바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.45 No.4
Citation Share

도서관 경제성 평가 연구의 비평적 분석

A Critical Review of Research on the Economic Valuation of Libraries

한국문헌정보학회지 / Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2011, v.45 no.4, pp.27-52
https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2011.45.4.027
고영만 (성균관대학교)
심원식 (성균관대학교)
고영만, & 심원식. (2011). 도서관 경제성 평가 연구의 비평적 분석. 한국문헌정보학회지, 45(4), 27-52, https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2011.45.4.027
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수
PDF 다운로드

초록

도서관과 도서관 서비스의 가치는 전통적으로 긍정적으로 인식되어 왔다. 도서관 가치의 경제성 측정은 이러한 가치를 보다 구체화시키고 도서관의 다양한 이해관계자들이 공유할 수 있게 되었다는 점에서 유용하다. 본 연구는 도서관 경제성 측정과 관련된 다양한 이론 연구 및 측정 사례를 포괄적으로 정리, 분석함으로써 향후 이 분야 연구의 중요한 토대를 마련하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 국내 18건, 해외 71건 총 89건의 문헌을 추출하였고, 이를 정리, 비교, 분석하였다. 또한 도서관 가치의 계량화와 관련된 제반 문제들을 검토하고 기존에 수행된 도서관 경제성 평가 연구를 체계적으로 분석, 제시하였다. 도서관의 가치 측정과 관련된 연구는 1990년대 중반 공공도서관의 가치에 대한 이론적 탐색 작업으로부터 시작하였다. 2000년대 초반의 경제학적 가치측정 방법을 공공도서관에 적용하기 위한 이론적, 방법론적 검토를 거쳐 2000년대 중반 이후에는 검토된 방법론을 적용하여 실제로 그 가치를 측정하는 연구로 발전하였다. 도서관 경제성 평가와 관련된 제반 연구들을 분석하고 종합한 결과 방법론과 응용의 일관성이 부족하여 유사한 연구가 반복 검증되고 있으며, 평가결과의 비교와 연구결과의 적용 능력을 제한하고 있는 것으로 나타나고 있다.

keywords
도서관 가치 평가, 도서관 경제성, 경제성 평가, 공공도서관, 대학도서관, Library Valuation, Economic Value of Library, Economic Valuation, Public Library, Academic Library

Abstract

The value of the library has always been recognized positively. Economic valuation of libraries and their services uses a concrete methodology that enables the quantification of library value and communication of said value among library stakeholders. This paper presents a comprehensive review of literature on economic valuation of the library based on a total of 89 studies conducted over the last quarter-century. Research on library valuation began in the mid-1990's with the formal exploration of the value of public libraries from a theoretical point of view. In the 2000's, various theories and methodologies were reviewed and put into actual measurement studies. The comprehensive review and analysis point to the need for the development of consistent and reliable set of methods, which will facilitate further application of methods and comparison of results.

keywords
도서관 가치 평가, 도서관 경제성, 경제성 평가, 공공도서관, 대학도서관, Library Valuation, Economic Value of Library, Economic Valuation, Public Library, Academic Library

참고문헌

1.

고영만. 2003. 정보의 경제성에 대한 담론. 한국문헌정보학회지 , 37(4): 53-68.

2.

곽영진. 1993. 연구노트: DEA를 이용한 대학도서관의 효율성 추세분석. 경영논집 , 9(1): 509-533.

3.

김동석, 조동호, 고영만. 2003.디지털도서관의 경제성 평가: 국립디지털도서관 DLP 사례연구. 정보관리학회지 , 20(4): 161-195.

4.

김선애. 2004. DEA를 이용한 대학도서관의 효율성 평가-프랑스의 대학도서관을 대상으로. 한국문헌정보학회 학술발표논집. 17: 7-32.

5.

김선애. 2010. 우리나라의 도서관평가 현황 및 향후 추진방향. 국회도서관보 , 381: 2-7.

6.

류희경. 2006. 국내단행본 원문정보서비스의 경제적 가치 측정에 관한 연구 . 박사학위논문, 중앙대학교 대학원.

7.

정동열, 조찬식. 2006. 기술정보서비스의 경제성 평가 및 측정에 관한 이론적 고찰. 정보관리학회지 , 23(1): 41-62.

8.

정혜경. 2004. 디지털 아카이빙의 경제성 분석 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지 , 38(4): 251-270.

9.

정혜경, 정은주. 2007. 공공도서관의 가치평가를 위한 가상가치평가법 분석. 정보관리학회지 ,24(1): 187-208

10.

정혜경, 고영만, 심원식, 표순희. 2009. 도서관의 경제적 가치측정 연구의 탐색적 메타분석. 한국문헌정보학회지 , 43(4): 117-137.

11.

차미경. 2003. 공공도서관의 지역사회에 대한 영향력 평가 지표 개발에 관한연구. 한국문헌정보학회지 , 37(4): 311-328.

12.

표순희. 2006. 공공도서관 경제적 가치 측정에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지 , 40(2): 243-261.

13.

표순희, 고영만, 심원식. 2011. 공공도서관 이용가치에 영향을 미치는 요인. 한국도서관․정보학회지 , 42(2): 323-341.

14.

표순희, 정동열. 2008. 공공도서관 경제적 이용가치 측정방안에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지 ,42(2): 219-234.

15.

한국개발연구원. 2001. 국립디지털도서관 건립사업 예비타당성 조사연구 . 서울: 한국개발연구원.

16.

한국개발연구원. 2005. 헌법재판소 도서관 신축사업 타당성 재검증 보고서 . 서울: 한국개발연구원.

17.

한국개발연구원. 2008. 행정도시 종합도서관 건립사업 예비타당성 조사 . 서울: 한국개발연구원.

18.

과학기술정책연구원. 2007. 기초학문자료센터 구축사업의 정책적 경제적 효과 분석 . 서울: 과학기술정책연구원.

19.

Aabø, S., & Strand, J. 2004. “Public library valuation, nonuse values, and altruistic motivations.”Library & Information Science Research, 26: 351-372.

20.

Aabø, S. 2005. “Are public libraries worth their price?" New Library World, 106(11/12):487-95.

21.

Aabø, S. 2009. “Libraries and Return on Investment(ROI): A meta-analysis." New LibraryWorld, 110(7/8): 311-324.

22.

Aabø, S., & Audunson, R. 2002. “Rational choice and valuation of public libraries: Caneconomic models for evaluating non-market goods be applied to public libraries?" Journalof Library and Information Science, 34(1): 5-16.

23.

Aabø, S., & Strand, J. 2004. “Public library valuations, nonuse values, and altruistic motivations."Library and Informations Science Research, 26(3): 351-372.

24.

Abels, E. G. 1997. “Improving reference service cost studies.” Library and InformationScience Research, 19(2): 135-152.

25.

Abend, J., & McClure, C. R. 1999. “Recent views on identifying impacts from publiclibraries." Public Library Quarterly, 17(3): 3-29.

26.

Americans for Libraries Council. 2006. Worth Their Weight: An Assessment of the EvolvingField of Library Valuation. [online]. [cited 2011.7.18].<http://www.ila.org/advocacy/pdf/WorthTheirWeight.pdf>.

27.

Arrow, K., Solow, R., Portney, P., Leamer, E., Radner, R., & Schuman, H. 1993. “Reportof the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Panel on contingent valuation."Federal Register, 58(10): 4016-4614.

28.

Barron, D. D., Williams, R. V., Bajjaly, S., Arns, J., & Wilson, S. 2005. The Economic Impactof Public Libraries on South Carolina. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina, TheSchool of Library and Information Science. [online]. [cited 2011.7.20].<http://www.libsci.sc.edu/SCEIS/home.htm>.

29.

Beheshit, J. 2002. The Use of NLC MARC Records in Canadian Libraries, Phase I:University and Large Urban Public Libraries, Final Report, 31 March 2002. Montreal,Canada: McGill University, Graduate School of Library and Information Studies.

30.

Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council and MLA North West. 2005. Bolton’s Museum, Libraryand Archive Services: An Economic Evaluation. Bolton, England: Metropolitan BoroughCouncil.

31.

Boyle, K. J., Poe, G. L., & Bergstrom, J. C. 1994. “What do we know about groundwatervalues? Preliminary implications from a meta analysis of contingent-valuation studies."American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 76(5): 1055- 1061.

32.

Braunstein, Y. M. 1979. “Costs and benefits of library information: The user point of view."Library Trends, 28: 79-87.

33.

British Library. 2003. British Library Economic Impact Assessment: Final Report.[Confidential Report].

34.

Carnegie Mellon Center for Economic Development. 2006. Carnegie Library of PittsburghCommunity Impact and Benefits. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University. [online].[cited 2011.7.26].<http://www.clpgh.org/about/economicimpact/CLPCommunityImpactFinalReport.pdf>.

35.

Carson, R. T., Wright, J. Carson, N., Alberini, A., & Flores, N. 1994. A Bibliography ofContingent Valuation Studies and Papers. La Jolla, CA: Natural Resource Damage Assessment.

36.

Chambers, C. M., Chambers, P. E., & Whitehead, J. C. 1998. “Contingent valuation ofquasi-public goods: Validity, reliability, and application to valuing a historic site." PublicFinance Review, 26(2): 137-154.

37.

Debono, B. 2002. “Assessing the social impact of public libraries: What the literature issaying." Aplis, 15(2): 80-95.

38.

Elliottt, D. S., Holt, G. E., Hayden, S. W., & Edmonds, L. 2007. Measuring Your Library'sValue. Chicago, IL: American Library Association.

39.

Gremler, D. D. 2004. “The critical incident technique in service research" Journal of ServiceResearch, 7(1): 65-89.

40.

Griffiths, J. M., King, D., & Lynch, T. 2004. Taxpayer Return on Investment in FloridaPublic Libraries: Summary Report. Tallahassee, FL: State Library and Archives of Florida,September 2004. [online]. [cited 2011.7.19].<http://dlis.dos.state.fl.us/bld/roi/pdfs/ROISummaryreport.pdf>.

41.

Gorman, M. 2000. Our Enduring Values: Librarianship in the 21st Century. Chicago, IL:American Library Association.

42.

Grover, V., Jeong, S. R., & Segars, A. H. 1996. “Information systems effectiveness: Theconstruct space and patterns of application." Information & Management, 31: 177-191.

43.

Harless, D. W., & Allen, F. R. 1999. “Using the contingent valuation method to measurepatron benefits of reference desk service in an academic library." College and ResearchLibraries, 60(1): 56-69.

44.

Hider, P. 2008. “Using the contingent valuation method for dollar valuations of libraryservices." Library Quarterly, 78(4): 437-458.

45.

Holt, G. E., Elliott, D., & Dussold, C. 1996. “A framework for evaluating public investmentin urban libraries." The Bottom Line, 9(4): 4-13.

46.

Holt, G. E., Elliott, D., & Moore, A. 1999. “Placing a value on public library services." PublicLibraries, 38(2): 98-108.

47.

Holt, G. E., & Elliott, D. 2000. Public Library Benefits Valuation Study. Final report tothe Institute of Museum and Library Services for National Leadership. St. Louis, MO: St.Louis Public Library. [online]. [cited 2011.7.22].<http://www.slpl.lib.mo.us/libsrc/valuation.htm>.

48.

Holt, G. E., Elliott, D. S., Holt, L. E., & Watts, A. 2001. Public Library Benefits ValuationStudy. [online]. [cited 2011.7.29]. <http://www.slpl.lib.mo.us/libsrc/valuation.htm>.

49.

Holt, G. E., & D. Elliott. 2003. “Measuring outcomes: Applying cost-benefit analysis tomiddle-sized and smaller public libraries." Library Trends, 51(3): 424-440.

50.

Imholz, S., & Arns, J. W. 2007. Worth Their Weight: An Assessment of the EvolvingField of Library Valuation. New York: Americans for Libraries Council.

51.

Jackson, M. E. 1997. Access & Technology Program/ILL/DD Performance Measures Study.Washington, D.C.: Association of Research Libraries. [online]. [cited 2011.7.27].<http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/illdds.pdf>.

52.

Jura Consultants. 2005. Bolton's Museum, Library and Archive Services: An EconomicValuation. Edinburg: Jura Consultant.

53.

Kantor, P. B. 1986. “Three studies of the economics of academic libraries." Quoted in G.B.McCabe & B. Kreissman eds., Advances in Library Administration and Organization,221-286. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

54.

Kantor, P. B. 1989. “Library cost analysis." Library Trends, 38(2): 171-188.

55.

Kantor, P. B., Saracevic, T., & D'Esposito-Wachtmann, J. 1995. Studying the Cost andValue of Library Services. Final Report. New Brunswick, NJ: School of Communication,Information and Library Studies, Rutgers University. Technical report APLAB/94-3.

56.

Kim, G. 2011. “A critical review of valuation studies to identify frameworks in libraryservices.” Library & Information Science Research, 33: 112-119.

57.

Kingma, B. R. 1996. The Economics of Access versus Ownership to Scholarly Information.Binghamton, New York: Haworth Press, Inc.

58.

Kingma, B. R. 2001. The Economics of Information. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.

59.

Kuhlen, R. 1995. Informationsmarkt: Chancen und Risiken der Kommerzialisierung vonWissen. Konstanz: UVK.

60.

Martin-Fernandez, J., et al. 2010. “Differences between willingness to pay and willingnessto accept for visits by a family physician: A contingent valuation study." BMC Public Health, 10: 236. [online]. [cited 2011.8.9].<http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/10/236>.

61.

McClure, C. R., Fraser, B. T., Nelson, T. W., & Robbins, J. B. 2000. Economic Benefitsand Impacts from Public Libraries in the State of Florida. Tallahassee, FL: InformationUse Management and Policy Institute, School of Information Studies.

62.

McDermott Miller Ltd. 2002. National Bibliographic Database and National Union Catalogue:Economic Valuation. [online]. [cited 2011.7.22].<http://www.natlib.govt.nz/catalogues/library-documents/economic-valuation-nbd-nuc>.

63.

Missingham, R. 2005. “Libraries and economic values: A review of recent studies." PerformanceMeasurement and Metrics, 6(3): 142−158.

64.

Morris, A., Hawkins, M., & Sumsion, J. 2000. The Economic Value of Public Libraries.London: The Council for Museums, Archives and Libraries.

65.

Noonan, D. S. 2002. Contingent Valuation Studies in the Arts and Culture: An AnnotatedBibliography. Working Paper Series 0304. Chicago, IL: Harris School of Public PolicyStudies, University of Chicago. [online]. [cited 2011.8.10].<http://ideas.repec.org/p/har/wpaper/0304.html>.

66.

Poll, R. 2003. “Measuring impact and outcome of libraries." Performance Measurement andMetrics, 4(1): 5-12.

67.

Pung, C., Clarke, A., & Pattern, L. 2004. “Measuring the economic impact of the BritishLibrary." New Review of Academic Librarianship, 10(1): 79-102.

68.

Repo, A. J. 1986. “The dual approach to the value of information: An appraisal of use andexchange values." Information Processing & Management, 22(5): 373-383.

69.

Saracevic, T., & Kantor, P. B. 1997. “Studying the value of library and information services.Part II. Methodology and Taxonomy." Journal of the American Society for InformationScience, 48(6): 543-563.

70.

Shim, W. 1999. A Novel Approach to the Evaluation of Research Libraries in the U.S.Doctoal Dissertation. New Brunswick, NJ: School of Rutgers, the State University of NewJersey.

71.

Steffen, N., Lietzau, Z., Lance, K. C., Rybin, A., & Molliconi, C. 2009. Public Libraries -A Wise Investment: A Return on Investment Study of Colorado Libraries. Denver, CO:Colorado State Library, Library Research Service.

72.

Sumsion, J., Hawkins, M., & Morris, A. 2003. “Estimating the economic value of librarybenefits." Performance Measurement and Metrics, 4(1): 13-27

73.

Taylor, R. S. 1986. Value-Added Processes in Information Systems. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

74.

Trezzini, B. 2006. “From efficiency to effectiveness: Challenges in assessing the socioeconomicimpact of public libraries in Singapore." Singapore Journal of Library & Information Management,34: 41-59.

75.

Town, S. 2008. “Building a resource for practical assessment adding value to value andimpact.” Presentation made at the Library Assessment Conference. 6th August, Seattle,WA. [online]. [cited 2011.7.27]. <http://libraryassessment.org/bm~doc/town.pps>.

76.

Wilkinson, J. B. 1980. “Economics of information: Criteria for counting the cost and benefit.”ASLIB Proceedings, 32(1): 1-9.

77.

Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., & Parasuraman, A. 1988. “Communication and controlprocesses in the delivery of service quality." Journal of Marketing, 52(4): 35-48.

한국문헌정보학회지

논문 투고 OA 정책