-검정.jpg){kind=logo}
- P-ISSN1225-598X
- E-ISSN2982-6292
실무자의 근거출판 활성화를 통한 근거중심 문헌정보실무의 국내 적용 방안
The Study on the Applying Methods for EBLIP in Korean Librarianship
초록
EBLIP는 ‘근거’를 중심으로 실무에서 문제해결 및 의사결정을 정확히 수행하고자 하는 실천 운동이다. 본 연구에서는 이러한 실천 운동의 국내 적용을 실무자들의 근거 출판 활성화를 통해 수행하고자 하였다. 국내 5종의 학술지에 수록된 논문의 내용분석을 통해 국내 실무자들의 근거 생산 현황을 파악하고 실무자들의 표적집단면담으로 근거 생산 장애 요인과 사서들의 인식을 조사하였다. 근거생산에 실무자가 저자로 포함된 경우는 26%를 차지하나, 실무자 단독으로 출판을 한 경우는 9.2%이며 단독 저자인 실무자들의 소속 기관은 대학도서관이 36.4%로 가장 높게 나타났다. 표적집단면담을 통해서 나타난 실무자의 출판 장애요인은 조직적인 차원에서 가장 많이 나타났으며 근거출판 활성화를 위해서 조직의 적극적인 지원을 요구하고 있었다. 본 연구는 이러한 조사결과를 바탕으로 실무자들의 근거 생산 활성화 방안을 조직차원, 연구결과 소통의 차원, 교육차원에서 제안하였다. 조직차원에서는 업무 중 연구 활동의 보장, 연구결과에 대한 보상, 연구 소통의 차원에서는 실무자들이 연구 결과를 용이하게 접하고 활용할 수 있는 새로운 성격의 저널 창간과 구조적 초록과 같은 방안을 제안하였다. 끝으로 실무현장에서 연구방법론 교육의 강화와 통합 연구의 한 방안인 체계적 고찰에 대한 교육을 강조하였다.
- keywords
- 근거중심 문헌정보실무, 실무자, 연구, evidence-based library and information practice, evidence-based practice, librarianship, practitioner, research, evidence-based library and information practice, evidence-based practice, librarianship, practitioner, research
Abstract
EBLIP seeks to improve library practice by utilizing the best available evidence in conjunction with a pragmatic perspective developed from working experiences in librarianship. The purpose of this study is to apply the evidence-based library and information practice(EBLIP) in Korean librarianship with encouraging the practitioners to publish in their workplace. Content analysis on papers accepted for publication among five LIS journals and focus group interview were performed in order to investigate the contexts and perceptions on the publishing activities of practicing librarians. While the proportion of papers that librarians wrote was calculated at 26 percent among the sample, the percentage of papers with librarians as a single author was only 9.2. Significant obstacles for librarians to publish papers due to organizational level were observed. The author suggests organizational support and better framework for communicating research based on practice such as publication of evidence-based practical journal and the adoption of structural abstract. The findings reinforce the importance of teaching rigorous research methods in workplace.
- keywords
- 근거중심 문헌정보실무, 실무자, 연구, evidence-based library and information practice, evidence-based practice, librarianship, practitioner, research, evidence-based library and information practice, evidence-based practice, librarianship, practitioner, research
참고문헌
박명화. 2006. 근거중심 간호의 이해와 적용 . 서울: 군자출판사.
박소연. 2002. 연구방법론 과목의 교육내용 및 현황분석. ꡔ한국도서관․정보학회지ꡕ, 33(2): 1-17.
이은철, 김갑선. 2004. 대학도서관 사서의 연구활용 장애. ꡔ한국문헌정보학회지ꡕ, 38(1): 78-91.
표순희. 2009. 근거중심 문헌정보실무의 내용과 방법론에 관한 연구. ꡔ정보관리학회지ꡕ, 26(1): 351-370.
Ali, S. Nazim. 1985. “Library science research: some results of its disseminiation and utilization." Libri. 35(2): 151-162.
Booth, Andrew. 2009. “A bridge too far? stepping stones for evidence based practice in an academic context." New Review of Academic Librarianship. 15(3): 3-34.
Booth, Andrew, & Anne Brice, ed. 2004. Appraising the evidence. in Evidence-based practice for information professionals: a handbook. London: Facet Publishing.
Crumley, Ellen, & Denise Koufogiannakis. 2002. “Developing evidence-based librarianship: practical steps for implementation." Health Information and Libraries Journal, 19: 61-70.
Eldredge, Johathan. 2002. “Evidence-based librarianship: what might we expect in the years ahead?" Health Information Libraries Journal, 19(2): 71-77.
Eldredge, Johathan. 2006. “Evidence-based librarianship: the EBL process." Library HiTech, 24(3): 341-354.
Finnie, Elizabeth, Barbara Frame, & Ian Stewart. 2000. “Research by New Zealand library practitioners." New Zealand Libraries, 49(3): 83-87.
Haddow, Gaby, & Jane E. Klobas. 2004. “Communication of research to practice in library and information sciecne: closing the gap." Library & Information Sciecne Research, 26: 29-34.
Hahs-Vaughn, Debbie, & Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie. 2010. “Quality of abstracts in articles submitted to a scholarly journal: a mixed methods case study of the journal research in the schools." Library & Information Science Research, 32:53-61.
Hildreth, Charles R., & Selenay Aytac. 2007. “Recent library practitioner research: a methodological analysis and critique." Journal of Education for Library and Information Science. 48(3): 236-258.
Jadad, Alejandro R., David Moher, & Terry P. Klassen. 1998. “Guides for Reading and Interpreting Systematic Reviews." Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 152: 700-704.
Khan, Khalid S., Regina Kunz, Jos Kleijnen, & Gerd Antes. 2003. Systematic reviews to support evidence-based medicine: how to review and apply findings of healthcare research. London: The Royal Society of Medicine Press Limited.
Koufogiannakis, Denise, & Ellen Crumley. 2004. Applying evidence to your everyday practice. Edited by Andrew Booth, & Anne Brice. Evidence-based practice for information professionals: a handbook. London: Facet Publishing.
Powell, Ronald R., & Lynn Silipigni Connaway. 2004. Basic research methods for librarians. Westport: Libraries Unlimited.
Powell, Ronald R., Lynda M. Baker, & Joseph J. Mika. 2002. “Library and information science practitioners and research." Library & Information Science Research, 24: 49-72.
Roberts, Albert R., Kenneth Yeager, & Cheryl Regehr. 2006. Bridging Evidence-Based Health Care and social work: how to search for, develop, and use evidence-based studies. Edited by Albert R. Roberts, & Kenneth R. Yearger. Foundation of evidence-based social work practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schlögll, Christian, & Wolfgang G. Stock. 2007. “Practitioners and academics as authors and readers: the case of LIS journals." Journal of Documentation, 64(5): 643-666.
Turner, Kathlyn. 2002. “Do information professionals use research published in LIS journal?" 68th IFLA Council and General Confernece. 2002 August 18-24. [Glasgow: IFLA].
Watson-Boone, Rebecca. 2000. “Academic libraries as practitioner-researchers." The Jounral of Academic Librarainship, 26(2): 85-93.
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
- 0KCI 피인용수
- 0WOS 피인용수