바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

A Study on the Subject-based Systematization of National Libraries in Korea

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science / Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2009, v.43 no.4, pp.5-27
https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2009.43.4.005

Abstract

The Library and Information Policy Committee announced a national comprehensive plan for all libraries in August, 2008. The plan includes the re-establishment of a subject-based national library system as one of the major policy challenges. Based on the preceding study (an analysis on systematization and the gaps in subject-based national libraries in major countries), this paper proposed three models: a centralized model focused on the NLK, a horizontally-linked model, and a long-term strategic model for subject-based national library systematization in Korea.

keywords
국가도서관, 국립도서관, 국립중앙도서관, 국가도서관 체계, 주제별 국가도서관, National Library, National Library of Korea, Systematization of National Libraries, Subject-based National Library

Reference

1.

國公立大學圖書館協議會. 2008. ꡔ國立大學圖書館報ꡕ, 26: 321.

2.

대통령 소속 도서관정보정책위원회. 2008. ꡔ도서관발전종합계획: 2009∼2013ꡕ. 서울: 동위원회.

3.

윤희윤. 2006. ꡔ학술연구정보서비스(RISS)가 연구성과에 미치는 기여도 평가 및 핵심지표 개발ꡕ. 서울: 한국교육학술정보원.

4.

윤희윤. 2007. 국내 공공도서관의 정책적 현안과 과제. ꡔ한국문헌정보학회지ꡕ, 41(2): 31-54.

5.

윤희윤. 2009. 주요 국가의 주제별 국가(급)도서관 체계 및 격차 분석. ꡔ한국도서관․정보학회지ꡕ, 40(3): 69-96.

6.

한국교육학술정보원. 2005. 국내외 연구중심대학의 도서관 현황과 KERIS의 주요 사업방향: 2005 년도 전국대학도서관대회. [cited 2009.5.5]. <www.riss4u.net/etc/fileDownLoad.jsp?file_name=03_2005_library.pdf>.

7.

한국교육학술정보원. 2006. ꡔ해외 학술정보 수요 및 이용행태조사를 위한 설문분석 결과ꡕ. 서울: 한국교육학술정보원.

8.

e-나라지표. 2009. “출판현황” [online]. [cited 2009.5.15]. <http://www.index.go.kr/egams/stts/jsp/potal/stts/PO_STTS_IdxMain.jsp?idx_cd=1648>.

9.

Akie, Ronald & Joel Baron. 2004. “The Demand Side of STM Publishing : Understanding Value Creation in New Market Units.” Learned Publishing, 17(3): 211-217.

10.

CISTI. 2007. CISTI Strategic Plan 2005-2010 : Exploiting Information for Innovation. Ottawa: Minister of Industry.

11.

European Union. 2008. Statistical Portrait of the European Union 2008. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

12.

Forfás. 2005. Survey of Research and Development in the Higher Education Sector 2004. Dublin: Forfás.

13.

Hook, Peter A., Katy Börner, and Kevin Boyack. 2005. “Mapping the Disciplinary Diffusion of Information.” [online]. [cited 2009.4.18]. <http://www.ccsr.uiuc.edu/UCS2005/audiosections/PPTwithoutMP3/HookPeter.ppt>.

14.

Houghton, John. 2000. Economics of Scholarly Communication : A Discussion Paper. Canberra: Center for Strategic Economic Studies Victoria University.

15.

Houghton, John W., Colin Steele, and Margaret Henty. 2003. Changing Research Practices in the Digital Information and Communication Environment. Canberra: Department of Education.

16.

Japan Book Publishers Association. “An Introduction to Publishing in Japan 2006-2007.”[online]. [cited 2009.6.10]. <http://www.jbpa.or.jp/en/pdf/pdf01.pdf>.

17.

Japanese Economy Division. 2005. “Japanese Publishing Industry.” JETRO Japan Economic Monthly, [online]. [cited 2009.5.15]. <http://www.jetro.go.jp/en/reports/market/pdf/2005_42_r.pdf>.

18.

Leydesdorff, Loet & Ismael Rafols. 2007. “A Global Map of Science Based on the ISI Subject Categories.” [online]. [cited 2009.6.20]. <http://users.fmg.uva.nl/lleydesdorff/map06/texts/map06.pdf>.

19.

Moya-Anegón, Félix et al. 2004. “A New Technique for Building Maps of Large Scientific Domains Based on the Co-citation of Classes and Categories.” Scientometrics, 61(1): 129-145.

20.

Rostum, Hussein. 2003. The Information Imperative : A Framework for Measuring Impacts of STM Information Services and STM Information Organizations. Ottawa: CISTI.

21.

Rosvall, Martin and Carl T. Bergstrom. 2008. “Maps of Random Walks on Complex Networks Reveal Community Structure.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(4): 1118-1123.

22.

Stark, W. and A.E. Bourgeois. 2003. Building theSTM Knowledge Infrastructure : A Feasibility Study. Toronto: Federal Science eLibrary.

23.

Tenopir, Carol & D.W. King. 1998. “Designing the Future of Electronic Journals with Lessons Learned from the Past : Economic and Use Patterns of Scientific Journals.” Journal of Electronic Publishing, 4(2) [cited 2009.4.19]. <http://www.press.umich.edu/jep/04-02/king.html>.

24.

Tenopir, Carol and Donald King. 2000. Towards Electronic Journals : Realities for Scientists, Librarians and Publishers. Washington. D.C.: SLA Publishing.

25.

World Trade Organization. 2007. International Trade Statistics. Geneva: WTO.

26.

文部科學省 科学技術政策研究所 科学技術指標プロジェクトチーム 編. 2004. ꡔ科学技術 指標 : 日本の科學技術の體系的分析ꡕ. 東京 : 文部科学省.

27.

歳 森敦. 2004. 日本国内における学術雑誌の購読状況:電子ジャーナルを中心に. [cited 2009.5.15]. <http://www.kc.tsukuba.ac.jp/colloqium/040715.pdf>.

28.

歳森 敦 外. 2005. ꡔ電子情報環境下における科学技術情報の蓄積・流通の在り方に関す る調査研究ꡕ. 東京 : 国立国会図書館.

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science