open access
메뉴ISSN : 1229-0688
본 연구의 목적은 자기결정이론을 토대로 한국 청소년들에게 알맞은 힉습상담 전략을 탐색하는 것이다. 이를 위해 본 연구에서는 481명의 중고등학생을 대상으로 학습동기, 학업적 효능감, 학업의도, 학업성취도를 측정하고 회귀분석을 통하여 각 변인들 간의 관계와 영향력을 살펴보았다. 연구 결과, 본 연구에서 가정한 “학습동기 → 학업적 효능감 → 학업의도 → 학업성취도”라는 학업수행경로의 직접적인 경로와 “학습동기 → 학업의도”, “학업성취도 → 학업적 효능감”이라는 간접적인 경로 모두 유의미하였다. 연구의 시사점을 살펴보면, 우리나라 청소년들에게는 공부의 필요성과 중요성을 깨닫도록 도와주고, 자율성과 자기관리능력을 길러주고, 공부와 관련된 불안감, 죄책감, 수치심, 경쟁심을 완화시키고, 무동기의 상태를 예방하는 전략이 필요하지만, 내재적 동기와 공부에 대한 자신감을 길러주는 것은 학업성취도를 향상시키는데 도움이 되지 않았다.
The goal of this paper is to find counseling strategies to improve adolescents' academic performance, based on self-determination theory. Academic performance processes assumed in this study i.e.,learning motivation →self-efficacy of academic performance → intention to study → academic achievement was examined through regression analyses with data from 481 middle or high school students. Based on the results, the following implications and counseling strategies should be employed: Enhance students’identified regulations but inhibit their introjected, external and non-regulationsHelp them to know values and meanings of learning, to reduce their guilty, shame, pressure, competition and anxiety related academic performance, and to prevent their amotivation and helplessnessself-management was a less important variable than self-confidence and intrinsic motivation for improving academic performance.
김아영, 박인영 (2001). 학업적 자기효능감 척도 개발 및 타당화 연구. 교육학 연구, 39(1), 95-123.
김아영, 오순애 (2001). 자기결정성 정도에 따른 동기유형의 분류. 교육심리연구, 15(4), 97-119.
김종주 (1990). 입시병. 서울: 하나의학사.
오욱환 (2002). 한국사회의 교육열: 기원과 심화. 서울: 교육과학사.
이민희 (2007). 학습장면에서 자기결정론의 동기화 경로모형 검증. 중앙대학교 박사학위논문.
이민희, 정태연 (2007). 청소년용 학습동기척도의 개발 및 타당화. 한국청소년연구, 18(3), 295-321.
이민희, 정태연 (2008a). 자기결정이론을 토대로 한 학습동기경로 모형 검증. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 14(1), 77-99.
이종각 (2003). 교육열 올바로 보기. 서울: 원미사.
Blais, M. R., Sabourin, S., Boucher, C., & Vallerand, R. J. (1990). Toward a motivational model of couple happiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(5), 1021-1031.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
Fishbein (1980). An overview of the attitude construct, in G. B. Hafer(ed.), A look back, a look ahead. Chicago: American Marketing Association.
Grolnick, W. S., & Apostoleris, N. H. (2004). What makes parents controlling? In E. L. Deci, and R. M. Ryan(Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (162-179). Rochester: The University of Rochester press.
Grolnick, W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). Autonomy in children's learning: An experimental and individual difference investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 890-898.
Reeve, J. (2004). Self-determination theory applied to educational settings. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp.183-199). Rochester: The University of Rochester press.
Reeve, J. (2005). Understanding motivation and emotion. New York: Wiley.
Ryan, R. M. (1982). Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(3), 450-461.
Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 749-761.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2004). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic- dialectical perspective. In E. L. Deci, & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp.3-33). Rochester: The University of Rochester Press.
Ryan, R. M., & Grolnick, W. S. (1986). Origins and pawns in the classroom: Self-report and projective assessment of individual differences in children's perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(3), 550-558.
Ryan, R. M., Rigby, S., & King, K. (1993). Two types of religious internalization and their relations to religious orientations and mental health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(3), 586-596.
Vallerand, R. J., & Bissonnette, R. (1992). Intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivational styles as predictors of behavior: A prospective study. Journal of Personality, 60, 599-620.
Vallerand, R. J., Fortier, M. S., & Guay, F. (1997). Self-determination and persistence in a real-life setting: Toward a motivational model of high school dropout. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(5), 1161-1176.
Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Briere, N. M., Senecal, C., & Vallieres, E. F. (1992). The academic motivation scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 1003-1017.
Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Briere, N. M., Senecal, C., & Vallieres, E. F. (1993). On the assessment of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivatiom in education: Evidence on the concurrent validity of the academic motivation scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 159-172.
Vallerand, R. J., & Ratelle, C. F. (2004). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: A hierarchical model. In E. L. Deci, & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 37-59). Rochester: The University of Rochester Press.
Williams, G. C., Grow, V. M., Freedman, J. R., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (1996). Motivational predictors of weight loss and weight-loss maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(1). 115-126.