바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Search Portals and Academic Libraries: An Analysis of the Book Services and Academic Information Services of Major Search Portals

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science / Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2009, v.43 no.3, pp.181-195
https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2009.43.3.181

  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

This study aims to perform an evaluation of the book services and academic information services provided by the major search portals of Korea and the United States. This study also investigates the relationships between search portals and academic libraries. The results of this study can be implemented for the development and improvement of the portals’ book and academic information services. Users can refer to the results of this study in choosing services from search portals. The results of this study can also provide implications for the differentiation of academic library services.

keywords
Search Portals, Book Service, Academic Information Service, Academic Libraries, 검색 포털, 책 서비스, 전문정보 서비스, 포털과 대학도서관 연계, Search Portals, Book Service, Academic Information Service, Academic Libraries

Reference

1.

배희진, 이진숙, 이준호, 박소연. 2004. 국내 웹 디렉토리들의 커버리지 및 커버리지 중복성 분석. ꡔ정보관리학회지ꡕ, 21(1): 173-186.

2.

송영희, 노진영, 권은경, 윤혜영. 2008. ꡔ디지털시대의 장서관리ꡕ. 서울: 한국도서관협회.

3.

윤희윤. 2006. ꡔ장서관리론ꡕ. 대구: 태일사.

4.

이지연, 박성재. 2005. 검색 포털 시스템의 동향과 발전방향. ꡔ정보관리연구ꡕ, 36(4): 71-89.

5.

이지연, 민지연, 주수형. 2007. 국가지식정보의 유통 현황 분석 및 유통방안에 관한 연구. ꡔ정보관리학회지ꡕ, 24(3): 299-320.

6.

조재인, 이지원. 2006. 검색포털과 대학도서관 소장목록 연계방안에 관한 연구. ꡔ정보관리연구ꡕ, 37(2): 75-92.

7.

한국도서관협회. 2008.ꡔ2008한국도서관연감ꡕ. [서울]: 한국도서관협회.

8.

Baksik, C. 2006. “Fair Use or Exploitation? The Google Book Search Controversy.” Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 6(4): 399-415.

9.

Hartman, K. A., & Mullen, L. B. 2008. “Google Scholar and academic libraries: an update.” New Library World, 109(5/6): 211-222.

10.

Henderson, J. 2005. “Google Scholar: A source for clinicians?." Canadian Medical Association Journal, 172(12): 1549-1550.

11.

Jasco, P. 2004. Google Scholar Beta. [online]. [cited 2009.7.26]. <http://www.gale.cengage.com/servlet/HTMLFileServlet?imprint=9999&region=7&fileName=/reference/archive/200412/googlescholar.html>.

12.

Jasco, P. 2005. Side-by-Side2: Native Search Engines vs. Google Scholar. [online]. [cited 2009.7.26]. <http://www2.hawaii.edu/~jacso/scholarly/side-by-side2.htm>.

13.

Johnson, P. 2004. Fundamentals of Collection Development & Management. Chicago: ALA.

14.

Meho, L. I., & Yang, K. 2007. “Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of Science versus Scopus and Google Scholar." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13): 2105-2125.

15.

Miller, W., & Pellen, R. M, eds. 2006. Libraries and Google. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Information Press.

16.

Newhaus, C., Newhaus, E., Asher, A., & Wrede, C. 2008. “The Depth and breadth of Google Scholar: An empirical study." Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 6(2): 127-141.

17.

Newhaus, C., Newhaus, E., & Asher, A. 2008. “Google Scholar goes to school: The presence of Google scholar on college and university web sites.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34(1): 39-51.

18.

Oder, N. 2005. “Google Scholar links with libraries." Library Journal, 130: 17-18.

19.

Robinson, M. L., & Wusterman, J. 2006. “Putting Google Scholar to the test: A preliminary study." Program: electronic library and information systems, 41(1): 71-80.

20.

Shroeder, R. 2007. “Pointing users toward citation searching: using Google Scholar and Web of Science." Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 7(2): 223-248.

21.

Vine, R. 2005. “Google Scholar." Journal of Medical Library Association, 94(1): 97-99.

22.

Walters, W. 2007. “Google Scholar coverage of multidisciplinary field.” Information Processing & Management, 43(4): 1121-1132.

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science