바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1225-598X
  • E-ISSN2982-6292

From Information to Knowledge: The Information Literacy Conundrum

From Information to Knowledge: The Information Literacy Conundrum

한국문헌정보학회지 / Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2010, v.44 no.4, pp.131-153
https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2010.44.4.131
Ross J. Todd (The State University of New Jersey)

Abstract

The fusion of learning, information, and technology presents dynamic challenges for all librarians, educators and students in 21st century libraries and schools. At the heart of this fusion is the growth of a pervasive, integrated information environment characterized by vast quantities of digital content, open choice, collaborative and participatory digital spaces, and the transition of the web environments from consumption of information to creation of information. This environment heralds important opportunities for librarians and teachers to rethink, re-imagine and recreate a dynamic approaches to information literacy instruction. Drawing on an extensive body of research undertaken through the Center for International Scholarship in School Libraries (CISSL), and published research on both information literacy and constructivist learning, this paper provides a critical examination of the current status of information literacy: its multiple conceptualizations, competing models, viewpoints, and its operationalizations in educational and library environments. The paper will challenge information literacy practices which center on simplistic, reductionist approaches to information literacy development, and the separation of information process and knowledge content. In particular it will address apparent contradictions in espoused conceptions of information literacy which revolve around “knowledge”: knowledge construction, critical thinking, problem solving and the development of knowledgeable people; and information literacy practices which revolve around “information”: a predominant focus on skills of access and evaluation of resources and with less attention given to engaging with found information to develop deep knowledge and understanding. The paper will present a series of challenges for moving forward with information literacy agendas in libraries and schools. 

keywords
Information Literacy, Information Use, Evidence-based Librarianship, Information Literacy, Information Use, Evidence-based Librarianship

참고문헌

1.

American Association of School Librarians and Association for Educational Communications in Technology. 1998. Information power: Building partnerships for learning. Chicago: American Library Association.

2.

American Library Association. 1989. “Presidential Committee on Information Literacy.” Final Report. Chicago: ALA.

3.

American Library Association. 2000. “Information literacy competency standards for higher education.” [online]. [cited 2010. 10]. <http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/standards/informationliteracycompetency.cfm>.

4.

American Association of School Librarians. 2007. “Standards for the 21st-Century Learner." [online]. [cited 2010. 9. 10]. <http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/aasl/guidelinesandstandards/learningstandards/standards.cfm>.

5.

Andretta, S. 2007a. “Information literacy: The functional literacy for the 21st century." S. Andretta, Ed. Challenge and Change: Information literacy for the 21st Century, 3-13. Adelaide: Auslib Press.

6.

Argyris, C., & Schon, D. 1974. Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

7.

Behrens, S. 1994. “A conceptual analysis and historical overview of information literacy." College and Research Libraries, 59: 309-322.

8.

Beyer, J., & Trice, H. 1982. “The utilization process: a conceptual framework and synthesis of empirical findings." Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(4): 591-622.

9.

Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. 2002. The social life of information. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation.

10.

Bruce, C. 1997a. “The relational approach: a new model for information literacy." The New Review of Information and Library Research, 3: 1-22.

11.

Bruce, C. 1997b. The seven faces of information literacy. Adelaide: Auslib Press.

12.

Bruce, C. 2000. “Information literacy research: Dimensions of the emerging collective consciousness." Australian Academic Research Libraries, 31: 91-109.

13.

Candy, P. 1993. “The problem of currency: Information literacy in the context of Australia as a learning society." Australian Library Journal, 42: 278-299.

14.

Davies, Philip. 1999. “What is evidence-based education?" British Journal of Educational Studies, 47(2): 108-121.

15.

Dervin, B. 1983. “An overview of Sense-Making research: Concepts, methods, and results to date." The annual meeting of the International Communication Association. Dallas: TX.

16.

Dervin, B. 1992. “From the Mind's Eye of the User: the sense-Making qualitativequantitative methodology." J. Glazier, & R. Powell Ed. Qualitative research in information management, 61-84. Englewood, Co.: Libraries Unlimited.

17.

Dewald, N. 1999. “Transporting good library instruction practices into the web environment: An analysis of online tutorials." Journal of Academic Librarianship, 25: 26-32.

18.

Doty, P. 2003. “Bibliographic instruction: The digital divide and resistance of users to technologies." [online]. [cited 2010. 9. 10]. <http://www.ischool.utexas.edu/~l38613dw/website_spring_03/readings/BiblioInstruction.html>.

19.

Doyle, C. 1992. “Outcome measures for information literacy within the National Education Goals of 1990." Final Report to the Forum on Information Literacy. Summary of Findings.

20.

Doyle, C. 1994. Information literacy in an information society: A concept for the information age. Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearing house on Information and Technology.

21.

Edward K. Owusu-Ansah. 2005. “Debating definitions of information literacy: enough is enough!" Library Review, 54(6): 366-374.

22.

Eldredge, Jonathan D. 2000. “Evidence-based librarianship: an overview." Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 88(4): 289-302. [online]. [cited]. <http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=35250&blobtype=pdf>.

23.

Feldman, M., & March, J. 1981. “Information organisations as signal and symbol." Administrative Science Quarterly, 26: 171-186.

24.

Foster, S. 1993. “Information literacy: Some misgivings." Academic Libraries, 24: 344-345.

25.

Gibson, C. 2007. “Information literacy and IT fluency: Convergences and divergences." Reference & User Services Quarterly, 46: 23-26, 59.

26.

Horton, F. 2008. Understanding information literacy: A primer. Paris: UNESCO.

27.

Huberman, M. 1983. “Recipes for busy kitchens: a situational analysis of routine knowledge use in schools." Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 4(4): 478-510.

28.

Hutchinson, J. 1995. “Amultimethod analysis of knowledge use in social policy: research use in decisions affecting the welfare of children." Science Communication, 17(1): 90-106.

29.

IFLA. 2006. “Guidelines on information literacy for lifelong learning." [online]. [cited 2010. 9. 10]. <http://www.ifla.org/VII/s42/pub/IL-Guidelines2006.pdf>.

30.

IFLA/UNESCO. 2006. “School Library Manifesto: The school library in teaching and learning for all." [online]. [cited 2010. 9. 10]. <http://www.ifla.org/VII/s11/pubs/manifest.htm>.

31.

Kerr, P. 2010. Conceptions and practice of information literacy in academic libraries: Espoused theories and theories-in-use. Ph.D. Diss., The State University of New Jersey.

32.

Kersting, Karen. 2003. “Bolstering evidence-based education." Monitor on Psychology, 34(9). [online]. [cited]. <http://www.apa.org/monitor/oct03/bolstering.html>.

33.

Kuhlthau, C. 2004. Seeking meaning: A process approach to library and information services. Connecticut: Libraries Unlimited.

34.

Kuhlthau, C., Caspari, A., & Maniotes, L. 2007. Guided Inquiry:Learning in the 21st Century. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.

35.

Kuhlthau, C.,Heinstrom, J., & Todd, R. 2008. “The ‘information search process' revisited: Is the model still useful?" IR Information Research, 13(4). [online]. [cited 2010. 9. 10]. <http://InformationR.net/ir/13-4/paper355.html>.

36.

Langford, L. 1998. “Information literacy: A clarification." School Libraries Worldwide, 4(1): 59-72.

37.

Larsen, J. 1980. “Knowledge utilization: what is it?" Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 1(3): 421-442.

38.

Limberg, L. 1999. “Experiencing information seeking and learning: A study of the interaction between two phenomena." Information Research, 5(1). [online]. [cited 2006. 10. 23]. <http://informationr.net/ir/5-1/paper68.html>.

39.

Lloyd, A. 2005. “Information literacy: Different contexts, different concepts, different truths?" Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 37: 82-88.

40.

Lloyd, A. 2006. “Information literacy landscapes: An emerging picture." Journal of Documentation, 62(5): 570-583.

41.

Lupton, M. 2004. The learning connection: Information literacy and the student experience. Adelaide: Auslib Press.

42.

Machlup, F. 1979. “Uses, value, and benefits of knowledge." Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 1(1): 62-81.

43.

Mackey, T., & Jacobson, T. 2010. “Reframing Information Literacy as a metaliteracy." the Information Literacy Research Seminar of CoLIS 7 (the Seventh International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science), June 21-24, 2010. London: the University College London.

44.

Markless, S., & Streatfield, D. 2007. “Three decades of information literacy: redefining the parameters." S. Andretta, Ed. Change and challenge: Information literacy for the 21st century. Adelaide: Auslib Press.

45.

National Forum on Information Literacy. 2008. “National Forum on Information Literacy." [online]. [cited 2008. 8. 12]. <http://www.infolit.org/>.

46.

Pelz, D. 1978. “Some expanded perspectives on use of social science in public policy." M. Yinger, & S. Cutler, Eds. Major social issues: a multidisciplinary view, 346-357. New York: Free Press.

47.

Phenix, P. 1986. Realms of meaning: Philosophy of the curriculum for general education. Ventura, California: Ventura County Superintendent of Schools Office.

48.

Prague Declaration. 2003. “Towards an information literate society." [online]. [cited 2010. 9. 10]. <http://portal.unesco.org/ci/en/ev.php-URL_ID=19636&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html>.

49.

Reece, G. 2007. “Critical thinking and cognitive transfer: Implications for the development of online information literacy tutorials." Research Strategies, 20: 482-493.

50.

Shapiro, J., & Hughes, S. 1996. “Information Literacy as a Liberal Art: Enlightenment proposals for a new curriculum." Educom Review, 31(2). [online]. [cited 2010. 9. 10]. <http://net.educause.edu/apps/er/review/reviewArticles/31231.html>.

51.

Sharkey, J. 2005. “Towards information fluency: applying a different model to an information literacy course." Reference Services Review, 34: 71-85.

52.

Snavely, L., & Cooper, N. 1997. “The information literacy debate." The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 23(1): 9-14.

53.

Stern, C. 2002. “Information literacy unplugged: teaching information literacy without technology." White paper prepared for UNESCO, the US NCLIS and National Forum for Information Literacy.

54.

Taylor, R. 1991. “Information use environments." B. Dervin, & M. Voigt Eds. Progress in communication sciences. X: 217-255. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.

55.

Todd, R. 1995. “Information literacy: A sensemaking approach to learning." D. Booker, Ed. The learning link: Information literacy in practice. Adelaide: Auslib Press.

56.

Todd, R. 1999. “Back to our beginnings: Information utilization, Bertram Brookes and the Fundamental Equation of Information Science." Information Processing & Management, 35: 851-870.

57.

Todd, R. 2000a. “Information Literacy: concept, conundrum and challenge." Di Booker, Ed. Concept, Challenge, Conundrum: From Library Skills to Information Literacy. Proceedings of the Fourth National Information Literacy Conference3-5 December 1999, 25-34. University of South Australia. Adelaide: University of South Australia Library.

58.

Todd, R. 2000b. “A theory of information literacy: In-formation and outward looking." C. Bruce, & P Candy Eds. Information literacy around the world: Advances in programs and research. NewSouth Wales, Australia: Centre for Information Studies, Charles Stuart University, 163-165.

59.

Todd, R. 2001. “Transitions for preferred futures of school libraries." Keynote paper to the International Association of School Libraries (IASL) conference, Auckland, Symposium 2001. [online]. [cited]. <http://www.iasl-slo.org/virtualpaper2001.html>.

60.

Todd, R. 2006. “From information to knowledge: Charting and measuring changes in students’ knowledge of a curriculum topic." Information Research, 11(4). [online]. [cited 2010. 9. 10]. <http://informationr.net/ir/11-4/paper264.html>.

61.

Todd, R. 2008. “Building capacity and continuous improvement of school libraries: The Delaware experience." Paper presented at the Annual Conference and Research Forum of the International Association of School Librarianship, August 2008. Berkeley, California: Transliteracy Research Group. [online]. [cited 2010. 9. 10]. <http://nlabnetworks.typepad.com/transliteracy/>.

62.

UNESCO 2008. “UNESCO and Information literacy.” [online]. [cited 2010. 9. 10]. <http://portal.unesco.org>.

63.

UNESCO, IFLA, & NFIL. 2005. “Alexandria Proclamation of information literacy and lifelong learning." [online]. [cited 2010. 9. 10]. <http://portal.unesco.org>.

64.

Vakkari, P. 1997. “Information seeking in context:A challenging metatheory." P. Vakkari, R. Savolainen, & B. Dervin., Eds. Information Seeking in Context.Proceedings of an international conference on research in information needs, seeking and use in different contexts. 14-16 August, 1996. Tampere, Finland, London: Taylor Graham.

65.

Weiss, C. 1986. “Perspectives on knowledge use in national policy making." G. Beal, W. Dissanayake, & S. Konoshima, Eds. Knowledge generation, exchange and utilization. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

66.

Zurkowski, P. 1974. The information service environment relationships and priorities. Washington DC: National Commission on Libraries and Information Sciences.

한국문헌정보학회지