바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science

  • P-ISSN1225-598X
  • E-ISSN2982-6292

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.44 No.3

Citation Share

The Study on the Applying Methods for EBLIP in Korean Librarianship

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science / Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2010, v.44 no.3, pp.219-239
https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2010.44.3.219

(2010). The Study on the Applying Methods for EBLIP in Korean Librarianship. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 44(3), 219-239, https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2010.44.3.219

Abstract

EBLIP seeks to improve library practice by utilizing the best available evidence in conjunction with a pragmatic perspective developed from working experiences in librarianship. The purpose of this study is to apply the evidence-based library and information practice(EBLIP) in Korean librarianship with encouraging the practitioners to publish in their workplace. Content analysis on papers accepted for publication among five LIS journals and focus group interview were performed in order to investigate the contexts and perceptions on the publishing activities of practicing librarians. While the proportion of papers that librarians wrote was calculated at 26 percent among the sample, the percentage of papers with librarians as a single author was only 9.2. Significant obstacles for librarians to publish papers due to organizational level were observed. The author suggests organizational support and better framework for communicating research based on practice such as publication of evidence-based practical journal and the adoption of structural abstract. The findings reinforce the importance of teaching rigorous research methods in workplace.

keywords
근거중심 문헌정보실무, 실무자, 연구, evidence-based library and information practice, evidence-based practice, librarianship, practitioner, research, evidence-based library and information practice, evidence-based practice, librarianship, practitioner, research

Reference

1.

박명화. 2006. 근거중심 간호의 이해와 적용 . 서울: 군자출판사.

2.

박소연. 2002. 연구방법론 과목의 교육내용 및 현황분석. ꡔ한국도서관․정보학회지ꡕ, 33(2): 1-17.

3.

이은철, 김갑선. 2004. 대학도서관 사서의 연구활용 장애. ꡔ한국문헌정보학회지ꡕ, 38(1): 78-91.

4.

표순희. 2009. 근거중심 문헌정보실무의 내용과 방법론에 관한 연구. ꡔ정보관리학회지ꡕ, 26(1): 351-370.

5.

Ali, S. Nazim. 1985. “Library science research: some results of its disseminiation and utilization." Libri. 35(2): 151-162.

6.

Booth, Andrew. 2009. “A bridge too far? stepping stones for evidence based practice in an academic context." New Review of Academic Librarianship. 15(3): 3-34.

7.

Booth, Andrew, & Anne Brice, ed. 2004. Appraising the evidence. in Evidence-based practice for information professionals: a handbook. London: Facet Publishing.

8.

Crumley, Ellen, & Denise Koufogiannakis. 2002. “Developing evidence-based librarianship: practical steps for implementation." Health Information and Libraries Journal, 19: 61-70.

9.

Eldredge, Johathan. 2002. “Evidence-based librarianship: what might we expect in the years ahead?" Health Information Libraries Journal, 19(2): 71-77.

10.

Eldredge, Johathan. 2006. “Evidence-based librarianship: the EBL process." Library HiTech, 24(3): 341-354.

11.

Finnie, Elizabeth, Barbara Frame, & Ian Stewart. 2000. “Research by New Zealand library practitioners." New Zealand Libraries, 49(3): 83-87.

12.

Haddow, Gaby, & Jane E. Klobas. 2004. “Communication of research to practice in library and information sciecne: closing the gap." Library & Information Sciecne Research, 26: 29-34.

13.

Hahs-Vaughn, Debbie, & Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie. 2010. “Quality of abstracts in articles submitted to a scholarly journal: a mixed methods case study of the journal research in the schools." Library & Information Science Research, 32:53-61.

14.

Hildreth, Charles R., & Selenay Aytac. 2007. “Recent library practitioner research: a methodological analysis and critique." Journal of Education for Library and Information Science. 48(3): 236-258.

15.

Jadad, Alejandro R., David Moher, & Terry P. Klassen. 1998. “Guides for Reading and Interpreting Systematic Reviews." Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 152: 700-704.

16.

Khan, Khalid S., Regina Kunz, Jos Kleijnen, & Gerd Antes. 2003. Systematic reviews to support evidence-based medicine: how to review and apply findings of healthcare research. London: The Royal Society of Medicine Press Limited.

17.

Koufogiannakis, Denise, & Ellen Crumley. 2004. Applying evidence to your everyday practice. Edited by Andrew Booth, & Anne Brice. Evidence-based practice for information professionals: a handbook. London: Facet Publishing.

18.

Powell, Ronald R., & Lynn Silipigni Connaway. 2004. Basic research methods for librarians. Westport: Libraries Unlimited.

19.

Powell, Ronald R., Lynda M. Baker, & Joseph J. Mika. 2002. “Library and information science practitioners and research." Library & Information Science Research, 24: 49-72.

20.

Roberts, Albert R., Kenneth Yeager, & Cheryl Regehr. 2006. Bridging Evidence-Based Health Care and social work: how to search for, develop, and use evidence-based studies. Edited by Albert R. Roberts, & Kenneth R. Yearger. Foundation of evidence-based social work practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

21.

Schlögll, Christian, & Wolfgang G. Stock. 2007. “Practitioners and academics as authors and readers: the case of LIS journals." Journal of Documentation, 64(5): 643-666.

22.

Turner, Kathlyn. 2002. “Do information professionals use research published in LIS journal?" 68th IFLA Council and General Confernece. 2002 August 18-24. [Glasgow: IFLA].

23.

Watson-Boone, Rebecca. 2000. “Academic libraries as practitioner-researchers." The Jounral of Academic Librarainship, 26(2): 85-93.

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science

e-Submission OA Policy