open access
메뉴
open access
메뉴
ISSN : 1229-0688
본 연구에서는 상담수련생의 전문적 역량의 문제와 관련 현상을 이해하기 위해, 역량에 문제가 있는 수련생들을 접해본 적이 있는 수퍼바이저들의 경험을 살펴보았다. 이를 위해 한국상담심리학회 상담심리전문가 자격증을 소지하고 평균 9년 이상의 수퍼비전 경력을 가진 수퍼바이저 11명을 대상으로 심층면접을 실시하였고, 합의적 질적 방법(CQR)을 사용하여 자료를 분석하였다. 연구 결과, 수퍼바이저들이 경험한 상담수련생의 전문적 역량의 문제는 세 가지 측면(심리적/정신적 측면, 윤리적 측면, 지식적/기술적 측면)으로 구분되었다. 또한 수퍼바이저들은 수련생의 역량을 평가하고 문제를 발견하는 과정에서 수련생이 제출한 축어록이나 학회윤리규정 등 자료를 활용하거나, 수퍼바이저 자신의 직관 또는 동료 수퍼바이저들의 조언 등을 활용하는 것으로 나타났다. 전문적인 역량에 문제가 있다고 판단되는 수련생에 대해 수퍼바이저들은 주로 교육적 피드백을 제공하거나 상담 및 교육분석을 권유한다고 보고하였다. 마지막으로, 수퍼바이저들은 수련생의 역량을 평가하고 문제를 다루는 과정에서 수퍼바이저 자신의 한계뿐 아니라 지원 체제의 부재로 인해 어려움을 경험하는 것으로 나타났다. 연구결과를 토대로 상담자 교육 및 수퍼비전, 후속연구에 대한 시사점을 논하였다.
This study qualitatively examined supervisors' experiences of professional competence problems in counselors-in-training. Eleven supervisors were interviewed who had been certified by the Korean Counseling Psychological Association and supervised trainees for nine years on average. Data were analyzed using consensual qualitative research methodology. Results showed that the supervisors perceived trainees' psychological/mental problems, moral character problems, and knowledge/skill deficits as professional competence problems. They identified and evaluated trainees' professional competence problems using objective data (e. g., session transcripts, code of ethics for counselors) and subjective experiences (e. g., supervisor's intuition, peer counselors' advice). The participants also reported that they intervened trainees' problems by way of providing educational feedback or recommending personal psychotherapy. In addition, supervisors reported various difficulties with dealing with trainees' professional competence problems due to personal limitations, absence of support system and specific guidelines for supervisors. Implications for counselor training and education, supervision, and future research are discussed.
김길문, 정남운 (2004). 초보 상담자가 상담 회기 내에 경험한 어려움과 대처 과정: 질적 분석. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 16(1), 1-20.
김미지 (2009). 초보상담자가 상담에서 경험하는 어려움: 문항개발. 청소년상담연구, 17(2), 21-37.
김지연, 한나리, 이동귀 (2009). 초심상담자와상담전문가가 겪는 어려움과 극복방안에대한 개념도 연구. 상담학연구, 10(2), 769-792.
보건복지부 (2012). 2011년도 정신질환실태 역학조사 보고서.
유성경, 이문희, 조은향 (2010). 교육분석가(상담자의 상담자)의 특성과 선택. 상담학연구, 11(4), 1411-1431.
이소연 (2011). 상담수련생의 전문적 역량의 문제에 대한 수퍼바이저의 인식과 개입과정에 관한 질적 연구. 연세대학교 석사학위논문.
이숙영, 김창대 (2002). 상담 전공 대학원 교육과정 표준화 연구. 교육학연구, 40(2), 231-250.
이영순 (2010). 초보 상담자들의 어려움과 역전이 관리능력 및 상담성과 간의 관계. 상담학연구, 11(3), 1021-1035.
이은경, 양난미, 서은경 (2007). 한국에서의 상담에 대한 질적 연구. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 19(3), 587-607.
이홍숙, 주수현, 김효정 (2011). 인턴 상담원의상담자 발달에서의 결정적 사건 경험. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 23(4), 833-859.
한국상담심리학회 (2009). 상담전문가 윤리강령. http://krcpa.miraeis.com/sub01_5.asp? menuCategory=1
Bernard, J. M., & Goodyear, R. K. (2004). Fundamentals of clinical supervision (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Bodner, K. E. (2012). Ethical principles and standards that inform educational gatekeeping practices in psychology. Ethics and Behavior, 22(1), 60-74.
Corey, G., Corey, M. S., & Callanan, P. (2008). 상담 및 심리치료 윤리[Issues and ethics in the helping professions. (7th Ed.). Belmont: Thompson Brooks/Cole]. (서경현, 정성진 역). 서울: 시그마프레스(원전은 2007년).
Elman, N. S., & Forrest, L. (2004). Psychotherapy in the remediation of psychology trainees:Exploratory interviews with training directors. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35(2), 123-130.
Elman, N. S., & Forrest, L. (2007). From trainee impairment to professional competence problems: Seeking new terminology that facilitates effective action. Professional Psychology:Research and Practice, 38(5), 501-509.
Falender, C. A., Collins, C. J., & Shafranske, E. P. (2004). Use of the term “impairment” in psychology supervision. APPIC Newsletter. Retrieved October, 12, 2011, from http://www.appic.org/NewsOnline/Articles/SuperImpair ment12-8-04.html
Falender, C. A., Collins, C. J., & Shafranske, E. P. (2009). “Impairment” and performance issues in clinical supervision: After the 2008 ADA amendments act. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 3(4), 240-249.
Forrest, L., Elman, N., Gizara, S., & Vacha-Haase, T. (1999). Trainee impairment: A review of identification, remediation, dismissal, and legal issues. The Counseling Psychologist, 27(5), 627-686.
Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2003). Educational research: An introduction (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Gizara, S. S., & Forrest, L. (2004). Supervisors’experiences of trainee impairment and incompetence at APA-accredited internship sites. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35(2), 131-140.
Hensley, L. G., Smith, S. L., & Thompson, R. W. (2003). Assessing competencies of counselors in-training: Complexities in evaluating personal and professional development. Counselor Education and Supervision, 42(3), 219-230.
Hill, C. E. (2012). Introduction to consensual qualitative research. In C. E. Hill (Ed.), Consensual qualitative research: A practical resource for investigating social science phenomena (pp. 3-20). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Hill, C. E., Knox, S., Thompson, B. J., Williams, E. N., Hess, S., A., & Ladany, N. (2005). Consensual qualitative research: An update. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 196-205.
Hill, C. E., Sullivan, C., Knox, S., & Schlosser, L. Z. (2007). Becoming psychotherapists:Experiences of novice trainees in a beginning graduate class. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 44(4), 434-449.
Hill, C. E., Thompson, B. J., & Williams, E. N. (1997). A guide to conducting consensual qualitative research. The Counseling Psychologist, 25(4), 517-572.
Huprich, S. K., & Rudd, M. D. (2004). A national survey of trainee impairment in clinical, counseling, and school psychology doctoral programs and internships. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60(1), 43-52.
Johnson, W. B., & Campbell, C. D. (2002). Character and fitness requirements for professional psychologists: Are there any? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33(1), 46-53.
Johnson, W. B., & Campbell, C. D. (2004). Character and fitness requirements for professional psychologists: Training directors’perspectives. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35(4), 405-411.
Kaslow, N. J., Rubin, N. J., Forrest, L., Elman, N. S., Van Horne, B. A., Jacobs, S. C., Huprich, S. K., Benton, S. A., Pantesco, V. F., Dollinger, S. J., Grus, C. L., Behnke, S. H., Shen-Miller, D. S., Shealy, C. N., Mintz, L. B., Schwartz-Mette, R., Van Sickle, K., & Thorn, B. E. (2007). Recognizing, assessing, and intervening with problems of professional competence. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 38(5), 479-492.
Kerl, S. B., Garcia, J. L., McCullough, C. S., & Maxwell, M. E. (2002). Systematic evaluation of professional performance: Legally supported procedure and process. Counselor Education and Supervision, 41(4), 321-332.
Ladany, N., Thompson, B. J., & Hill, C. E. (2012). Cross-analysis. In C. E. Hill (Ed.), Consensual qualitative research: A practical resource for investigating social science phenomena (pp. 117-134). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
McAdams Ⅲ, C. R., Foster, V. A., & Ward, T. J. (2007). Remediation and dismissal policies in counselor education: Lessons learned from a challenge in federal court. Counselor Education and Supervision, 46(3), 212-229.
Norcross, J. C. (2005). The psychotherapist's own psychotherapy: Educating and developing psychologists. American Psychologist, 60(8), 840-850.
Oliver, M. N. I., Bernstein, J. H., Anderson, K. G., Blashfield, R. K., & Roberts, M. C. (2004). An exploratory examination of student attitudes toward “impaired” peers in clinical psychology training programs. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35(2), 141-147.
Rosenberg, J. I., Getzelman, M. A., Arcinue, F., & Oren, C. Z. (2005). An exploratory look at students’ experiences of problematic peers in academic professional psychology programs. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 36(6), 665-673.
Rust, J. P., Raskin, J. D., & Hill, M. S. (2013). Problems of professional competence among counselor trainees: Programmatic issues and guidelines. Counselor Education and Supervision, 52(1), 30-42.
Shen-Miller, D. S., Grus, C. L., Van Sickle, K. S., Schwartz-Mette, R., Cage, E. A., Elman, N. S., Jacobs, S. C., & Kaslow, N. J. (2011). Trainees' Experiences with peers having competence problems: A national survey. Training and education in professional psychology, 5(2), 112-121.
Thompson, B. J., Vivino, B. L., & Hill, C. E. (2012). Coding the data: Domains and core ideas. In C. E. Hill (Ed.), Consensual qualitative research: A practical resource for investigating social science phenomena (pp. 103-116). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Vacha-Haase, T., Davenport, D. S., & Kerewsky, S. D. (2004). Problematic student: Gatekeeping practices of academic professional psychology programs. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35(2), 115-122.