].

7.

AASL. Standards for the 21st-Century Learner, 2007.

8.

<http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/aasl/guidelinesandstandards/learningstandards/AASL_LearningStandards.pdf> [cited 2009. 11. 06].

9.

Donham, J. Graduating students who are not only learned but also learners. In E. Rosenfeld& D. V. Loertscher(Eds.), Toward a 21st century school library media program(pp.210-217). Lanham, MD : Scarecrow Press, 2007.

10.

Fosnot, Catherine Twomey et al., 구성주의 이론, 관점, 그리고 실제. 조부경 외 편역. 양서원. 2001.

11.

Frank, Manfred. 신구조주의란 무엇인가. 김윤상 역. 인간사랑. 1998.

12.

Groot, Joanne De and Jennifer Branch. Solid Foundations : A Primer on the Crucial, Critical,and Key Roles of School and Public Libraries in Children's Development. Library Trends, vol.58, no.1(Summer 2009).

13.

IASL, IASL Policy Statement on School Libraries.

14.

<http://www.iasl-online.org/about/handbook/policysl.html?print=l, 페이지1/3> [cited 2009. 10. 17].

15.

Kneller, George F. Movements of Thought in Modern Education. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1984.

16.

Spivey, N. N. 구성주의와 읽기․쓰기. 신헌재 등 역. 도서출판박이정. 2004.

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society

e-Submission OA Policy