Abstract

This paper analyzes how much the gap existed between the public group and expert group using future issues and future core technologies that are announced in government institutions based on ontology. We calculated gap with two groups’ point of view, one is expert groups’ ideas that are based on future hopeful technologies documents, and another is public people ideas that are based on documents of contest that is hosted by ‘Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (MSIP)’, and ‘Institute for Information & communications Technology Promotion (IITP)’. For calculating these, we suggested SDGM model. In the case of ETRI Meta-trend ICT Field, there is a little gap between expert group and public group, and another case that is XT (ETRI determined future technologies excluding ICT field) Field, the gap is increasing annually. Moreover, in the case of all ETRI Meta trend, the gap is bigger than ICT and XT field. We analyzed, also, KEIT’s future issues for generalizing this model. The gap existed between two groups. Utilizing SDGM model of this paper, people can interpret easily how much the gap exists between future technologies and issues that are announced in institutions.