바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

메뉴

상담 과정에서 상담자의 진정성 경험에 대한 질적 연구

A Qualitative Study on Counselors’ Authenticity Based on Counselors’ Experiences in Counseling Sessions

초록

본 연구는 상담 과정에서 상담자가 경험하는 진정성과 진정성의 방해요인 및 회복요인을 밝히고자 진행되었다. 이를 위해 숙련상담자 10명을 대상으로 심층면접을 실시했고, 합의적 질적 연구법으로 분석하였다. 그 결과 8개의 영역, 16개의 하위영역, 57개의 범주가 도출되었다. 각 영역은 상담자의 ‘진정성 개념’, ‘진정성 경험’, ‘진정성이 미치는 영향’, ‘비진정성 경험’, ‘비진정성이 미치는 영향’, ‘진정성 방해요인’, ‘진정성 회복요인’, ‘진정성 발달요인’이다. 연구 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 상담자의 진정성은 상담자가 자신의 내면 경험과 일치하게 표현하되 내담자의 유익을 위해 선택적으로 표현하는 것이다. 둘째, 상담자의 진정성 있는 모습과 행동은 경험의 소통, 존중과 이해, 지금-여기에서의 현존이었다. 셋째, 진정성 방해요인은 ‘판단 및 평가하는 마음’이었고, 회복요인으로는 ‘상담 경험에 대한 자각’과 ‘내담자와 경험을 나누고 검토함’이었다. 넷째, 상담자의 진정성은 치료의 동력이 되었으며 신뢰를 형성했다. 이와 같은 연구 결과를 바탕으로 본 연구의 시사점과 제한점 및 후속 연구의 필요성을 논의했다.

keywords
authenticity, genuineness, congruence, developmental factors of authenticity, consensual qualitative research, 상담자의 진정성, 진실성, 일치성, 진정성 발달요인, 합의적 질적 연구(CQR)

Abstract

This study explored the construct and features of authenticity as perceived by counselors based on their experiences in counseling sessions. In-depth interviews were conducted with 10 experienced counselors, and analyzed using the consensual qualitative research method. The counselors perceived authenticity to mean being aware of one’s internal experiences and expressing them accordingly for the benefit of the client. counselors felt that authenticity was demonstrated through respecting and understanding the client, and being fully present with the client in sessions. Counselors identified judging clients, which is negative transference, as a hinderance to authenticity. Whereas, being aware of one’s own experiences in counseling sessions, communicating these experiences with clients, and reflecting on one’s experiences after the session, were identified as resilience factors. Finally, counselors expressed that their authenticity fostered authenticity in their clients. Implications, limitations, and recommendations for further research are discussed.

keywords
authenticity, genuineness, congruence, developmental factors of authenticity, consensual qualitative research, 상담자의 진정성, 진실성, 일치성, 진정성 발달요인, 합의적 질적 연구(CQR)

참고문헌

1.

곽소영, 이지연 (2013). 한국판 관계진솔성 척도의 타당화. 상담학 연구, 14(4), 2213- 2232.

2.

김계원, 정종진, 권희영, 이윤주, 김춘경 (2011). 상담심리학의 최근 연구 동향. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 23(3), 521-542.

3.

김미경 (2002). 로저스의 인간중심 상담에서 진실성의 의미. 연세대학교 석사학위논문.

4.

김예실, 이희경 (2010). 진정성에 대한 고찰. 인간이해, 31(2), 1-21.

5.

김준혜, 안현의 (2013). 상담자 발달수준, 마음챙김 및 역전이 관리능력과의 관계. 인간이해, 34(2), 95-109.

6.

남태현, 이희경 (2016). 정서적 지지가 삶의 의미에 미치는 영향: 관계성을 통한 진정성의 매개된 조절효과. 상담학연구, 17(3), 45-64.

7.

서준호, 이희경 (2014). 상담자의 진정성과 작업동맹의 관계에서 소진의 매개효과. 상담학연구, 15(5), 1717-1734.

8.

손진희 (2001). 상담과정에서 상담자의 알아차림 방해요소 연구. 서울대학교 박사학위논문.

9.

윤정숙, 유성경 (2016). 내담자의 일방적 상담종결 영향변인 검증: 비연속시간 생존분석 적용. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 28(1), 1-31.

10.

이향숙 (2009). 진실성과 주관적 안녕감과의 관계에서 기본 심리적 욕구의 매개효과검증. 아주대학교 석사학위논문.

11.

이희경 (2016). 상담자의 사회부과 완벽주의와 정신건강의 관계: 진정성의 조절효과. 상담학연구, 17(1), 89-106.

12.

홍정순 (2015). 진정성 척도 개발 및 상담자의 진정성과 작업동맹간의 관계 모형검증. 가톨릭대학교 박사학위논문.

13.

홍정순, 정남운 (2013). 상담자 진정성 연구에 대한 고찰. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 25(3), 371-395.

14.

최바올, 백근영, 이은지, 김애란, 왕윤정 (2013). 커플의 성인애착과 관계만족: 관계진솔성의 매개효과 검증. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 25(2), 227-250.

15.

Adomaitis, R. M. (1992). On being genuine: A phenomenologically grounded study of the experience of genuineness and its place in client- centered psychotherapy. Doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University, Illinois, USA.

16.

Blanco, P. J. Muro, J. H., & Stickley, V. K. (2014). Understanding the concept of genuineness in play therapy: Implication for the supervision and teaching of beginning play therapists. International Journal of Play Therapy, 23, 44-54.

17.

Brodley, T. B. (2001). Congruence and its relation to communication in client-centered therapy. In G. Wyatt (Ed.), Rogers’ therapeutic conditions: Evolution, therapy, and practice, Vol. 1: Congruence (pp. 55-78). Monmouth: PCCS Books.

18.

Burks, D. J. (2009). Psychologists’ authenticity. Doctoral dissertation, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma. USA.

19.

Carkhuff, R. (1969). Helping and human relations. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

20.

Cooper, M. (2005). Therapists’ experiences of relational depth: A qualitative interview study, Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 5, 87-95.

21.

Davis, M. H. (1983). The effect of dispositional empathy on emotional reactions and helping: A multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality, 51, 167-184.

22.

Gelso, C. J., & Carter, J. A. (1994). Components of the psychotherapy relationship: Their interaction and unfolding during treatment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 41, 296-306.

23.

Goldman, B. M., & Kernis, M. H. (2004). The development of the authenticity inventory, version 3. Unpublished data.

24.

Greenberg, L., & Geller, S. (2001). Congruence and therapeutic presence. In G. Wyatt (Ed.), Rogers’ therapeutic conditions: Evolution, therapy, and practice, Vol. 1, Congruence (pp. 131-149). Monmouth: PCCS Books.

25.

Greenberg, L. S., & Watson, J. C. (2005). Emotion- focused therapy for depression. Washington: American Psychological Association.

26.

Greenson, R. R. (1972). Beyond transference and interpretation. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 53, 213-217.

27.

Gudjonsson. G. H., & Sigurdsson, J. F. (2004). The relationship of suggestibility and compliance with self-deception and other- deception. Psychology, Crime and Law, 19, 447-453.

28.

Hill, C. (2016). 합의적 질적 연구: 사회과학 현상탐구의 실질적 접근 (주은선 역). 서울: 학지사. (원전은 2012에 출판)

29.

Hill, C. E., & Knox, S. (2009). Processing the therapeutic relationship. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 13-29.

30.

Hill, C. E., Knox, S., Thompson, B. J., Williams, E. N., Hess, S. A., & Ladany, N. (2005). Consensual qualitative research: An update. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 196-205.

31.

Jung, E., Wiesjahn, M., Rief, W., & Lincoln, T. M. (2015). Perceived therapist genuineness predicts therapeutic alliance cognitive behavioral therapy for psychosis. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 54, 34-48.

32.

Kernis, M. H., & Goldman. B. M. (2005). From thought and experience to behavior and interpersonal relationships: A multicomponent conceptualization of authenticity. In A. Tesser, J. V. Wood, & D. Stapel (Eds.), On building, defending and regulating the self: A psychological perspective. New York: Psychology Press.

33.

Kolden, G. G., Klein, M. H., Wang, C., & Austin, S. B. (2011). Congruence or genuineness. Psychotherapy: Theory/Research/ Practice/Training, 48, 65-71.

34.

Lakey, C., Kernis, M., Heppner, W., & Lance, C. (2008). Individual differences in authenticity and mindfulness as predictors of verbal defensiveness. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 230-238.

35.

Levitt, H., Butler, M., & Hill, T. (2006). What clients find helpful in psychotherapy: Developing principles for facilitating moment to moment change. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 314-324.

36.

Lietaer, G. (1993). Authenticity, congruence and transparency. In D. Brazier (Ed.), Beyond Carl Rogers: Toward a psychotherapy for the twenty-first century (pp. 17-46). London: Constable.

37.

Mairs, R. (2002). Existential authenticity: A foundational value for counseling. Counseling and Values, 46, 218-225.

38.

Minnillo, P. R. (2007). A grounded theoretical approach to the origin and significance of authenticity as perceived by therapists within the therapeutic encounter. Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Indiana. USA.

39.

Miller, J. B. (1997). The Drama of the gifted child: The search for the true self. New York: Basic Books.

40.

Mitchell, S. (1992). True selves, false selves, and the ambiguity of authenticity. In N. J. Skolnick & S. C. Warshaw (Eds.) Relational perspectives in psychoanalysis (pp. 1-20). Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.

41.

Norcross, J. (2002). Psychotherapy relationships that work. New York: Oxford University Press.

42.

Rhodes, R. H., Hill, C. E., Thompson, B. J., & Elliott, R. (1994). Client retrospective recall of resolved and unresolved misunderstanding events. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 41, 473-483.

43.

Robinson, O. C., Lopez, F. G., Ramos, K., & Nartova-Bochaver, S. (2012). Authenticity, social context, and well-being in the United States, England, and Russia: A three country comparative analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44, 719-737.

44.

Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist’s view of psychotherapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

45.

Snyder, M. (1987). Public appearances, private realities: The psychology of self-monitoring. New-York: Freeman.

46.

Sue, D. W., & Sue, D. (2003). Counseling the culturally diverse: Theory and practice, 4th edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

47.

Tudor, K., & Worrall, M. (1994). Congruence reconsidered. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 22, 197-206.

48.

Vivino, B. L., Thompson, B., Hill, C. E., & Ladany, N. (2009). Compassion in psychotherapy: The perspective of psychotherapists nominated as compassionate. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 157-171.

49.

Wang, Y, N. (2016). Balanced authenticity predicts optimal well-being: Theoretical conceptualization and empirical development of the authenticity in relationship scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 94, 316-323.

50.

Wood, A., Linley, P. A., Maltby, J., Baliousis, M., & Joseph, S. (2008). The Authentic Personality: A Theoretical and Empirical Conceptualization and the Development of the Authenticity Scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 55, 385-399.

51.

Wyatt, G. (2001). The Multifaceted nature of congruence within the therapeutic relationship. In G. Wyatt (Ed.), Rogers’ therapeutic conditions: Evolution, theory, and practice, Vol. 1: Congruence (pp. 79-95). Monmouth: PCCS Books

logo