open access
메뉴
open access
메뉴
본 연구는 Menefee, Day, Lopez와 McPherson(2014)이 슈퍼바이저에 대한 슈퍼바이지의 애착 전략을 측정하기 위해 개발한 슈퍼바이지 애착 전략 척도(SASS)를 국내 슈퍼바이지들을 대상으로 타당화하기 위해 실시되었다. 이를 위해 원척도의 22문항을 번안 및 역번안 작업을 거친 후 척도를 구성하였다. 자료 수집은 최근 2년 동안 한 명 이상의 슈퍼바이저에게 최소 3회 이상 슈퍼비전을 받은 경험이 있거나 현재 받고 있는 전국의 상담자 228명(남자 32명, 여자 195명, 성별무응답 1명)을 대상으로 이루어졌다. 자료를 바탕으로 SASS 요인구조의 적절성을 확보하기 위해 탐색적 및 확인적 요인분석을 실시하였고 신뢰도와 타당도를 분석하였다. 본 연구의 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 첫째, 본 연구에서는 원척도와 동일하게 2개의 하위요인(회피, 거절)이 추출되었고 내적일치도 역시 적절한 것으로 확인되었다. 둘째, SASS는 작업동맹 척도(WAI-T), 슈퍼비전 만족도(SSQ)와 부적 상관관계를 보였고, 역할갈등 역할모호 척도(RCRAI)와 친밀관계 경험척도(ECR)는 정적 상관관계를 보였다. 따라서 SASS는 유의한 공인, 수렴타당도를 나타낸다고 할 수 있다. 이러한 결과들은 SASS의 각 하위요인이 독립적으로 슈퍼바이지의 성인 애착을 설명하고 있음을 보여준다. 마지막으로 본 연구결과를 바탕으로 시사점과 제한점에 대해 논의하였다.
This study aimed to verify the reliability and validity of the Supervisee Attachment Strategies Scale (SASS; Menefee, Day, Lopez, & McPherson, 2014) to measure supervisee's adult attachment toward supervisor. 22 items of the original scale were translated from English to Korean. Data include 228 counselors who have received supervision at least three times in the last 2 years from more than one supervisor as well as counselors currently under supervision. In addition to correlation analysis, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were conducted to confirm factor structure property, reliability, and validity. Results showed the extraction of two sub-factors: Avoidance and Rejection, and showed proper Cronbach's alpha. SASS showed negative correlation with WAI-T and SSQ and positive correlation with RCRAI and ECR, which confirms the significant concurrent validity and convergent validity of SASS. Each sub-factor of SASS independently explained supervisee's adult attachment. Implications and limitations were discussed.
김동민 (2012). 음악치료 집단 수퍼비전에서수퍼바이지가 지각하는 애착유형, 자기효능감, 정서적 유대, 수치심, 평가불안 간의 관계. 한국음악치료학회, 14(2), 1-27.
김성현 (2004). 친밀 관계 경험 검사 개정판 타당화 연구: 확증적 요인분석과 문항 반응이론을 중심으로. 서울대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문.
문수백 (2003). 학위논문작성을 위한 연구방법의실제. 서울: 학지사.
박진희, 유미숙 (2011). 수퍼바이지의 성인 애착이 놀이치료 수퍼비전 과정에서 자기개방에 미치는 영향: 작업동맹의 매개효과를 중심으로. 상담학연구, 12(1), 129-142.
손은정, 유성경, 강지연, 임영선 (2006). 수퍼비전 작업 동맹과 상담자 경력 수준이 역할어려움과 수퍼비전 만족도에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 18(4), 695-711.
손은정, 유성경, 심혜원 (2003). 상담자의 자기성찰(reflection)과 전문성 발달. 상담학연구, 4(3), 367-380.
엄명용, 조성우 (2005). 사회복지실천과 척도개발. 서울: 학지사.
윤소영 (2006). 놀이치료자의 평가에 대한 두려움과 수퍼비전에서의 개방. 숙명여자대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문.
이수현, 김봉환 (2009). 슈퍼비전 기대 척도 개발 및 타당화. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 21(2), 417-437.
지승희, 주영아, 김영혜 (2014). 수퍼비전 경험과 되고 싶은 수퍼바이저 상에 관한 탐색적 연구. 상담학연구, 15(5), 1671-1693.
최수미, 조영일 (2013). 부정문항이 포함된 척도의 요인구조 및 방법효과 검증과 남녀간의 차이 비교: Rosenberg 자기존중감 척도를 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 32(3), 571-589.
최한나, 김창대 (2008). 좋은 수퍼비전 관계에대한 수퍼바이지의 인식 차원. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 20(1), 1-21.
한국상담심리학회 (2013). 상담심리사 수련과정시행세칙. 학회회칙.
한국상담학회 (2015). 전문상담사 자격규정. 학회규정집.
홍지영 (2008). 수퍼바이저 스타일이 수퍼비전작업동맹과 수퍼비전 만족도에 미치는 영향. 상담학연구. 9(4). 1489-1504.
Aasheim, L. L. (2012). Practical Clinical Supervision for Counselors: An Experiential Guide. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.
Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bahrick, A. (1989). Role induction for counselor trainees: effects on the supervisory working alliance. (Electronic Thesis or Dissertation). Retrieved from https://etd.ohiolink.edu/
Baldwin, M. W., Keelan, J. P., Fehr, B., Enns, V., & Koh-Rangarajoo, E. (1996). Socialcognitive conceptualization of attachment working models: Availability and accessibility effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 94-109.
Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adult: A test of a four-category model. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 226-244.
Bennett, S., BrintzenhofeSzoc, K., Mohr, J., & Saks, L. V. (2008). General and supervisionspecific attachment styles: Relations to student perceptions of field supervisors. Journal of Social Work Education, 44(2), 75-94.
Bernard, J. M., & Goodyear, R. K. (2004). Fundamentals of clinical supervision (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Biddle, B. J. (1979). Role theory: Expectations, identities, and behaviors. New York, NY:Academic Press.
Bordin, E. S. (1983). A working alliance based model of supervision. The Counseling Psychologist, 11(1), 35-42.
Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base. New York, NY:Basic Books.
Bradley, L. J., & Ladany, N. (2001). Counselor supervision: Principles, process, and practice (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. L. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46-76). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Chen, E. C., & Mallinckrodt, B. (2002). Attachment, group attraction, and self-other agreement in interpersonal circumplex problems and perceptions of group members. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6(4), 311-324.
Efstation, J. F., Patton, M. J., & Kardash, C. M. (1990). Measuring the working alliance in counselor supervision. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37(3), 322-329.
Ellis, M. V. (1991). Critical incidents in clinical supervision and in supervisor supervision:Assessing supervisory issues. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38(3), 342-349.
Epps, A. M. (1999). The Effect of attachment styles on the working alliance in counselor supervision. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 9949285).
Fisher, B. (1989). Differences between supervision of beginning and advanced therapists: Hogan’s hypothesis empirically revisited. The Clinical Supervisor, 7(1), 57-74.
Foster, J. T., Lichtenberg, J. W., & Peyton, V. (2007). The supervisory attachment relationship as a predictor of the professional development of the supervisee. Psychotherapy Research, 17(3), 343-350.
Friedlander, M. L., Keller, K. E., Peca-Baker, T. A., & Oik, M. E. (1986). Effects of role conflict on counselor trainees' self-statements, anxiety level, and performance. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 33(1), 73-77.
Gunn, J. E., & Pistole, M. C. (2012). Trainee supervisor attachment: explaining the alliance and disclosure in supervision. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 6(4), 229-237.
Hamilton, C. E. (2000). Continuity and discontinuity of attachment from infancy through adolescence. Child Development, 71(3), 690-694.
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511-524
Holloway, E. L. (1987). Developmental models of supervision: Is it development? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 18(3), 138-140.
Holloway, E. L. (1995). Clinical supervision: A systems approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Holloway, E. L. (1992). Supervision: A way of teaching and learning. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Handbook of counseling psychology. (pp. 177-214). New York, NY:Wiley.
Holloway, E. L., & Neufeldt, S. A. (1995). Supervision: Its contributions to treatment efficacy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63(2), 207-213.
Horvath, A. O., Del Re, A. C., Flückiger, C., & Symonds, D. (2011). Alliance in individual psychotherapy. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 48(1), 9-16.
Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Hazan, C. (1994). Attachment styles and close relationships: a four-year prospective study. Personal Relationships, 1(2), 123-142.
Ladany, N. (2002). Psychotherapy supervision; How dressed is the emperor, Psychotherapy Bulletin, 37, 14-18.
Ladany, N., & Friedlander, M. L. (1995). The relationship between the supervisory working alliance and trainees’ experience of role conflict and role ambiguity. Counselor Education &Supervision, 34(3), 220-231.
Ladany, N., Friedlander, M. L., & Nelson, M. L. (2005). Critical events in psychotherapy supervision:An interpersonal approach. Washington, DC:American Psychological Association.
Ladany, N., Hill, C. E., Corbett, M. M., & Nutt, E. A. (1996). The nature, extent, and importance of what psychotherapy trainees do not disclose to their supervisors. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43(1), 10-24.
Ladany, N., & Walker, J. A. (2003). Supervisor self-disclosure: Balancing the uncontrollable narcissist with the indomotable altruist. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 59(5), 611-621
Lainas, H. L. (2014). The relationship between supervisory working alliance and sueprvisses’ client outcomes (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3685810).
Lambert, M., & Barley, D. (2001). Research summary on the therapeutic relationship and psychotherapy outcome. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 38(4), 357-361.
Larsen, D. L., Attkisson, C. C., Hargreaves, W. A., & Nguyen, T. D. (1979). Assessment of client/patient satisfaction: Development of a general scale. Evaluation and Program Planning, 2(3), 197-207.
Lizzo, A., Strokes, L., & Wilson, K. (2005). Approaches to learning in professional supervision: Supervisee perceptions of processes and outcome. Studies in Continguing Education, 27(3), 239-256.
Mehr, K., Ladany, N., & Caskie, G. (2010). Trainee nondisclosure in supervision: What are they not telling you? Counselling &Psychotherapy Research, 10(2), 103-113.
Menefee, D. S., Day, S. X., Lopez, F. G., & McPherson, R. H. (2014). Preliminary development and validation of the supervisee attachment strategies scales(SASS). Journal of Counseling Psychology, 61(2), 232-240.
Nasser, F., & Takahashi, T. (2003). The effect of using item parcels on ad goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: An example using Sarason’s reactions to tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 16(1), 75-97.
Neswald-McCalip, R. (2001). Development of the secure counselor: case examples supporting Pistole & Watkins’s(1995) discussion of attachment theory in counseling supervision. Counselor Education and Supervision, 41(1), 18-27.
Olk, M., & Friedlander, M. L. (1992). Trainees’experiences of role conflict and role ambiguity in supervisory relationships. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39(3), 389-397.
Pistole, M. C., & Fitch, J. C. (2008). Attachment theory in supervision: A critical incident experience. Counselor Education and Supervision, 47(3), 193-205.
Pistole, M. C., & Watkins, C. E. (1995). Attachment theory, counseling process, and supervision. The Counseling Psychologist, 23(3), 457-478.
Riggs, S. A., & Bretz, K. M. (2006). Attachment processes in the supervisory relationship: An exploratory investigation. Professional Psychology:Research and Practice, 37(5), 558-566.
Ronnestad, M. H., & Skovholt, T. M. (1993). Supervision of beginning and advanced graduate students of counseling and psychotherapy. Journal of Counseling and Development, 71(4), 396-405.
Shim, S. S. (2002). Cultural landscapes of pastoral counseling in Asia: The case of Korea with a supervisory perspective. American Journal of Pastoral Counseling, 5(1), 77-97.
Skovholt, T. M., & Ronnestad, M. H. (1992). Themes in therapist and counselor development. Journal of Counseling &Development, 70(4), 505-515.
Stoltenberg, C. D., & Delworth, U. (1987). Supervising counselors and therapists: A developmental perspective. San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Multivariate statistics. Needham Heights, MA:Allyn.
Tanaka, S. J. (1993). Multifaceted conceptions of fit in structural equation model. In K. A. Bollen & S. J. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation model (pp. 10-39). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Ward, C. C., & House, R. M. (1998). Counseling supervision: A reflective model. Counselor Education & Supervision, 38(1), 23-33.
Watkins, C. E. (1995). Pathological attachment styles in psychotherapy supervision. Psychotherapy, 32(2), 333-340.
Watkins, C. E. (1998). Psychotherapy supervision in the 21st century: Some pressing needs and impressing possibilities. Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research, 7(2), 93-101.
West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with non-normal variables: Problems and remedies. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues and Applications (pp. 56-75). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
White, V. E., & Queener, J. (2003). Supervisor and supervisee attachments and social provisions related to the supervisory working alliance. Counselor Education & Supervision, 42(3), 203-218.
Wiley, M. O., & Ray, P. B. (1986). Counseling supervision by developmental level. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 33(4), 439-445.
Worthen, V., & McNeill, B. W. (1996). A phenomenological investigation of “good”supervision events. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43(1), 25-34.
Yourman, D. B., & Farber, B. A. (1996). Nondisclosure and distortion in psychotherapy supervision. Psychotherapy, 33(4), 567-575.
