바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.44 No.4
Citation Share

도서관발전종합계획(2009~2013)에 대한 평가모형 개발 및 적용에 관한 연구

A Study on the Development and Application of a Model for Evaluating the Comprehensive Library Advancement Plan(2009～2013)

한국문헌정보학회지 / Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2010, v.44 no.4, pp.303-331
https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2010.44.4.303
차성종 (문화체육관광부)
차성종. (2010). 도서관발전종합계획(2009~2013)에 대한 평가모형 개발 및 적용에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 44(4), 303-331, https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2010.44.4.303
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수
PDF 다운로드

초록

도서관발전종합계획(2009~2013)의 본격적인 시행으로 종합계획의 형성 및 집행에 참여하는 중앙행정기관, 지자체 등 참여대상이 증가하고 정책 환경이 복잡하게 전개되고 있지만, 이러한 상황을 제대로 분석하고 짚어내는 도서관정책 전반에 대한 평가 및 연구는 미흡하였다. 본 연구는 도서관발전종합계획(2009～2013)을 정책형성단계, 정책집행단계, 정책성과단계의 3단계로 나누어 각 정책과정의 요인들이 정책성과에 미치는 영향관계 등을 검증하여 종합계획 시행의 문제점 및 개선방향을 분석하는 것을 목적으로 하였다. 이를 위해 도서관발전종합계획(2009～2013)의 정책과정을 평가하기 위한 형성적 평가모형을 설계하고, 도서관정책 전문가 그룹이 참여하는 델파이 조사를 통해 개발된 평가모형을 수정․보완하는 절차를 거쳤다. 그리고 실제 종합계획을 수립․시행중인 도서관정책 관계자를 대상으로 실증적인 평가를 실시한 후, 이 평가결과를 토대로 정책단계별 요인이 정책성과에 미치는 영향관계 등을 실증적으로 분석하였다.

keywords
도서관정책, 도서관발전종합계획(2009～2013), 도서관 중장기계획, 정책평가, Library Policy, Policy Evaluation, Long-term Promotion Plan for Library Policy, Library Policy, Policy Evaluation, Long-term Promotion Plan for Library Policy

Abstract

With the full execution of the Comprehensive Library Advancement Plan(2009～2013), related bodies and participants, including national administrative agencies and local government, are increasing and the policy environments are intricately being expanded as well. However, there has been insufficient research on the general aspects of library policies to analyze and evaluate the current circumstances. The objective of this study is to analyze both the problems and suggestions in the areas that need improvements implementing this comprehensive plan. Accordingly, we designed a formative model for evaluating the policy process relating to the comprehensive plan, and then modified and supplemented the developed plan based on the Delphi method utilized by library policy experts. We conducted an empirical evaluation of library policy officials who have established and implemented the comprehensive plan. We then used the evaluation results to assess the effects of the factors regarding the accomplishments reached each policy stage.

keywords
도서관정책, 도서관발전종합계획(2009～2013), 도서관 중장기계획, 정책평가, Library Policy, Policy Evaluation, Long-term Promotion Plan for Library Policy, Library Policy, Policy Evaluation, Long-term Promotion Plan for Library Policy

참고문헌

1.

남진우. 1995. 정책 평가의 활용성에 관한 이론적 고찰 . 석사학위논문, 단국대학교 대학원, 행정학과.

2.

노동조. 2007. 문화관광부의 도서관발전종합계획(2003-2011)에 대한 타당성 평가에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지 , 41(3): 165-179.

3.

노화준. 2006. 정책평가론 . 서울: 법문사.

4.

도서관정보정책위원회. 2008. 도서관발전종합계획(2009～2013) . [서울]: 도서관정보정책위원회.

5.

윤수재. 2003. 우리나라 중앙정부의 정책평가시스템 발전방향. 한국정책분석평가학회 춘계학술대회 논문집 , 2003. 5. 3: 17-34.

6.

이재원. 2007. 학교도서관 정책 평가모형 개발과 적용에 관한 연구: ‘학교도서관 활성화 종합방안’을 중심으로 . 박사학위논문, 경기대학교 대학원, 문헌정보학과.

7.

Anderson, James E. 1979. Public Policy Making(2nd ed.). NY: Holt Rinehart and Winston.

8.

Anderson, James E. 1984. Public Policy Making(3rd ed.). NY: Holt Rinehart and Winston.

9.

Dowling, Michael. 2001. “Libraries, Librarians and Library Associations in the United States in 2001: Making a Difference in the Knowledge Age." IFLA Journal, 27(3): 133-142.

10.

Deegan, M., S. Tanner. 2002. Digital Futures: Strategies for the Information Age. Neal- Schuman.

11.

Department for Education Skills. 2004. Improve your library: A self-evaluation process for secondary school libraries and learning resource centers. London: Author.

12.

Dror, Y. 1963. “The Planning Process: A Facet Design." International Review of Administrative Science, 30(1): 61-68.

13.

Dror, Y. 1968. Public Policy Making Reexamined. Scranton Penn: Chandler Publishing Company.

14.

Dunn, William N. 1981. Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction. NJ: Prenitce-Hall.

15.

Dye, Thomas. R. 1981. Understanding Public Policy. NJ: Prenitce-Hall.

16.

Easton, D. A. 1965. Systems of Political Life. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

17.

Elisam Mogara, and Joyce Bukirwa Nyumba. 2004. “Towards a school library development policy for Uganda." Library Review, 53(6): 313-322.

18.

Giappiconi, Thierry. 1995. “Library evaluation and public policy: a French view." Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 27(2): 99-108.

19.

Gildersleeves, Lucy. 2006. “Evaluating evaluation Introducing a research project on the impact of Improve Your Library: A Self-Evaluation Process for School Libraries." Aslib Proceeedings: New Information, 58(1/2): 73-88.

20.

Grumm, John G. 1975. “The Analysis of Policy Impact." Handbook of Political Science, 6: 439-441.

21.

Johnson, Ian M., Williams, Dorothy A., Wavell, Caroline, and Baxter, Graeme. 2004. “Impact evaluating professional practice, and policy making." New Library World, 105(1196/1197): 33-46.

22.

Kettunen, Juha. 2007. “The strategic evaluation of academic libraries.” Library hi tech, 25(3): 409-421.

23.

Lasswell, Harold D. 1956. The Decision Process: Seven Categories of Functional Analysis. College Park: University of Maryland.

24.

Lasswell, Harold D., & Kaplan, A. 1970. Power and Society. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.

25.

Levitt, R, Steele, J., and Thompson, H. 2000. “The Library and Information Commission: an evaluation of its policy work and underpinning research.” Library and Information Commission research report, 67: 39-58.

26.

Lindblom, C. 1968. The Policy-making Process. NJ: Prenitce-Hall.

27.

Makin, Louise, and Craven Jenny. 1999. “Changing libraries: the impact of national policy on UK library services." Library Management, 20(8): 425-430.

28.

Marcum, D. 2003. “Requirements for the Future of Digital Libraries." Journal of Academic Librarianship, 29(5): 276-289.

29.

McNicol, Sarah. 2005. “The challenges of strategic planning in academic libraries.” New library world, 106(11/12): 496-509.

30.

Nachmias, D. 1979. Public Policy Evaluation. NY: St. Matin's Press.

31.

Nakamura, R. T., & Smallwood, F. P. 1980. The Politics of Policy Implementation. NY: St. Matin's Press.

32.

Nozero, Victoria, and Finley, Priscilla. 2005. “Research and Information Services at Lied Library: Restructured, revitalized and planning for the future." Library hi tech, 23(1): 66-74.

33.

Poister, T.H. 1979. Public Program Analysis: Applied Research Method. Baltimore: University Park Press.

34.

Ripley, R. B., & Franklin, G. A. 1986. Public Implementation and Bureaucracy. Homewood: Dorcy.

35.

Scriven, M. 1972. The Methodology of Evaluation. Edited by C.H. Weiss. Evaluating Action Programs: Readings in Social Action and Education. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 123-136.

36.

Streafield, D., and Markless, S. 2005. “Putting school libraries back into the picture." Library Information Update, 4(6): 36-38.

37.

Stufflebeam, D. L. 1974. Educational Evaluation and Decision making. NY: F. E. Peacock Publishers.

38.

Suchman, E. A. 1967. Evaluative Research. NY: Russel Sage Foundation.

39.

Wholey, J. S. 1976. Federal Evaluation Policy. Washington D.C: The Urban Institute.

40.

Willard, P. 1995. “Public sector reform in Australia and its impact on libraries." The International information & library review, 27(4): 359-373.

41.

Wolf, Harvey. 1987. “Evaluating Libraries Using Maut Bayesian." Library Management, 8(2): 36-42.

한국문헌정보학회지

논문 투고 OA 정책