바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

An Analysis of Teacher Librarians' Preference on Subjects for their Customized Intensive In-Service Training Program

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science / Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2011, v.45 no.2, pp.163-184
https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2011.45.2.163

  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

The aim of this study is providing basic data to design successful in-service training program for teacher librarians by analyzing their preference on subjects of customized intensive programs for indicators of teacher expertise development. According to the survey, teacher librarians seem to regard training subjects such as Reading Education and Information Literacy Instruction related educational information services as core jobs and prefer developing instructional contents and materials. Under the levels of school it seems that teacher librarians in the elementary school are interested in programs for library activation, management of volunteers, analyses of users’ needs and curricula, evaluations of user instruction and information literacy instruction. Older teacher librarians favor an understanding of metadata, building and supporting information system and instruction. Therefore, training subjects for teacher librarians should be formed by linking strategies between school library instruction and subject curricula. And in terms of the method of training, case studies and practical training might be better than lectures based on the theory.

keywords
Teacher Librarian, Customized Intensive Training, Teacher Expertise Development, In-Service Training Program, Training Subjects, School Library, Teacher Librarian, Customized Intensive Training, Teacher Expertise Development, In-Service Training Program, Training Subjects, School Library, 사서교사, 맞춤형 심화연수, 교원능력개발평가, 현직연수 프로그램, 연수과목, 학교도서관

Reference

1.

국가법령정보센터. [online]. [cited 2011.2.20]. <http://www.law.go.kr>.

2.

교육과학기술부. 2010. 2010학년도 교원능력개발평가 표준 매뉴얼 . 서울: 교육과학기술부 교직발전기획과.

3.

교육과학기술연수원. 2010. 맞춤형 교원연수 프로그램 개발을 위한 권역별시․도 담당자 워크숍 .서울: 교육과학기술연수원.

4.

광주광역시교육연수원. 2010a. 사서교사 맞춤형 교원연수 프로그램 개발 결과보고서 . 광주: 광주광역시교육연수원.

5.

광주광역시교육연수원. 2010b. 교원능력개발평가대비 사서교사 맞춤형 시범연수 . 광주: 광주광역시교육연수원.

6.

김성준. 2009. 사서교사의 전문성 인식에 관한 연구. 한국도서관․정보학회지 , 40(3): 249-270.

7.

김종성. 2006. 사서교사 양성을 위한 문헌정보학 교과목의 내용과 교육의 전략적 강조점에 관한연구. 한국비블리아학회지 , 17(1): 135-159.

8.

문화체육관광부. 2008. 디지털자료실 활성화 방안 연구 . 서울: 문화체육관광부.

9.

박지혜, 최희준. 2009. 교원능력개발평가 사서교사 평가지표와 문항의 중요도 및 수행도에 대한사서교사의 인식. 한국도서관․정보학회지 , 40(4): 93-111.

10.

송기호. 2008. 학교도서관 운영의 실제 . 개정3판. 서울: 한국도서관협회.

11.

정일환, 강용원. 2000. 교원 현직연수의 발전 방향 탐색. 교육학논총 , 21(1): 327-340.

12.

Hughes-Hassell, Sandra, & Harada, Violet H. 2007. School Reform and the School LibraryMedia Specialist. Wesport: Libraries Unlimited.

13.

Miller, Susan. 2005. “Professional development for the library media specialist." The WholeSchool Library Handbook. Chicago: American Library Association.

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science