바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.45 No.2
Citation Share

A Study on Document Citation Indicators Based on Citation Network Analysis

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science / Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2011, v.45 no.2, pp.119-143
https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2011.45.2.119

(2011). A Study on Document Citation Indicators Based on Citation Network Analysis. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 45(2), 119-143, https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2011.45.2.119
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

This study identifies the characteristics of recent citation-based indicators for assessing a single paper in the context of their co-relationships. Five predefined indicators were examined with three variants of h-index which are convened in this study; the formers are PageRank, SCEAS Rank, CCI, f-value, and single paper h-index and the latters are h_S-index, h1-index, and h_S1-index. The correlation analysis and cluster analysis were performed to group the indicators by common characteristics, after which the indicators were calculated with the dataset from KSCI DB. The results show statistical evidence that distinguishes h-index type indicators from others. The characteristics of the indicators were verified with citation frequency factors using correlation analysis. Finally, the implications for applications and further studies are discussed.

keywords
인용분석, 문헌 인용 네트워크, 영향력 지수, 페이지랭크, h-지수, 네트워크 분석, 단일 문헌 평가, Citation Analysis, Document Citation Network, Impact Factor, PageRank, h-Index, Network Analysis, Single Paper Assessment, Citation Analysis, Document Citation Network, Impact Factor, PageRank, h-Index, Network Analysis, Single Paper Assessment

Reference

1.

김판준, 이재윤. 2007. 연구 영역 분석을 위한 디스크립터 프로파일링에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지 , 24(4): 285-303.

2.

김판준, 이재윤. 2010. 학술지 영향력 측정을 위한 h-지수의 응용에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지 ,27(1): 269-287.

3.

김희전, 조현양. 2010. 저자동시인용분석과 저자서지결합분석에 의한 지적 구조 분석. 정보관리학회지 , 27(3): 283-306.

4.

유재복, 정영미. 2009a. 특허 인용에 영향을 미치는 요인 분석. 정보관리학회지 , 27(1): 103-118.

5.

유재복, 정영미. 2009b. 특허인용 예측모형 구축에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지 , 27(4): 239-258

6.

유종덕, 최은주. 2011. 저자프로파일링분석과 저자동시인용분석의 유용성 비교 검증. 정보관리학회지 , 28(1): 123-144

7.

윤희윤, 김신영. 2005. 학술지 영향계수와 연구업적 평가비중의 상관성 분석. 정보관리연구 ,36(3): 1-25.

8.

이재윤. 2006 연구성과 측정을 위한 h-지수의 개량에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지 , 23(3): 167-186.

9.

이재윤. 2008. 서지적 저자결합분석: 연구동향 분석을 위한 새로운 접근. 정보관리학회지 , 25(1):173-190.

10.

정경희. 1999. 인용분석의 발전과 그에 대한 비판. 정보관리연구 , 30(2): 53-68.

11.

정준민. 2010. 인용문헌 분석을 통한 학술 논문의 수명 및 계보에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지 , 44(2): 357-379.

12.

정희경, 이춘실. 2009. 국내 의학 학술지의 일정 주기별 SCI 피인용 최상위 논문 선정 방법. 제16회 한국정보관리학회 학술대회 논문집 , 127-132.

13.

Adam, D. 2002. “Citation analysis: The counting house." Nature, 415: 726-729.

14.

Bi, H. H., Wang, J., & Lin, D. K. J. 2011. “Comprehensive citation index for researchnetworks." IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 23(x): to be published.

15.

Bollen, J., Van de Sompel, H. 2008. “Usage Impact Factor: The effects of sample characteristicson usage-based impact metrics." Journal of the American Society for InformationScience and Technology, 59(1): 1-14.

16.

Chen, P., Xie, H., Maslov, S., & Redner, S. 2007. “Finding scientific gems with Google'sPageRank algorithm." Journal of Informetrics, 1(1): 8-15.

17.

Dellavalle, R. P., Schilling, L. M., Rodriguez, M. A., Van de Sompel, H., & Bollen, J. 2007.“Refining dermatology journal impact factors using PageRank." Journal of the AmericanAcademy of Dermatology, 57(1): 116-119.

18.

Ding, Y., Yan, E., Frazho, A., & Caverlee, J. 2009. “PageRank for ranking authors in cocitationnetworks." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,60(11): 2229-2243.

19.

Egghe, L. 2009. “On the relation between Schubert's h-index of a single paper and its totalnumber of received citations." Scientometrics, 84(1): 115-117.

20.

Fragkiadaki, E., Evangelidis, G., Samaras, N., Dervos, D. A. 2011. “f-Value: Measuring anarticle's scientific impact." Scientometrics, 86(3): 671-686.

21.

Franceschini, F., Maisano, D. 2011. “Structured evaluation of the scientific output of academicresearch groups by recent h-based indicators." Journal of Informetrics, 5(1): 64-74.

22.

Glänzel, W., Moed, H. F. 2002. “Journal impact measures in bibliometric research." Scientometrics,53(2): 171-193.

23.

Hansen, D., Shneiderman, B., & Smith, M. A. 2010. Analyzing Social Media Networks withNodeXL: Insights from a Connected World. Morgan Kaufmann.

24.

Langville, A. N., & Meyer, C. D. 2006. Google's PageRank and Beyond: The Science ofSearch Engine Rankings. Princeton University Press.

25.

Moed, H. F. 2005. Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation. Springer.

26.

Newman, M. E. J. 2010. Networks: An Introduction. Oxford University Press.

27.

Neylon, C., & Wu, S. 2009. “Article-level metrics and the evolution of scientific impact."PLoS Biology, 7(11): e1000242. [online]. [cited 2011.4.1].<http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000242>.

28.

Page, L., Brin, S., Motwani, R., & Winograd, T. 1999. “The PageRank citation ranking:Bringing order to the Web." Technical Report. Stanford InfoLab. [online]. [cited 2011.4.1].<http://ilpubs.stanford.edu:8090/422/>.

29.

Price, D. J. de Solla. 1976. “A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantageprocesses." Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27(5): 292-306.

30.

Priem, J., & Hemminger, B. H. 2010. “Scientometrics 2.0: New metrics of scholarly impacton the social Web." First Monday, 15(7). [online]. [cited 2011.4.1].<http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2874/2570>.

31.

Seglen, P. O. 1993. “How representative is the journal impact factor?" Research Evaluation,2: 143-149.

32.

Seglen, P. O. 1997. “Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluatingresearch." British Medical Journal, 314: 498-502.

33.

Sidiropoulos, A., & Manolopoulos, Y. 2005. “A citation-based system to assist prize awarding."SIGMOD Records, 34(4): 54-60.

34.

Sidiropoulos, A., & Manolopoulos, Y. 2006. “Generalized comparison of graph-based rankingalgorithms for publications and authors." Journal of Systems and Software, 79(12): 1679-1700.

35.

Thor, A., Bornmann, L. 2011a. “The calculation of the single publication h index and relatedperformance measures: A web application based on Google Scholar data." Online InformationReview, 35(2): 291-300.

36.

Thor, A., & Bornmann, L. 2011b. Web Application to Calculate the Single Publication hIndex(and Further Metrics) based on Google Scholar. [online]. [cited 2011.4.1].<http://labs.dbs.uni-leipzig.de/gsh>.

37.

Walker, D., Xie, H., Yan, K.-K., & Maslov, S. 2007. “Ranking scientific publications usinga model of network traffic." Journal of Statistical Mechanics, P06010. [online]. [cited2011.4.1].<http://stacks.iop.org/JSTAT/2007/P06010>.

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science

e-Submission OA Policy