The purpose of this study is to analyse the Big6 model and the Big6 modification model to find out the characteristics of the Big6 model and to derive implications for applying the Big6 model in the field. For this purpose, the information literacy standards of the AASL and the ACRL were compared with the Big6 model. The Big6 model, influenced by Bloom’s taxonomy was analyzed alongside the Big6+3 model, the Big8 model and the modified Big6 model, provided by LG Science Land. As a result, the Big6 model could be used as an information problem-solving model, metacognitive activation strategy, and scaffolding to improve students’ information literacy. In addition, it could be used as a model for constructivism, inquiry-based learning, the integration of curriculum, collaborative education, and ICT technology. How teacher-librarians or librarians apply the Big6 model is related to the improvement of critical thinking skills. Teacher-librarians and librarians need to plan situations, subjects, topics, and methods in a systematic and specific way when applying the Big6 model to the information literacy curriculum.
교원능력개발평가 실시에 관한 훈령. 2017. 교육부훈령 제217호.
김성준. 2011. 학교도서관의 정보활용교육을 위한 「도서관과 정보생활」 교과서 개발에 관한 연구. 『한국도서관·정보학회지』, 42(3): 271-292.
노진영, 변우열, 이병기. 2009. 학교도서관의 정보활용교육에 의한 탐구수업모형 설계에 관한 연구. 『한국도서관·정보학회지』, 40(1): 471-492.
배경재, 박희진. 2013. 디지털 정보활용교육 운영실태 및 개선방안 연구. 『한국도서관·정보학회지』, 44(2): 241-265.
사공복희. 2007. 초등학교 어린이들의 정보탐색행태에 관한 연구. 『한국도서관·정보학회지』, 38(3): 353-381.
사공복희. 2012. 어린이도서관 온라인목록의 탐색행태에 관한 연구. 『한국도서관·정보학회지』, 43(1): 143-171
서울대학교 교육연구소 편. 1995. 『교육학용어사전』. 서울: 하우.
서진원. 2012. 학교도서관 독서교육방법으로서의 구성주의 학습이론 적용에 관한 연구. 『한국도서관·정보학회지』, 43(3): 265-289.
소병문, 송기호. 2017. 정보문제 해결모형을 통한 소논문쓰기의 교육내용 분석. 『한국도서관・정보학회지』, 48(2): 449-467.
송기호. 2015. 중학교 사회 교과서의 공통 탐구 과제에 포함된 정보활용과정 요소 분석. 『한국문헌정보학회지』, 49(3): 233-252.
심감용외. 2015. 대통령기록물을 활용한 유비쿼터스 기반의 교육서비스 모형 개발. 『한국기록관리학회지』, 15(1): 127-155.
심원식, 안혜연, 변제연. 2015. 질의 언어 및 복잡성이 대학생의 웹 정보탐색에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 『한국문헌정보학회지』, 49(2): 51-73.
오의경. 2011. 정보활용능력 인지 수준과 도서관 불안 간의 관계 분석. 『한국문헌정보학회지』, 45(4): 123-137
이수상. 2007. 우리나라 대학생의 정보 리터러시 수준에 대한 실태조사. 『한국문헌정보학회지』, 41(1): 85-103.
이병기. 2006. 정보활동 중심의 도서관활용수업 모형에 관한 연구. 『한국도서관・정보학회지』, 37(2): 25-46.
이병기. 2007. 국가수준의 교육과정과 연계한 정보활용교육과 도서관활용수업의 제도화. 『한국도서관・정보학회지』, 38(1): 443-462.
이병기. 2009. 미국 학교도서관 기준 관련 문서「21세기 학습자를 위한 기준」의 구조와 내용 분석에 관한 연구. 『한국도서관・정보학회지』, 40(3): 203-223.
이병기 2010. 교육목표분류학에 의한 정보활용과정모형의 재구조화에 관한 연구. 『한국도서관・정보학회지』, 41(2): 107-126.
이승길. 2007. 사서교사의 정보활용능력이 도서관활용수업에 미치는 영향. 『한국문헌정보학회지』, 41(4): 161-180.
이정미. 2015. 청소년의 도서관 인식 및 정보원 이용에 관한 조사연구. 『한국문헌정보학회지』, 49(3): 351-370.
이정연. 2007. 학교도서관과 정보활용교육의 효용성에 관한 연구. 『한국도서관·정보학회지』, 38(4): 67-85.
이정연, 최은주. 2006. 정보활용능력 교육의 효용성에 관한 실험적 연구. 『한국문헌정보학회지』, 40(1): 315-334.
최문정, 정동열. 2013. 메타인지가 대학생의 정보탐색행위에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 『한국문헌정보학회지』, 47(2): 75-101.
최재황. 2016. ACRL 정보 리터러시 ‘프레임웍(2015)’의 중심 개념 고찰. 『한국문헌정보학회지』, 50(3): 171-191.
정진수. 2010. 국내 사서교사 교수활동의 수준에 관한 연구. 『한국비블리아학회지』, 25(1): 153-171.
정영미. 2009. 정보활용 교육이 도서관과 정보활용능력 자가인식에 미치는 영향. 『한국문헌정보학회지』, 43(4): 265-280.
초중등교육법. 2017. 법률 제14603호.
학교도서관진흥법. 2018. 법률 제15368호.
학교도서관진흥법 시행령. 2016. 대통령령 제27129호.
LG사이언스랜드 홈페이지. <http://www.lg-sl.net> [인용 2018. 7. 30].
AASL. 2007. Standards for the 21st century learner. Chicago: AASL.
AASL. 2009. Empowering learners : Guidelines for School Library Programs. Chicago: AASL.
AASL. 2018. National School Library Standards for Learners, School Librarians, and School Libraries. Chicago and London: ALA.
AASL and AECT. 1998. Information Power : Building Partnerships for Learning. Chicago and London: ALA.
ACRL. 2015. Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education. <http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework> [cited 2018. 7. 3].
Anderson, Lorin W., and David R. Krathwohl. ed. 2001. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. complete ed. New York: Longman.
Arroyo, S. S. 2013. “Information Literacy for Health Professionals: Teaching Essential Information Skills with the Big6 Information Literacy Model.” Community & Junior College Libraries, 19: 77–91.
Baji, Fatima. et al. 2018. “Developing Information Literacy Skills of the 6th Grade Students Using the Big6 Model.” Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 23(1): 1-15.
Bloom, B. 1956. Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of education goals. New York: Longmans, Green.
Bot, R. C. 2008. Collaboration in the Elementary Setting while Introducing the Big6 Research Process and a Pathfinder. M. A. thesis. College of St. Scholastica, U. S.
Bruce, C. 1997. The Seven Faces of Information Literacy. Adelaide: Auslib Press.
Bruce, C. 2004. “Information Literacy as a Catalyst for Educational Change: A Background Paper.” In Danaher, P. A. ed. Lifelong Learning: Whose Responsibility and What is Your Contribution? Qld.: Central Queensland University Press.
Bruce, C. S. 2015. Information Literacy: Understanding Peoples' Information and Learning Experiences. <https://eprints.qut.edu.au/95696/3/95696.pdf> [cited 2018. 7. 8].
Buchanan, S. et al. 2016. “Inquiry Based Learning Models, Information Literacy, and Student Engagement: A Literature Review.” School Libraries Worldwide, 22(2): 23-40.
Callison, D. 2004. “Establishing Research Rigor in SLMR.” Knowledge Quest, 32(5): 18–20.
Callison, D. 2015. The Evolution of Inquiry: Controlled, Guided, Modeled, and Free. Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited.
Candy, P. 2002. Lifelong Learning and Information Literacy. <https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f94d/1b7db0ed803048bf2781fec5bb1daa64c3f7.pdf> [cited 2018. 8. 8].
Cavanaugh, J. C. and M. Perlmutter. 1982. Metamemory: A Critical Examination. Child Development, 53: 11–28.
Chen, Shu-Hsien L. 2003. “Searching the Online Catalog and the World Wide Web.” Journal of Educational Media and Library Sciences, 41(1): 29–43.
Chen, L. C. 2011. The Effects of Integrated Information Literacy in Science Curriculum on First-Grade Students’ Memory and Comprehension Using the Super3 Model. Knowledge Management and E-Learning: An International Journal, 3(3): 399-411.
Chen, L. C., Y. Chen, and W. Ma. 2014. “Effects of Integrated Information Literacy on Science Learning and Problem-Solving among Seventh-Grade Students.” Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 19(2): 35-51.
Chu, K. S. 2009. “Inquiry Project-Based Learning with a Partnership of Three Types of Teachers and the School Librarian.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 60(8): 1671-1686.
Chu, S. K. W., S. K. Tse, and K. Chow. 2011. “Using Collaborative Teaching and Inquiry Project-Based Learning to Help Primary School Students Develop Information Literacy and Information Skills.” Library & Information Science Research, 33(2): 132-143.
Chung, Jin Soo, and D. Neuman. 2007. “High School StudentsI’ nformation Seeking and Use for Class Projects.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(10): 1503–17.
Clark, R. E., P. A. Kirschner, and J. Sweller. 2012. “Putting Students on the Path to Learning: The Case for Fully Guided Instruction.” American Educator, 36(1): 6–11.
Detlor, B. et al. 2012. “Student Perceptions of Information Literacy Instruction: The Importance of Active Learning.” Education for Information, 29: 147-161.
Eisenberg M. 2003. “Technology for a Purpose: Technology for Information Problem-Solving with the Big6.” TechTrends, 47(1): 13-17.
Eisenberg, M. 2008. “Information Literacy: Essential Skills for the Information Age.” Journal of Library & Information Technology, 28(2): 39-47.
Eisenberg, M. and R. Berkowitz. 1988. Curriculum initiative: an agenda and strategy for library media programs. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
Eisenberg, M. and R. Berkowitz. 1990. Information problem solving: The Big Six Skills Approach to Library & Information Skills Instruction. N.J.: Ablex.
Eisenberg M., C. A. Lowe, K. L. Spitzer. 2004. Information Literacy. second edition. Connecticut: Library Unlimited.
Eisenberg, M., C. McGuire, and K. L. Spitzer. 2004. Information Literacy: Essential Skills for the Information Age. 2nd ed. CT: Libraries Unlimited.
Eisenberg, M., D. Johnson, and B. Berkowitz. 2010. “Information, Communications, and Technology(ICT) Skills Curriculum Based on the Big6 Skills Approach to Information Problem-Solving.” Library Media Connection, 28(6): 24-27.
Eisenberg, M., J. Murray, and C. Bartow. 2016. The Big6 Curriculum-Comprehensive information and Communication Technology(ICT) Literacy for All Students. California: Libraries Unlimited.
Elmborg, J. K. 2002. “Teaching at the desk: Toward a Reference Pedagogy.” Portal, 2(3): 455-464.
Elmborg, J. K. 2011. “Libraries as the Spaces between Us: Recognizing and Valuing the Third Space.” Reference & User Services Quarterly, 50(4), 338-350.
ESSA. 2015. <http://www.ed.gov/essa> [cited 2018. 8. 10].
ESEA. 2018. <http://www.ed.gov/essa> [cited 2018. 8. 10].
Friesen, S. and D. Scott. 2013. Inquiry-Based Learning: A Review of the Research Literature. <http://www.galileo.org/focus-on-inquiry-lit-review.pdf> [cited 2018. 6. 28].
Harada, V. H. 2016. “A Practice-Centered Approach to Professional Development: Teacher-Librarian Collaboration in Capstone Projects.” School Library Research, 19.
Hill, J. R., and Hannafin, Michael J. 1995. Cognitive Strategies and the Use of a Hyperm edia Information System: An Exploratory Study. <https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED397799.pdf> [cited 2018. 6. 14].
Hughes-Hassell, S., A. Brasfield, and D. Dupree. 2012. “Making the Most of Professional Learning Communities.” Knowledge Quest, 41(2): 30–37.
Kuhlthau, C. C. 2013. “Inquiry Inspires Original Research.” School Library Monthly. 30(2): 5-8.
Kuhlthau, C. C. and L. K. Maniotes. 2010. “Building Guided Inquiry Teams for 21st-Century Learners.” School Library Monthly, 26(5): 18-21.
Kuhlthau, C. C., L. K. Maniotes, and A. K. Caspari. 2015. Guided inquiry: Learning in the 21st century. 2nd ed. CT: Libraries Unlimited.
Levitov, D. 2016. “School Libraries, Librarians, and Inquiry Learning.” Teacher Librarians, 43(3): 28-35.
Little, G. 2011. “Keeping Moving: Smart Phone and Mobile Technologies in the Academic Library.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37(3): 267–269.
Mokhtar, I. A. et al. 2009. “Proposing a 6+3 model for developing information literacy standards for schools: A case for Singapore.” Education for Information, 27: 81-101.
Newell, T. 2009. “Examining Information Problem-Solving Instruction: Dynamic Relationship Patterns Mediated by Distinct Instructional Methodologies.” School Libraries Worldwide, 15(2): 49-76.
OECD. 2016. PISA 2018 Draft Analytical Frameworks May 2016. <https://www.oecd.org/pisa/data/PISA-2018-draft-frameworks.pdf> [cited 2018. 8. 1].
Okemura, A. 2008. “Designing Inquiry-Based Science Units as Collaborative Partners.” School Library Media Activities Monthly, 25(3): 47-51.
Partnership for 21st Century Schools. 2009. Framework for 21st Century Learning. <http://www.p21.org/about-us/p21-framework> [cited 2018. 8. 10].
Sun, H. C. et al. 2011. “Role Changing for Librarians in the New Information Technology Era.” New Library World, 112(7/8): 321–333.
Klomsri, T. and M. Tedre. 2016. “Poor Information Literacy Skills and Practices as Barriers to Academic Performance.” Reference & User Services Quarterly, 55(4): 293-305.
Todd, R. J. 2012. “School Libraries and the Development of Intellectual Agency: Evidence from New Jersey.” School Library Research, 15.
Valenza, J. K. 2006. “They Might Be Gurus.” Teacher Librarian, 34(1): 18–26.
Walraven, A., S. Brand-Gruwel, and H. P. Boshuizen. 2008. “Information–Problem Solving: A Review of Problems Students Encounter and Instructional Solutions.” Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3): 623-648.
Williams, D. A. and L. Coles. 2007. “Evidence-Based Practice in Teaching: An Information Perspective.” Journal of Documentation, 63(6): 812–835.
Wolf, S., T. Brush, and J. Saye. 2003. “The Big Six Information Skills As a Metacognitive Scaffold: A Case Study.” School Library Media Research, 6.