open access
메뉴
open access
메뉴
ISSN : 1229-0688
어떤 이중관계는 물론 내담자에게 치명적인 해가 되기도 하지만, 어떤 이중관계는 내담자와 치료동맹을 이끌어 치료관계를 더 돈독하게 만들어서 내담자에게 유익을 줄 수 있다는 것이다. 이와 같은 주장은 2005년도 미국상담학회의 윤리강령이 10년 전에 비하여 비성적인 이중관계에 왜 더 구체적이고 관용적으로 변화되었는지를 설명해준다. 최근 학회들의 윤리강령에서는 모든 이중관계가 비윤리적인 것은 아니라고 강조하면서 내담자의 사적인 행사에 참여하는 것과 같은 행위는 내담자에게 오히려 유익을 줄 수 있으므로 구별하여 행동하라고 안내한다. 윤리강령의 과거와 현재를 비교해보면 최근 들어 상담관계의 경계에 대하여 다소 유연한 선택을 권유하는 변화를 감지할 수 있지만, 아직도 어떤 유형의 이중관계를 윤리적인 것으로 판단하고 어떤 상황을 비윤리적인 것으로 판단해야 할지 모호한 상태에서 전문가의 주관적인 판단에 의존할 수밖에 없음을 알게 된다.비성적인 이중관계에 대한 현실적 요구
Counselors may face the secondary or the third non-sexual relationships with their clients with intention or with circumstance. The study pursued to review ethical issues of non-sexual dual or multiple relationships without sexual intimacy. Even though ethical codes relating to dual relationships are provided by the associations of counseling, the guidelines are too general and vague to apply to every case of counseling situations and the studies in the mental health fields have shown somewhat contrary and confusing opinions of non-sexual dual relationships. The studies of sexual dual relationships have reached to a strongly consisting opinion that the relationship could be harmful to the clients. However, the researchers have asserted broad range of opinions about non-sexual dual relationships from it could be harmful to even both beneficial and therapeutic to the clients. Even ethical codes provided by associations of counseling have changed in a period of time in terms that to what extent non-sexual dual relationships should be considered to be ethical. In that sense, the study compared several ethical codes relating to non-sexual dual relationships, reviewed previous research articles, introduced ethical models to evaluate the relationships, and discussion and conclusion were made.
김정규 (1995). 게슈탈트 심리치료. 서울: 학지사.
이동식 (1985). 현대인의 정신건강. 서울: 불광출판사.
정범모 (2007). 그래, 이름은 뭔고? 서울: 나남출판사.
한규석 (1997). 사회심리학에서의 문화 비교 연구: 현황 및 세계화속의 과제. 한국심리학회 학술위원회 편, 심리학에서의 비교문화연구. pp. 87-172. 서울: 성원사.
홍경자 역 (1984). 이성을 통한 자기성장-지정요법(RET)의 사례집. 서울: 탐구당.
American Counseling Association (1995). ACA Code of Ethics & Standards of Practice.
American Counseling Association (2005). ACA Code of Ethics.
APA (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct.
Anderson, S, K., & Kitchener, K. S. (1996). Nonromantic, non-sexual posttherapy relationships between psychologists and former clients: An exploratory study of critical incidents. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 27, 59-66.
Barnett, J. E. & Yutrzenka, B. A. (2002). Nonsexual dual relationships in professional practice, with special applications to rural & military communities, in A. A. Lazarus & O. Zur (Eds.). Dual relationships and psychotherapy(pp.273-285). New York: Springer Publishing Co.
Borys, D. S. & Pope, K. S. (1989). Dual relationships between therapist and client: A national study of psychologists, psychiatrists, and social workers. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 20, 283-293.
Boyd-Franklin, N. & Bry, B. H. (2000). Reaching out in family therapy: Home-based school & community interventions. New York: Builford Press.
Brownlee, K. (1996). Ethics in community mental health care: The ethics of non-sexual dual relationships: A dilemma for the rural mental health professional. Community Mental Health Journal, 32(5). 497-503.
Catalano, S. (1997). The challenges of clinical practice in small or rural communities: Case studies in managing dual relationships in & outside of therapy. The Journal of Contemporary Psychology, 27(1), 23-35.
Cobia, D. C. & Boes, S. R. (2000, Summer). Professional disclosure statements and formal plans for supervision: Two strategies for minimizing the risk of ethical conflicts in post-master's supervision. Journal of Counseling & Development, 78(3), 293-296.
Congress, E. (2001, Spring/Summer). Dual relationships in social work education. Report on a national survey. Journal of Social Work Education, 37(2), 255-267.
Corey, G., Corey, M. S. & Callanan, P. (1998). Issues and ethics in the helping professions. pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Glosoff, H. L. & Kocet, M. M. (2005). Highlights of the 2005 ACA Code of Ethics.
Gottlieb, M. C. (1993). Avoiding exploitive dual relationships: A decision-making model. Psychotherapy, 30, 41-48.
Gutheil, T. (1989). Borderline personality disorder, boundary violations, and patient-therapist sex. American Journal of Psychiatry, 146(5), 597-602.
Hedges, I. E. (1993, July/August). In praise of dual relationships. Part II: Essential dual relatedness in developmental psychotherapy. The California Therapist, 5(4), 42-46.
Herlihy, B. & Corey, G. (1992). Dual relationships in counseling. Alexandria, VA: American Association for Counseling & Development.
Hill, M. R. (2001, July). Family therapists & religious communities: Negotiating dual relationships. Family relations. 50(3), 199-216.
Hurr, E. L. (1999). Counseling in a dynamic society: Contexts & practice for the 21st century. Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association.
Kagle, J. D. & Giebelhausen, P. N. (1994). Dual relationships and professional boundaries. Social Work, 39(2). 213-220.
Lawton, M. J. (1994, February). Friendship, foundation of therapeutic relationships, is imperiled. Addiction Letter, 10(2), 8.
Lazarus, A. A. (1994). How certain boundaries & ethics diminish therapeutic effectiveness. Ethics & Behavior, 4(3), 255-261.
Mamalaskis, P. M. (2001, July). Evaluating potential dual relationships: A response to Butler & Gardner. Family Relations, 50(3). 214-220.
Moleski, S. M. & Kiselica, M. S. (2005). Dual relationships: A continuum ranging from the destructive to the therapeutic. Journal of Counseling and Development, 83, 3-11.
Montgomery, M. J. & DeBell, C. (1997, October). Dual relationships & pastoral counseling: Asset or liability? Counseling & Values, 42(1). 30-41.
Nigro T. (2004). Counselors' experiences with problematic dual relationships. Ethics & Behavior, 14(1), 51-64.
Nickel, M. (2004). Professional boundaries: The dilemma of dual & multiple relationships in rural clinical practice. Counseling and Clinical Psychology Journal, 1(1). 17-22.
Pope, K. & Bouhoutsos, J. (1986). Sexual intimacy between therapists and patients. New York: Praeger.
Reamer, F. G. (2003, January). Boundary issues in social work: Managing dual relationships. Social Work, 48(1), 121-134.
Reilly, D. R. (2003). Not just a patient: The dangers of dual relationships. Canadian Journal of Rural Medicine, 8(1), 51-53.
Remley, T. P., Hermann, M., & Huey, W. W. (2003). Introduction. In T. P. Remley, M. Hermann, & W. W. Huey(Eds). Ethical and legal issues in school counseling (2nd ed., pp.13-16). Alexandria, VA: American School Counselor Association.
Smith, D., & Fitzpatrick, M. (1995). Patient- therapist boundary issues: An integrative review of theory and research. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 26, 499-506.
Stockman, A. E. (1990). Dual relationships in rural mental health practice: An ethical dilemma. Journal of Rural Community Psychology. 11(2), 31-45.
Taylor, M. L. (2001).Ethical issues for psychologists in pain management. Pain Medicine, 2(2), 147-154.
Tomm, K. (1993). The ethics of dual relationships. The California Therapist, 7-19.
Woititz, J. G. (1985). Struggle for intimacy. Health Communications, Inc.
Zur, O. & Lazarus, A. A. (2002). Six arguments against dual relationships & their rebuttals. In A. A. Lazarus & O. Zur (Eds.), Dual relationships & Psychotherapy(pp.3-19). New York: Springer Publishing Co.