-검정.jpg){kind=logo}
- 권한신청
- P-ISSN1225-598X
- E-ISSN2982-6292
차세대 도서관 목록의 제반 기능에 관한 분석- SearchWorks를 중심으로 -
An Analysis on the Functions of the Next Generation Library Catalog: With a Focus on SearchWorks
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
초록
이 연구의 목적은 Stanford University 도서관의 차세대 도서관 목록인 SearchWorks 기능의 특성과 변화를 살펴보는 것이다. SearchWorks는 오픈 소스 검색 인터페이스 Blacklight를 사용하여 이용자 요구와 검색행태를 적극 반영하도록 개발된 목록이다. SearchWorks의 주요 기능은 일반적인 상용 차세대 도서관 목록들의 표준 기능과 다르지 않으며, 2010년 베타 버전 소개 이후 보다 유용한 기능의 추가와 확대, 불필요한 기능 제거 등 이용자 분석에 기반한 지속적 개선과 변화가 관찰되었다.
- keywords
- 차세대 도서관 목록, 검색 인터페이스, 오픈 소스 소프트웨어, 블랙라이트, Next Generation Library Catalog, Discovery Interface, Open Source Software, Blacklight
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine the functions and features of SearchWorks developed as the Next Generation Library Catalog by Stanford University Libraries. It was designed to fully represent the needs and search behaviors of users, with Blacklight, an open source software. Its main features are not different from those standard functions supplied by other commercial packages of Next Generation Library Catalogs, and its continuing improvement and changes, including the addition and expansion of more useful functions and the removal of unnecessary ones, have been observed since the introduction of a beta version in 2010.
- keywords
- 차세대 도서관 목록, 검색 인터페이스, 오픈 소스 소프트웨어, 블랙라이트, Next Generation Library Catalog, Discovery Interface, Open Source Software, Blacklight
참고문헌
구중억, 곽승진. 2007. 차세대 OPAC의 인터페이스와 기능에 관한 연구. ..한국비블리아학회지.., 18(2): 61-88.
김예린, 정영미. 2011. 대학도서관의 차세대 OPAC 체크리스트 개발. ..한국정보관리학회 2011년도제18회 학술대회 논문집.., 53-58.
노동조, 민숙희. 2011. 대학도서관 웹사이트 분석을 통한 도서관 2.0 기반 서비스 운영실태 분석. ..정보관리연구.., 42(4): 195-223.
심 경. 2008a. 차세대 도서관 목록. ..도서관문화.., 49(9): 22-28.
심 경. 2008b. 차세대 도서관 목록의 사례: AquaBrowser. ..도서관문화.., 49(10): 48-56.
심 경. 2008c. 차세대 도서관 목록의 사례 (2): WorldCat Local. ..도서관문화.., 49(11): 54-61.
심 경. 2009. 오픈 소스 도서관 자동화 시스템. ..도서관문화.., 50(1): 35-42.
유영준. 2011. 차세대 도서관 목록에서의 패싯 내비게이션에 관한 연구. ..정보관리학회지.., 28(3): 13-30.
윤정옥. 2012a. 도서관 목록의 지식 확산 도구 역할에 관한 시론: WorldCat을 중심으로. ..한국도서관.정보학회지.., 43(1): 123-141.
윤정옥. 2012b. 차세대 도서관 목록의 이용자 서평 기능에 관한 연구. ..한국문헌정보학회지.., 46(2): 115-132.
윤정옥. 2010. 차세대 도서관 목록 사례의 고찰. ..한국도서관.정보학회지.., 41(1): 1-28.
이현실. 2009. OPAC 접근 향상을 위한 도서관 툴바의 제공 및 사서 평가 연구. ..한국도서관.정보학회지.., 40(3): 157-180.
Apache Software Foundation. 2013. “Apache Solr.” [online]. [cited 2013.6.14]. <http://lucene.apache.org/solr/>.
Breeding, Marshall. 2012a. “A Directory of Libraries Throughout the World.” Library Technology Guides. [online]. [cited 2012.12.15]. <http://www.librarytechnology.org/>.
Breeding, Marshall. 2012b. “Association of Research Libraries: Discovery Systems.” Library Technology Guides. [online]. [cited 2012.10.26]. <http://www.librarytechnology.org/arl-discovery.pl>.
Breeding, Marshall. 2010. “State of the Art in Library Discovery 2010.” Computers in Libraries, 31(1): 31-35.
Breeding, Marshall. 2007a. “Next-Generation Catalogs.” Library Technology Reports, 43(4): 1-44.
Breeding, Marshall. 2007b. “Small World: OCLC Launches WorldCat Local.” Small Libraries Newsletter, 27(6): 3.
Breeding, Marshall. 2007c. “Thinking About Your Next OPAC.” Computers in Libraries, 27(4): 28-31.
Breeding, Marshall. 2004. “Integrated Library Software: A Guide to Multiuser, Multifunction Systems.” Library Technology Reports, 40(1): 1-44.
Connaway, Lynn Silipigni, Dickey, Timothy J., & Radford, Marie L. 2011. “‘If It Is Too Inconvenient, I’m Not Going After It’: Convenience as a Critical Factor in Information-Seeking Behaviors.” Library and Information Science Research, 33: 179-190.
Dempsey, Lorcan. 2012. “Thirteen Ways of Looking at Libraries, Discovery, and the Catalog: Scale, Workflow, Attention.” [online]. [cited 2013.6.15]. <http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/thirteen-ways-looking-libraries-discovery-and-catal og-scale-workflow-attention>.
Dempsey, Lorcan. 2006. “The Library Catalogue in the New Discovery Environment: Some Thoughts.” Ariadne. Issue 48. [online]. [cited 2013.6.15]. <http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue48/dempsey>.
Ken, Varnum. 2007. “ASIS&T 2007: Next-Generation Catalog: Prototypes and Prospects.” [online]. [cited 2009.12.26]. <http://www.rss4lib.com/2007/10/asist_2007_nextgeneration_cata.html>.
GitHub.Com. 2013. “Stanford-solr-marc/stanford-sw/sw_index.properties.” [online]. [cited 2013.6.14]. <https://github.com/solrmarc/stanford-solr-marc/blob/master/stanford-sw/sw_index.prop erties>.
Hearst, Marti A. 2009. Search User Interfaces. Boston, Mass.: Cambridge University Press. [online]. [cited 2013.8.2]. <http://searchuserinterfaces.com/book/>.
IFLA Task Force on Guidelines for OPAC Displays. 2003. Guidelines for Online Public Access Catalogue (OPAC) Displays (Draft). Unpublished Document.
Lindstrom, Henrik, & Malmsten, Martin. 2007. “User-Centred Design and Agile Development: Rebuilding the Swedish National Union Catalog.” Code{4}Lib Journal, 1. [online]. [cited 2009.12.31]. <http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/>.
Murray, Peter. 2008. “Discovery Tools and OPAC.” Power Point Presentation at NISO Forum on Next Generation Discovery Tools: New Tools, Aging Standards. [online]. [cited 2013.1.6]. <http://dltj.org/article/discovery-layer-video-tout/>.
OCLC. 2009. Online Catalogs: What Users and Librarians Want: An OCLC Report. [online]. [cited 2009.12.10]. <http://www.oclc.org/reports/onlinecatalogs/fullreport.pdf>.
Sierra, Tito, Joseph Ryan, & Markus Wust. 2007. Beyond OPAC 2.0: Library Catalog as Versatile Discovery Platform. Code{4}Lib Journal, 1. [online]. [cited 2009.12.31]. <http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/24>.
Singer, Ross. 2007. “Communicat: The Next Generation Catalog That Almost Was...” Code{4}Lib Journal, 1. [online]. [cited 2009.12.31]. <http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/>.
Stanford University. Libraries. 2013a. “SearchWorks.” [online]. [cited 2013.6.15]. <http://lib.stanford.edu/searchworks/what-searchworks-0>.
Stanford University. Libraries. 2013b. “SearchWorks.” “SearchWorks Help. Technical Glossary.” [online]. [cited 2013.6.14]. <http://lib.stanford.edu/searchworks/technical-glossary-0>.
Stanford University. Libraries. 2013c. “SearchWorks.” “SearchWorksHelp. What MARC fields are searched in the different searches?” [online]. [cited 2013.6.15]. <http://lib.stanford.edu/searchworks/index-and-facet-field-mapping>.
Stanford University. Libraries. 2013d. “Stopwords in SearchWorks - to be or not to be.” [online]. [cited 2013.6.14]. <http://library.stanford.edu/blogs/digital-library-blog/2011/12/stopwords-searchworks-beor- not-be>.
Stanford University. Libraries. 2009. “Socrates.” [online]. [cited 2009.12.3]. <http://socrates.stanford.edu>.
Stanford University. SULAIR. 2009. “Did You Know Why the Catalog is Called Socrates?” [online]. [cited 2009.12.11]. <http://library.stanford.edu/guides/dyk_socrates.html>.
University of Chicago. Library. 2012. [online]. [cited 2012.10.26]. <http://lens.lib.uchicago.edu/>.
Wisniewski, Jeff. 2008. “Implementing a Next Gen OPAC.” [online]. [cited 2013.6.15]. <http://www.slideshare.net/jeffwisniewski/next-generation-opac-presentation>.
Yang, Sharon Q., & Hofmann, Melissa A. 2011. “Next Generation or Current Generation?: A Study of the OPACs of 260 Academic Libraries in the USA and Canada.” Library Hi Tech, 29(2): 266-300.
Yang, Sharon Q., & Hofmann, Melissa A. 2010. “Evaluating and Comparing Discovery Tools: How Close Are We Towards Next Generation Catalog?” Library Hi Tech, 28(4): 690-709.
Ling-yee, L. (2007), “Marketing resources and performance of exhibitor firms in trade shows: A contingent resource perspective,” Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 36, pp. 360-370.
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
- 0KCI 피인용수
- 0WOS 피인용수