바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

도서관의 디지털화 수준 평가항목 개발에 관한 연구

A Study on Developing the Evaluation Items for Estimating the Digitization Level of Libraries

한국문헌정보학회지 / Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2016, v.50 no.2, pp.47-75
https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2016.50.2.047
노영희 (건국대학교)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

본 연구에서는 도서관의 디지털화 수준을 평가하기 위한 항목을 개발하고자 하였으며, 이를 위해 디지털도서관 관련 문헌을 분석하고, 전문가 자문 및 의견수렴과정을 거쳐, 최종적으로 13가지 차원의 비교축을 도출하였다. 이는 수서, 장서(물리적․온라인컬렉션), 분류목록, 대출반납, 참고서비스, 이용자서비스, 도서관프로그램서비스, 공간서비스, SNS서비스, 도서관의 조직 및 직원, 장비제공서비스, 차세대서비스, ‘우리 도서관의 디지털화 수준의 디지털화 수준’ 등이다. 1차적으로 도출된 디지털화수준 평가항목에 대해 현장사서들의 검증과정을 거치기 위해 설문조사를 수행했으며, 전체적으로 보았을 때 전통적 평가항목의 적절성에 대한 평균은 3.82이고 디지털 평가항목의 적절성에 대한 평균은 4.08로 나타났다. 따라서 도서관의 디지털화 수준을 평가하기 위해 본 연구에서 제안한 평가 항목들은 상당히 적절하다고 할 수 있다.

keywords
도서관, 디지털화 수준, 전통적 특성, 디지털적 특성, 평가항목, Library, Digitization Level, Conventional Characteristics, Digital Characteristics, Evaluation Items

Abstract

This study was conducted to develop items for evaluating the level of the digitization of libraries. For this purpose, it analyzed the literature related to the digital library, underwent a convergence process of 10 experts, and finally derived an axis of 13 different dimensions comparing the digitization of libraries. The axis is composed of acquisitions, collections (physical and online collections), classification and cataloging, circulation service, reference, user service, SNS service, the library’s organization and staff, device providing service, next-generation service, and status of our library. This study conducted a survey of librarians to secure the validation of the primarily derived evaluation items regarding libraries’ digitization. As a result, the average rating of the traditional evaluation items was 3.82, and the average rating of the digital evaluation items was 4.08. Therefore, it can be said that the results of this research to evaluate the digitized level of libraries have a certain degree of validity.

keywords
도서관, 디지털화 수준, 전통적 특성, 디지털적 특성, 평가항목, Library, Digitization Level, Conventional Characteristics, Digital Characteristics, Evaluation Items

참고문헌

1.

곽동철, 노영희. 2013. 학술정보의 탐색 및 활용. 서울: 조은글터.

2.

김정근. 1997. 디지털 도서관 꿈인가 광기인가 현실인가. 서울: 민음사.

3.

남태우. 2011. 한국 도서관계에서 디지털의 의미: 디지털도서관의 현상과 인식. 2011년도 한국도서관․정보학회 동계학술발표대회, 2011년 12월 1일, 부산: 부산대학교: 9-36.

4.

노영희. 2014. 차세대디지털도서관의 발전방향논의에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 31(2), 7-40.

5.

윤희윤. 1997. 도서관의 미래상에 대한 담론 및 쟁점의 분석과 형상화. 도서관학논집, 27, 61-95.

6.

이병목. 2003. 우리들의 도서관: 오늘과 내일. 도서관문화, 44(4), 25-41.

7.

ACE, Arts Council England. 2013. Envisioning the Library of the Future. [online]<http://www.artscouncil.org.uk/media/uploads/pdf/The_library_of_the_future_May_2013.pdf>

8.

ALA. 2011. Confronting the Future: Strategic Visions for the 21st Century Public Library. [online]<http://www.ala.org/ala/aboutala/offices/oitp/publications/policybriefs/confronting_the_futu.pdf>

9.

ALA. 2013a. 2013 Cutting-Edge Technology in Library Services Case Studies. [online]<http://www.ala.org/offices/sites/ala.org.offices/files/content/oitp/cuttingedge/2013_cutting_edge.pdf>

10.

ALA. 2013b. The ALA Honors Five Local Libraries for Offering Cutting-Edge Services. [online] <http://www.districtdispatch.org/2013/01/cutting-edge-2013/>

11.

Bawden, D. and Rowlands, I. 1999a. “Digital Libraries: Assumptions and Concepts.” Libri, 49(4), 181-191.

12.

Bawden, D. and Rowlands, I. 1999b. Understanding Digital Libraries: Towards a Conceptual Framework. London: British Library Research & Innovation Centre.

13.

Bell, L. and Trueman, R. B. 2008. Virtual Worlds, Real Libraries: Librarians and Educators in Second Life and Other Multi-User Virtual Environments. Medford, NJ: Information Today.

14.

Breeding, M. 2011. “Preparing for the Long-Term Digital Future of Libraries.” Computers in Libraries, 31(1), 24-26.

15.

Chow, A. et al. 2010. When Real and Virtual Worlds Collide: A Public Library’s Management of a Second Life Library. ALA Virtual Communities and Libraries Membership Interest Group online conference.

16.

Chow, A. and Croxton, R. 2012. “Information Seeking Behavior and Reference Medium Preferences: Differences among Faculty, Staff, and Students.” Reference and User Services Quarterly, 51(3), 246-262.

17.

Crane, G. et al. 2006. “Beyond Digital Incunabula: Modeling the Next Generation of Digital Libraries.” Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries, 4172, 353-366.

18.

Hendrix, J. C. 2010. Checking Out the Future: Perspectives from the Library Community on Information Technology and 21st Century Libraries. Washington, DC: American Library Association.

19.

IMLS. 2012. Building Digital Communities: A Framework for Action. [online]<https://www.imls.gov/assets/1/AssetManager/BuildingDigitalCommunities_Framework.pdf>

20.

Jochumsen, H., Rasmussen, C. H. and Skot-Hansen, D. 2012. “The Four Spaces: A New Model for the Public Library.” New Library World, 113(11/12), 586-597.

21.

Kroski, E. 2009. Net-Gen Libraries. [online]<http://www.slideshare.net/ellyssa/nextgen-libraries>

22.

Liew C. L. 2009. “Digital library Research 1997-2007: Organizational and People Issues.”Journal of Documentation, 65(2), 245-266.

23.

McGettigan, L. 2013. “Unafraid of the Future-Edinburgh´s Next Generation Library and information Services.” In Proceedings of IFLA WLIC 2013, August 18th, 2013, Singapore:1-12.

24.

Mukaiyama, H. 1997. “Technical Aspect of Next Generation Digital Library Project.” In Proceedings of the 3rd ISDL, November 18th-21st, 1997, Ibaraki: 72-79. [online]<http://www.dl.slis.tsukuba.ac.jp/ISDL97/proceedings/hiro/hiro.html>

25.

Noh, Y. 2015. “Imagining Library 4.0: Creating a Model for Future Libraries.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(6), 786-797.

26.

Piper, P. 2014. “The Library's Future Is Digital.” Online Searcher, 37(2), 22-26.

27.

Singh, T. and Sharma, A. 2015. “Research Work and Changing Dimensions of Digital Library:A Review.” In Proceedings of the Emerging Trends and Technologies in Libraries and Information Services (ETTLIS), 2015 4th International Symposium, January 6-8th, 2015, Noida: 39-42.

한국문헌정보학회지