open access
메뉴
open access
메뉴
대인관계 맥락에 따라 경계선 성격장애 경향 집단의 대상표상이 변화하는 양상을 파악하기 위한 목적으로 본 연구를 수행하였다. 대학생 1,054명을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하여 경계선 성격장애 경향 집단(27명)과 통제집단(28명)을 선정하였다. 연구 참가자에게 중립 상황과 대인관계 스트레스 상황을 유발한 다음에 주제통각검사(TAT)를 실시하였고, TAT 프로토콜을 사회인지와 대상관계 척도(SCORS-G)로 평정하여 대상표상의 수준을 파악하였다. 연구 결과, 경계선 성격장애 경향 집단은 통제집단에 비해 대상표상이 질적으로 손상되어 있었고, 정서적 측면에서의 결함에 비해 인지적 측면에서의 결함이 두드러졌다. 특히, 경계선 성격장애 경향 집단은 중립 상황에 비해 대인관계 스트레스 상황에서 대상표상의 인지적 측면이 더욱 손상되었으나, 대상표상의 정서적 측면은 상황에 따른 변화가 거의 나타나지 않았다. 본 연구의 결과는 경계선 성격장애 환자가 대인관계에서 스트레스를 경험하게 되면 인지적 측면을 중심으로 대상표상이 손상되고, 이로 인해 자신과 타인의 내적상태와 사회적 상호작용을 이해하는 데 어려움을 겪게 되어 성격 전반에 심리적 불안정성을 나타낼 수 있음을 시사한다.
This study examined the effect of interpersonal stress on emotional experiences and object representations in individuals with Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) tendencies. A total of 1,054 undergraduate students completed a survey to identify BPD tendencies. Participants with BPD tendencies (n=27) and a control group (n=28) were selected. The TAT was administered under both neutral and interpersonally stressful situations and the SCORS-G was used to assess the quality of object representations. The group with BPD tendencies displayed more prominent deficits in cognitive aspects than affective aspects of object representations than the control group. The cognitive aspects of object representations in individuals with BPD tendencies were more significantly affected in interpersonally stressful situations than in neutral situations, whereas the emotional aspects did not differ across situations. The results suggest that BPD patients experiencing interpersonal stress may have a reduced ability to understand the internal states of self and others, and social interactions, which may contribute to psychological instability.
강희명, 이영호 (2014). 경계선 성격장애 성향자의 이분법적 사고와 단일차원적 사고. 인지행동치료, 14(1), 79-101.
김상선, 신민섭, 이훈진 (2007). 경계선 성격장애 성향자의 자기 및 타인 표상과 지각된 부모 양육행동. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 26(3), 703-715.
김영환, 김지혜, 오상우, 임영란, 홍상황 (2001). PAI 표준화연구. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 20(2), 311-329.
김영환, 오상우, 홍상황, 박은영 (2009). PAI의 임상적 해석. 서울: 학지사.
김은희, 이인혜 (2016). 아동 청소년기 외상경험과 경계선 성격 특성의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 28(4), 1003- 1022.
노상선, 조용래 (2015). 경계선 성격장애 성향자에 대한 자기자비 함양 프로그램의 적용: 사례연구. 한국심리학회지: 임상심리 연구와 실제, 1(1), 65-93.
박세란, 이훈진 (2015). 자기자비 증진 프로그램 개발 및 효과 검증. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 27(3), 583-611.
박준호, 서영석 (2010). 대학생을 대상으로 한 한국판 지각된 스트레스 척도 타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 29(3), 611-629.
박진미, 서수균, 이훈진 (2007). 경계선 성격장애 성향자의 부적응적 정서조절. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 26(3), 717-730.
박홍석, 이정미 (2016). 정적 정서 부적 정서 척도(PANAS)의 타당화. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 35(4), 617-641.
신민섭, 박세란 (2009). 로샤 검사에서 경계선 성격장애의 대상관계. 한국심리치료학회지, 1(1), 17-29.
이영호, 송종용 (1991). BDI, SDS, MMPI-D 척도의 신뢰도 및 타당도에 대한 연구. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 10(1), 98-113.
이종환, 곽호완, 이상일, 장문선 (2013). 경계선 성격장애 성향군의 정서조절 능력. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 32(3), 543-565.
이종환, 임종민, 장문선 (2018). 주제통각검사를 활용한 사회인지와 대상관계 척도 타당화 연구. Korean Journal of Clinical Psycology, 37(4), 540-557.
이현희, 김은정, 이민규 (2003). 한국판 정적 정서 및 부적 정서 척도(Positive Affect and Negative Affect Schedule; PANAS)의 타당화 연구. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 22(4), 935-946.
장문선, 이종환 (2016). TAT와 기타 스토리텔링 평가의 핵심. 서울: 박학사.
하수홍, 장문선 (2013). 정서적 학대 경험과 경계선 성격특성 간의 관련성에서 거절민감성, 사회적지지의 매개효과. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 25(4), 833-852.
한덕웅, 이장호, 전겸구 (1996). Spielberger의 상태-특성 불안검사 Y형의 개발. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 1(1), 1-14.
황성훈, 이훈진 (2011). 경계선 성격 성향자들의 이분법적 사고와 자기 구조 특성. 인지행동치료, 11(2), 75-94.
Allen, J. G., & Fonagy, P. (2006). Handbook of mentalization-based treatment. In J. Holmes (Eds.) Mentalizing from a psychoanalytic perspective: What’s new (pp. 31-49). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders(5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Pub.
Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: a test of a four-category model. Journal of personality and social psychology, 61(2), 226-244.
Bateman, A., & Fonagy, P. (2010). Mentalization based treatment for borderline personality disorder. World psychiatry, 9(1), 11-15.
Beck, A. T. (1967). Depression: denial, experimental, and theoretical aspects. New York: Haper & Row.
Bion, W. R. (1962). Learning from experience. London: Heineman.
Bion, W. R. (1967). Second Thoughts. New York: Jason Aronson.
Braungart‐Rieker, J. M., Garwood, M. M., Powers, B. P., & Wang, X. (2001). Parental sensitivity, infant affect, and affect regulation: Predictors of later attachment. Child development, 72(1), 252-270.
Brown, G. L., Ebert, M. H., Goyer, P. F., Jimerson, D. C., Klein, W. J., Bunney, W. E., & Goodwin, F. K. (1982). Aggression, suicide, and serotonin: Relationships of CSF amine metabolites. The American journal of psychiatry, 139(6), 741-746.
Busch, F. N. (2008). Mentalization: Theoretical considerations, research findings, and clinical implications. In M. A. Bouchard & S. Lecours (Eds.) Contemporary approaches to mentalization in the light of Freud’s project (pp. 103-129). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
Choi-Kain, L. W., & Gunderson, J. G. (2008). Mentalization: Ontogeny, assessment, and application in the treatment of borderline personality disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 165(9), 1127-1135.
Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of health and social behavior, 24(4), 385-396.
Elices, M., Soler, J., Fernández, C., Martín-Blanco, A., Portella, M. J., Pérez, V., ..., & Pascual, J. C. (2012). Physiological and self-assessed emotional responses to emotion-eliciting films in borderline personality disorder. Psychiatry Research, 200(2-3), 437-443.
Fonagy, P., & Bateman, A. (2006). Progress in the treatment of borderline personality disorder. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 188(1), 1-3.
Fonagy, P., & Luyten, P. (2009). A developmental, mentalization-based approach to the understanding and treatment of borderline personality disorder. Development and psychopathology, 21(4), 1355-1381.
Fossati, A., Somma, A., Krueger, R. F., Markon, K. E., & Borroni, S. (2017). On the relationships between DSM‐5 dysfunctional personality traits and social cognition deficits: A study in a sample of consecutively admitted Italian psychotherapy patients. Clinical psychology & psychotherapy, 24(6), 1421-1434.
Gunderson, J. G. (2009). Borderline personality disorder: A clinical guide. American Psychiatric Pub.
Gunderson, J. G., & Lyons-Ruth, K. (2008). BPD’s interpersonal hypersensitivity phenotype: A gene-environment-developmental model. Journal of Personality Disorders, 22(1), 22-41.
Gunderson, J. G., Fruzzetti, A., Unruh, B., & Choi-Kain, L. (2018). Competing theories of borderline personality disorder. Journal of personality disorders, 32(2), 148-167.
Haley, D. W., & Stansbury, K. (2003). Infant stress and parent responsiveness: Regulation of physiology and behavior during still‐face and reunion. Child development, 74(5), 1534-1546.
Harari, H., Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Ravid, M., & Levkovitz, Y. (2010). Double dissociation between cognitive and affective empathy in borderline personality disorder. Psychiatry research, 175(3), 277-279.
Hartocollis, P. (1977). Borderline personality disorders: The concept, the syndrome, the patient. In O. F. Kernberg (Eds.) The structural diagnosis of borderline personality organization (pp. 87-121). New York, NY: International University Press.
Kernberg, O. (1967). Borderline personality organization. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 15(3), 641-685.
Kernberg, O. F. (1976). Object relations theory and clinical psychoanalysis. New York: Jason Aronson.
Kochanska, G., & Murray, K. T. (2000). Mother-child mutually responsive orientation and conscience development: From toddler to early school age. Child development, 71(2), 417-431.
Kochanska, G., Coy, K. C., & Murray, K. T. (2001). The development of self‐regulation in the first four years of life. Child development, 72(4), 1091-1111.
Koós, O., & Gergely, G. (2001). A contingency- based approach to the etiology of ‘disorganized’ attachment: The ‘flickering switch’ hypothesis. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 65(3), 397-410.
Lawrence, K. A., Chanen, A. M., & Allen, J. S. (2011). The effect of ostracism upon mood in youth with borderline personality disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25(5), 702-714.
Levy, K. N. (2005). The implications of attachment theory and research for understanding borderline personality disorder. Development and psychopathology, 17(4), 959-986.
Linehan, M. (1993). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Links, P. S., & Heslegrave, R. J. (2000). Prospective studies of outcome: Understanding mechanisms of change in patients with borderline personality disorder. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 23(1), 137-150.
Mahler, M. S. (1952). On child psychosis and schizophrenia: autistic and symbiotic infantile psychoses. The psychoanalytic study of the child, 7(1), 286-305.
Maner, J. K., DeWall, C. N., Baumeister, R. F., & Schaller, M. (2007). Does social exclusion motivate interpersonal reconnection? Resolving the" porcupine problem.". Journal of personality and social psychology, 92(1), 42-55.
Marra, T. (2006). 변증법적 행동치료: 개인 치료 현장에서 실제적이고 포괄적인 안내서[Dialectical behavior therapy in private practice]. (신민섭 외 역). 서울: 시그마프레스. (원전은 2005에 출판)
Morey, L. C. (1991). Personality assessment inventory. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Murray, H. A. (1943). Thematic apperception test. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). The Social Monitoring System: Enhanced Sensitivity to Social Cues as an Adaptive Response to Social Exclusion. In K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), Sydney Symposium of Social Psychology series. The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying (pp. 213-226). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Preißler, S., Dziobek, I., Ritter, K., Heekeren, H. R., & Roepke, S. (2010). Social cognition in borderline personality disorder: evidence for disturbed recognition of the emotions, thoughts, and intentions of others. Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 4:182. doi: 10.3389/ fnbeh.2010.00182
Renneberg, B., Herm, K., Hahn, A., Staebler, K., Lammers, C. H., & Roepke, S. (2012). Perception of social participation in borderline personality disorder. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 19(6), 473-480.
Schaefer, A., Nils, F., Sanchez, X., & Philippot, P. (2010). Assessing the effectiveness of a large database of emotion-eliciting films: A new tool for emotion researchers. Cognition and Emotion, 24(7), 1153-1172.
Shea, M. T. (2007). Life events and relapase in personality disorders. Presented at the American Pyschiatric Association Annual Meeting. https://www.psychiatry.org/psychiatrists/search-directories-databases/library-and-archive에서 2018, 10, 18 인출.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 420-428.
Spielberger, C. D. (1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory: STAI (Form Y). Palo Alto, CA: Counseling Psychologists Press.
Staebler, K., Renneberg, B., Stopsack, M., Fiedler, P., Weiler, M., & Roepke, S. (2011). Facial emotional expression in reaction to social exclusion in borderline personality disorder. Psychological medicine, 41(9), 1929-1938.
Stein, M. B., Slavin-Mulford, J., Siefert, C. J., Sinclair, S. J., Smith, M., Chung, W. J., ..., & Blais, M. A. (2015). External validity of SCORS-G ratings of Thematic Apperception Test narratives in a sample of outpatients and inpatients. Rorschachiana., 36(1), 58-81.
Stein, M., & Slavin-Mulford, J. (2017). The Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale-Global Rating Method (SCORS-G): A Comprehensive Guide for Clinicians and Researchers. New York, NY: Routledge.
Stein, M., Hilsenroth, M., Slavin-Mulford, J., & Pinsker, J. (2011). Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale: Global Rating Method (SCORS-G; 4th ed.). Unpublished manuscript, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Veen, G., & Arntz, A. (2000). Multidimensional dichotomous thinking characterizes borderline personality disorder. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 24(1), 23-45.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of personality and social psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070.
Westen, D., Lohr, N., Silk, K. R., Gold, L., & Kerber, K. (1990). Object relations and social cognition in borderlines, major depressives, and normals: A Thematic Apperception Test analysis. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2(4), 355-364.
Williams, K. D., & Jarvis, B. (2006). Cyberball: A program for use in research on interpersonal ostracism and acceptance. Behavior research methods, 38(1), 174-180.
