바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.42 No.4
Citation Share

An Analysis of the Foxonomy Constructed at Research Information Service and Future Perspectives

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science / Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2008, v.42 no.4, pp.95-112

(2008). An Analysis of the Foxonomy Constructed at Research Information Service and Future Perspectives. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 42(4), 95-112.
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

In contrast to traditional taxonomy, folksonomy is generated not only by experts but also by creators and consumers of the content. Folksonomy is the practice and method of collaboratively creating and managing tags to annotate and categorize content. It is also known as collaborative tagging or social indexing. Folksonomy is also used to link to create social network that connect people to people who share same interest. Folksonomy users can generally discover the contents by which the tag sets of another user who tends to interpret contents in a way that makes sense to them. Firstly, this study consider the significance and some critical issues about folksonomy. Secondly, analyze special features of Korean academic site's folksonomy, which is managed by academic information site. Accordingly consider the directions of development about folksonomy system.

keywords
Folksonomy, Taxonomy, Social Tag, OPAC, Research Information Service, 폭소노미, 텍소노미, 소셜 태그, OPAC. 학술정보서비스, Folksonomy, Taxonomy, Social Tag, OPAC, Research Information Service

Reference

1.

이재윤, (2008) 폭소노미 태그 사용 패턴 분석: 통제어휘 및 비통제어휘와의 비교, 제15회 한국정보관리학회 학술대회 논문집

2.

이정미, (2007) 폭소노미의 개념적 접근과 웹 정보 서비스에의 적용, 한국비블리아학회지

3.

조재인, (2008) 도서관 정보 수요자를 위한 소셜 네트워크 서비스 도입에 관한 연구, 한국도서관정보관리학회지

4.

마가린mar.gar.in, 소셜북마킹, 소셜태깅 그리고 마가린mar.gar.in,

5.

Arch, Xan, Creating the academic li- brary folksonomy: Put social tagging to work at your institution,

6.

Calhoun, Karen, Calhoun,Karen.2006.The Changing Nature of the Catalog and its Integration with Other Discovery Tools:Final Report,

7.

Chan, Sebastian, “Tagging and Searching ? Serendipity and museum collection databases." Museum & web 2007: Inter- national Conference for Curture & Her- itage Online, April, 2007 San Francisco,

8.

Golder, S. & Huberman, B, “Usage patterns of collaborative tagging ystems.” Journal of Information Science, no.32, vol.2 : 198-208. Quated in Edith. Speller. Collaborative ta,

9.

Marcum, Deanna B, "The Future of Cataloging."Ebsco Leadership Seminar,2005 Boston,

10.

Library Thing Zeitgeist,

11.

Noruzi, Alireza, “Folksonomies: Why do we need controlled vocabulary?” We- bology, 4(2),

12.

OCLC, Perception of Libraries and Information Resources,

13.

Peterson, Elaine, "Beneath the Metadata Some Philosophical Problems with Fol-ksonomy."D-Lib Magazine,12(11),

14.

Shirky, C, Ontology is Overrated: Cate- gories, Links, and Tags,

15.

SOPAC AADL,

16.

Speller, Edith, Collaborative tagging, folk- sonomies, distributed classification or ethnoclassification: a literature review,

17.

Spiteri, Louise F, Structure and form of folksonomy tags: The road to the public library catalogue,

18.

Thingology(LibraryThing's ideas blog), Tagmash: Book tagging grows up,

19.

Vander Wal, T, Folksonomy definition and Wikipedia,

20.

Weber, Jonathan, Folksonomy and Con- trolled Vocabulary in Library Thing,

21.

Tagging and Why It Matters,

22.

Weinberger, D, Weinberger,D.2006.Taxonomies and Tags:From Trees to Piles of Leaves,

23.

Quated in Edith. Speller. Collaborative tagging, folksonomies, distributed classification or ethnoclassification: a literature re- view: Library Student Journal,

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science

e-Submission OA Policy