바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.50 No.1
Citation Share

대학도서관 사서가 인식한 근거기반실무 지식의 영향 요인

Perceived Knowledge of Evidence-Based Practice among University Librarians

한국도서관·정보학회지 / Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, (P)2466-2542;
2019, v.50 no.1, pp.43-60
https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.50.1.201903.43
김갑선 (중원대학교)
김갑선. (2019). 대학도서관 사서가 인식한 근거기반실무 지식의 영향 요인. 한국도서관·정보학회지, 50(1), 43-60, https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.50.1.201903.43
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수
PDF 다운로드

초록

본 연구의 목적은 대학도서관 사서가 인식한 근거기반실무의 지식 정도와 영향 요인을 파악하여 대학도서관의 경영과 사서직 발전에 기초자료를 제공하는데 있다. 본 연구에 응답한 대학도서관 사서의 근거기반실무 지식에서 유의한 차이가 나타난 변인은 연령, 교육정도, 고용유형, 직위, 학술지읽기, 학술대회 참여이었다. 이들의 근거기반실무 지식에 영향을 미치는 예측 요인은 교육정도, 학술지읽기로 나타났다. 또한, 근거기반실무 지식 중 근거의 비판적 평가와 실무적용 및 연구문헌 이해와 연구수행은 취약한 것으로 밝혀졌다. 대학도서관 사서의 근거기반실무 지식은 대학도서관과 사서직의 지속적 발전을 위한 혁신의 촉진요인이라고 간주할 수 있기 때문에 근거기반실무의 지식역량을 향상시킬 수 있도록 사서 개인의 노력 뿐 아니라 연구 관련 활동을 지원하는 조직단위, 도서관계, 학계차원의 지원과 정책이 필요하다.

keywords
근거기반실무, 근거기반실무 지식, 대학도서관 사서, Evidence-based practice, University librarians

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify the levels and factors influencing perceived knowledge of evidence-based practice(K-EBP) among university librarians. The results were as follows. Variables with significant differences in K-EBP were age, education level, employed type, position, frequency of reading journal articles, and attendance of conference. Multiple regression analysis showed that the predicting factors influencing K-EBP were education level and frequency of reading journal articles. Also, It turned out to be weak in critically appraising and applying research evidence in practice, and in understanding research literature and conducting research among items of K-EBP. For developing university librarians' K-EBP, they need to improve overall research literacy. Library organization and library sectors need to support research activities of librarians. Finally, many different education programs are needed to develop librarians' research skill and to utilize for enlargement of evidence-based practice.

keywords
근거기반실무, 근거기반실무 지식, 대학도서관 사서, Evidence-based practice, University librarians

참고문헌

1.

김갑선. 2004. 대학도서관 사서의 연구활용 장애. 한국문헌정보학회지, 38(1): 77-91.

2.

김경윤, 이은주. 2016. 간호사의비판적사고성향, 간호과정수행능력과근거기반실무역량과의관계. 한국데이터정보과학회지, 27(2): 451–461.

3.

표순희.2009. 근거중심 문헌정보학실무의 내용과 방법론에 관한 연구. 한국정보관리학회지, 26(1): 351-370.

4.

표순희. 2010. 실무자의 근거출판 활성화를 통한 근거중심 문헌정보실무의 국내 적용 방안. 한국문헌정보학회지, 44(3): 219-239.

5.

김정숙, 구미옥, 조순연. 2013. 상급종합병원간호사의근거기반실무준비도에대한영향요인. 한국산학기술학회지, 14(6): 2945-2957.

6.

임경춘 외. 2011. 상급종합 병원간호사의 근거기반실무에 대한 지식과 태도 및 수행. 임상간호연구, 17(3): 375-387.

7.

손연정 외. 2012. 상급 종합병원 간호사의 정보검색능력이 근거기반실무 역량에 미치는 영향. 성인간호학회지, 24(6): 635-646.

8.

Bayley, L., S. Ferrell, & J. McKinnell. 2009. Practicing What We Preach: A Case Study “ on the Application of Evidence-Based Practice to Inform Decision Making for Public Services Staffing in an Academic Health Sciences Library.” New Review of Academic Librarianship, 15: 235–252.

9.

Booth, A. 2011. Barriers and Facilitators to Evidence-Based Library and Information “ Practice: An International Perspective.” Perspectives in International Librarianship, 2011:1. doi: 10.5339/pil.2011.1

10.

Booth, A. 2002. From EBM to EBL: Two Steps Forward or One Step Back?. “ ”Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 21(3): 51–64.

11.

Booth, A. 2007. Evidence in Real Time: The Story of an International Workshop. “ ” Health Information and Libraries Journal, 24(3): 227–231.

12.

Brettle, A. 2017, Gathering Evidence for Routine Decision-making. “ ”Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 12(4), 193-198.

13.

Brown, C. E et al. 2009. Nursing Practice, Knowledge, Attitudes and Perceived “ Barriers to Evidence-Based Practice at an Academic Medical Center.” Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65(2): 371-381.

14.

Crumley, E., & D. Koufogiannakis. 2002. Developing Evidence-Based Librarianship: “ Practical Steps for Implementation.” Health Information and Libraries Journal, 19(2): 61–70.

15.

Eldredge, J. D. 2000. Evidence-Based Librarianship: An Overview. “ ”Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 88: 289–302.

16.

Gillespie, A. M. 2014. Untangling the Evidence: Introducing an Empirical Model or “ Evidence-Based Library and Information Practice.” Information Research, 19(3). [on line] [cited 2017. 3. 15]. <http://www.informationr.net/ir/19-3/paper632.html#.XD3W-LAUmUk>

17.

Gillespie, A. M. et al. 2017. What do Australian Library and Information Professionals “ Experience as Evidence?.” Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 12(1): 97-108.

18.

Glynn, L. 2006. Editorial: The Current State of EBL. “ ”Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 1(2), 1–2.

19.

Hallam,G. 2018. Being Evidence Based Makes Sense! An Introduction to Evidence “ Based Library and Information Practice (EBLIP).” Forschung und Praxis, 2018, AR 3227. [on line] [cited 2018. 11. 7]. <https://edoc.hu-berlin.de/bitstream/handle/18452/20275/AR_3227_Hallam_ Preprint_BFP_2018.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y>

20.

Jamali, H. R. 2018. Use of Research by Librarians and Information Professionals. “ ” Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 1733. [on line] [cited 2018. 11. 7]. <https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1733>

21.

Koehen, M. L, & K. Lehmam. 2008. Nurses Perceptions of Evidence-Based Nursing “ ’ Practice.” Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(2): 209-215.

22.

Koufogiannakis, D. 2012. Academic Librarians' Conception and Use of Evidence “ Sources in Practice.” Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 7(4), 5-24.

23.

Koufogiannakis, D. 2013. EBLIP Keynote: What We Talk about When We talk about “ Evidence.” Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 8(4), 6–17.

24.

Koufogiannakis, D and Alison Brettle. 2016. Being Evidence Based in Library and Information Practice. London: Facet.

25.

Luo, Lili. 2018. Experiencing Evidence-Based Library and Information Practice (EBLIP): Academic Librarians' Perspective, College & Research Libraries, 79(4): 554-567.

26.

Miller, F. et al. 2017. How Academic Librarians Experience Evidence-Based Practice: “ A Grounded Theory Model.” Library and Information Science Research, 39(2): 124–130.

27.

Muellenbach, J. 2017. Australian Academic Librarians Experience of Evidence Based “ ’ Practice Involves Empowering, Intuiting, Affirming, Connecting, Noticing, and Impacting.” Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 12(4): 268-270.

28.

Todd, R. J. 2009. School Librarianship and Evidence Based Practice: Progress, “ Perspectives and Challenges.” Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 4(2): 78–96.

29.

Upton, Dominic and Penelope Upton. 2006. Development of an Evidence-Based “ Practice Questionnaire for Nurses.” Journal of Advanced Nursing, 53(4): 454– 458.

30.

Upton, Dominic, Penney Upton, and Laura Scurlock‐Evans. 2014. The Reach, “ Transferability, and Impact of the Evidence‐Based Practice Questionnaire: A Methodological and Narrative Literature Review.” Worldviews on Evidencvebased Nursing, 11(1): 46-54.

한국도서관·정보학회지

논문 투고 OA 정책