바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

메뉴

한국판 외상경험 개방에 대한 사회적 반응 척도(K-SRQ) 타당화

A Validation of the Korean Version of the Social Reactions Questionnaire

초록

본 연구에서는 외상경험 개방에 대한 사회적 반응을 측정하기 위해 Ullman(2000)이 개발한 사회적 반응 척도(Social Reactions Questionnaire: SRQ)를 한국판으로 타당화하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 원척도를 번안하여 한국판 사회적 반응 척도를 제작하여 요인구조를 확인하고, 그 신뢰도 및 타당도를 검증하였다. 서울 및 수도권 소재 여자 대학생 672명을 대상으로 설문을 실시하여 대인간 외상 경험이 있는 292명의 자료를 분석에 사용하였다. 예비 문항의 문항분석을 통해 문항의 양호도를 평가하고, 평균, 문항-총점 상관, 내적합치도 등을 고려하여 문제가 되는 2문항을 삭제하여 44문항으로 최종문항을 구성하였다. 최종척도의 요인구조를 확인하고자 확인적 요인분석을 실시하였다. 그 결과 원척도와 동일하게 7요인 상호 상관 모델이 가장 적합한 것으로 나타났다. 신뢰도 검증을 위해 내적합치도 α값을 산출한 결과 전체 척도와 각 요인의 내적합치도가 모두 높게 나타나 본 척도가 신뢰롭게 구성된 것을 확인하였다. 추가적인 타당도 검증을 위해 관련 척도들과 상관 및 회귀분석을 통해 변별타당도와 준거관련 타당도를 확보하였다. 본 연구 결과를 토대로 연구의 의의와 제한점에 대해서 함께 논의하였다.

keywords
대인간 외상, 사회적 반응, SRQ, PTSD, 트라우마, interpersonal assault, social reactions, trauma, ptsd

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the validity and the reliability of a Korean version of the Social Reactions Questionnaire (K-SRQ). The SRQ(Ullman, 2000) is a self-report questionnaire used to assess both positive and negative reactions a person receives from others after the disclosure of sexual assault. To validate SRQ in Korea, item translation and back-translation, item analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were conducted in a 292 undergraduate students who have experienced interpersonal assault. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the seven factors structure of the K-SRQ and all factors were correlated one another. All seven factors showed adequate internal consistency and item-total correlations. The K-SRQ factors were adequately related to the social support, self-esteem and psychological symptoms, supporting good discriminant and criterion validity. Results were also discussed in relations to the potential utility of the scale.

keywords
대인간 외상, 사회적 반응, SRQ, PTSD, 트라우마, interpersonal assault, social reactions, trauma, ptsd

참고문헌

1.

김교헌 (1992). 자기노출의 기능. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 11(1), 81-107.

2.

김교헌 (1994). 자기노출과 분노 억제 경향에 따른 생리, 정서 및 자기 이해 효과. 성균관대학교 박사학위논문.

3.

김남걸 (2001). Likert 척도 개발을 위한 문항선정 방법의 비교 분석. 연세대학교 석사학위논문.

4.

김아영, 차정은, 이채희, 서애리, 최기연 (2004). 학교급간 학업적 자기조절척도의 구인동등성 검증 및 잠재평균분석. 교육심리연구, 18(2), 227-244.

5.

김주환, 김민규, 홍세희 (2009). 구조방정식으로논문쓰기. 서울: 커뮤니케이션북스

6.

김희정, 권정혜, 김종남, 이 란, 이건숙 (2008). 유방암 생존자의 외상후성장 관련 요인탐색. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 13(3), 781-799.

7.

남보라, 권호인, 권정혜 (2010). 한국판 외상후스트레스 진단 척도의 신뢰도 및 타당도 연구. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 29(1), 148-167.

8.

서영석, 조화진, 안하얀, 이정선 (2012). 한국인이 경험한 외상사건: 종류 및 발생률. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 24(3), 671-701.

9.

안현의 (2005). 청소년의 심리적 외상에 관한탐색적 연구: 외상후 스트레스 증상과 성격 특성을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 상담및 심리치료, 17(1), 217-231.

10.

이은정, 조성호 (2000). 심리적 상처 경험에 대한 글쓰기 고백의 효과. 한국심리학회지:상담 및 심리치료, 12(2), 205-220.

11.

이자영, 남숙경, 이미경, 이지희, 이상민 (2009). Rosenberg의 자아존중감 척도: 문항수준타당도분석. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 21(1), 173-189.

12.

장진이 (2010). 반복적 대인간 외상 경험자의 자기체계 손상과 심리적 특성. 이화여자대학교 박사학위논문.

13.

전겸구, 최상진, 양병창 (2001). 통합적 한국판CES-D 개발. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 6(1), 59-76.

14.

탁진국 (2006). 심리검사 개발과 평가방법의 이해. 서울: 학지사.

15.

홍세희 (2000). 구조방정식 모형의 적합도 지수 선정기준과 그 근거. 한국심리학회지:임상, 19(1), 161-177.

16.

Ahrens, C. A., Cabral, G., & Abeling, S. (2009). Healing or hurtful: sexual assault survivors’interpretations of social reactions from support providers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 81-94.

17.

Ahrens, C. A., Campbell, R., Ternier-Thames, K., Wasco, S., & Sefl, T. (2007). Deciding whom to tell: Expectations and outcomes of sexual assault survivors' first disclosures. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 38-49.

18.

Andrews, B., Brewin, C. R., & Rose, S. (2003). Gender, social support, and PTSD in victims of violent crime. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 16, 421-427.

19.

Bagozzi, R. P., & Edward, J. R. (1998). A general approach for representing constructs in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 1, 45-87.

20.

Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.

21.

Blumenthal, J. A., Burg, M. M., Barefoot, J., Williams, R. B., Haney, T., & Zimet, G. (1987). Social support, type a behavior, and coronary artery disease. Psychosomatic Medicine, 49, 331-340.

22.

Bolton, E. E., Glenn, D. M., Orsillo, S., Roemer, L., & Litz, B. T. (2003). The relationship between self-disclosure and symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder in peacekeepers deployed to Somalia. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 16, 203-210.

23.

Campbell, R., Wasco, S. M., Ahrens, C. E., Sefl, T., & Barnes, H. E. (2001). Preventing the “second rape”: Rape survivors' expericences with community service providers. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 1239-1259.

24.

Cohen, S., & Willis, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310-357.

25.

Dahlem, N. C., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988). The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of personality assessment, 52, 30-41.

26.

Davis, R. C., Brickman, E. R., & Baker, R. (1991). Effects of supportive and unsupportive responses of others to rape victims: Effects on concurrent victim adjustment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 443-451.

27.

Filipas, H. H., & Ullman, S. E. (2001). Social reactions to sexual assault victims from various support sources. Violence and Victims, 16, 673-692.

28.

Fisher, B. S., Daigle, L. E., Cullen, F. T., & Turner, M. G. (2003). Reporting sexual victimization to the police and others: Results from a national-level study of college women. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30, 6-38.

29.

Foa, E. B., Cashman, L., Jaycox, I., & Perry, K. (1997). The validation of a self-report measures of posttraumatic stress disorder: The Posttaumatic Diagnosis Scale. Psychological Assessment, 9, 445-451.

30.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.

31.

Foynes, M. M., & Freyd, J. J. (2012). An exploratory study evaluating responses to the disclosure of stressful life experiences as they occurred in real time. Psychological Trauma:Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 5, 295-300.

32.

Hair, J. F. Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis (5th ed). Prentice-Hall International.

33.

Hassija, C. M., & Gray, M. J. (2012). Negative social reactions to assault disclosure as a mediator between self-blame and posttraumatic stress symptoms among survivors of interpersonal assault. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 3425-3441.

34.

Herbert, T. B., & Dunkel-Schetter, C. (1992). Negative social reactions to victims: An overview of responses and their determinants. In L. Montada, S. Filipp, & M. J. Lerner(Eds.). Life crises and experiences of loss in adulthood (pp.497-518). Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.

35.

House, J. S. (1981). Work stress and social support. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

36.

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis:Conventional criteria versus new alternative. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.

37.

Jackson, Y., & Warren, J. S. (2003). Appraisal, social support, and life events: Predicting outcome behavior in school-age children. Child development, 71, 1441-1457.

38.

Kaniasty, K., & Norris, F. H. (1992). Social support and victims of crime: Matching event, support, and outcome. American Journal of Community Psychology, 20, 211-241.

39.

Keller, S. M., Zoellner, L. A., & Feeny, N. C. (2010). Understanding factors asociated with early therapeutic alliance in PTSD treatment:Adherence, childhood sexual abuse history, and social support. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78, 974-979.

40.

Kishton, J. M., & Widaman, K. F. (1994). Unidimensional versus domain representative parceling of questionnaire items: An empirical example. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 757-765.

41.

Littleton, H. L. (2010). The impact of social support and negative disclosure reactions on sexual assault victims: A cross-sectional and longitudinal investigation. Journal of Trauma and Dissociation, 11, 210-227.

42.

Littleton, H. L., & Breitkopf, C. R. (2006). Coping with the experience of rape. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 106-116.

43.

Macy, R. J., Nurius, P. S., & Norris, J. (2006). Responding in their best interests contextualizing women’s coping with acquaintance sexual aggression. Violence Against Women, 12, 478-500.

44.

Pennebaker, J. W. (1988). Confiding traumatic experience and health. In S. Fisher & J. Reason (Eds.), Handbook of life stress, cognition and health (pp. 669-682). New York: John Wiely and Sons.

45.

Pennebaker, J. W. (1997). Writing about emotional experiences as a therapeutic process. American Psychological Society, 8, 162-166.

46.

Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385-401.

47.

Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

48.

Tolin, D. F., & Foa, E. B. (2006). Sex differences in trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder: A quanttative review of 25 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 959-992.

49.

Tucker, L. R., & Lewis C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrica, 38, 1-10.

50.

Ullman, S. E. (1996). Do social reactions to sexual assault victims vary by support provider?. Violence and Victims, 11, 143-156.

51.

Ullman, S. E. (1999). Social support and recovery from sexual assault: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior: A Review Journal, 4, 343-358.

52.

Ullman, S. E. (2000). Psychometric Characteristics of the social reactions questionnaire. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 257-271.

53.

Ullman, S. E. (2007). Relationship to perpetrator, disclosure, social reactions, and PTSD symptoms in child sexual abuse survivors. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse: Research, Treatment, & Program Innovations of victims, Survivors, & Offenders, 16, 19-36.

54.

Ullman, S. E. (2011). Is disclosure of sexual traumas helpful? comparing experimental laboratory versus field study results. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 20, 148-162.

55.

Ullman, S. E., & Filipas, H. H. (2001). Predictors of PTSD symptom severity and social reactions in sexual assault vixtims. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 14, 369-389.

56.

Ullman, S. E., Townsend, S. M., Filipas, H. H., & Starzynski, L. L. (2007). Structural models of the relations of assault severity, social support, avoidance coping, self-blame, and PTSD among sexual assault survivors. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 23-37.

57.

Wyatt, G. E. (1992). The sociocultural context of African and White American women's rape. Journal of Social Issues, 48, 77-91.

58.

Zoellner, L. A., Foa, E. B., & Bartholomew, D. B. (1999). Interpersonal friction and PTSD in female victims of sexual and nonsexual assault. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 12, 689-700.

logo