바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.45 No.4
Citation Share

A Study on the Impact of Users' Place Attachment on the Value of Public Libraries

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science / Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2011, v.45 no.4, pp.209-234
https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2011.45.4.209

(2011). A Study on the Impact of Users' Place Attachment on the Value of Public Libraries. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 45(4), 209-234, https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2011.45.4.209
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to verify effects between the place attachment and the place value in public libraries; and also to identify whether frequency and purpose of usage, length of residence, and website use play a moderating role in the influential relationship between users' place attachment and the perception of place value for public libraries. Users' place dependence affected the library's value positively(+) due to moderating effect of usage frequency of the library and the users' length of residence. In order to estimate the moderating effect by purpose of use, the groups were divided by purpose of library use and the relationship between place attachment and place value by groups were analyzed. However, website usage bore no effect on users' place attachment or perception of place value to their local library. This study showed that place attachment as an affective indicator on users is very useful variable to explain the value of libraries as a social and cultural place.

keywords
Public Library, Sense of Place, Place Attachment, Place Value, Library as Place, 공공도서관, 장소, 장소성, 장소애착도, 장소가치, Public Library, Sense of Place, Place Attachment, Place Value, Library as Place

Reference

1.

강신겸, 최승담. 2002. 관광지 지역주민의 지역사회 애착도 측정 척도 개발. 관광학연구 , 26(1):103-117.

2.

강홍빈. 1998. 근대화의 도시풍경: 신주작대로 기행 . 서울: 박영사.

3.

권은경. 1997. 도서관의 본질과 미래도서관상에 관한 고찰. 한국도서관․정보학회 하계 학술발표회 , 1-21.

4.

김동근. 2008. 주거지역의 장소애착 형성에 관한 연구 . 박사학위논문, 서울대학교 대학원, 지구환경시스템공학부.

5.

김지예. 2008. 문학작품에 나타난 장소감의 변화 . 석사학위논문, 공주대학교 대학원, 지리교육전공.

6.

박청인. 2000. 국립공원 취락지구 주민의 귀속감이 공원관리에 미치는 영향의 탐색적 연구. 국토계획 , 35(1): 129-139.

7.

양재한. 2000. 공공도서관의 성립과 사회적 역할 . 서울: 태일사.

8.

윤유식, 곽용섭. 2005. 지역주민의 장소애착심에 따른 관광지 평가에 관한 연구. 호텔리조트카지노연구 , 4(2): 511-525.

9.

이은숙. 2005. 장소에 대한 애착의 개념구조. 사회과학연구 , 20: 1-16.

10.

이정호. 2010. 공공도서관의 장소성 형성구조에 관한 연구 . 박사학위논문, 성균관대학교 대학원,문헌정보학과.

11.

이주호. 2009. 장소이미지, 체험가치, 그리고 재방문의도 관계 연구 . 박사학위논문, 강원대학교.

12.

차미경. 2006. 유비쿼터스 시대 도서관 공간에 관한 연구. 한국비블리아학회지 , 17(1): 325-343.

13.

최막중, 김미옥. 2001. 장소성의 형성요인과 경제적 가치에 관한 실증분석: 대학로와 로데오 거리사례를 중심으로. 국토계획 , 36(2): 153-162.

14.

최열, 임하경. 2005. 장소애착 인지 및 결정요인 분석. 국토계획 , 40(2): 53-64.

15.

Altman, I., & Low, S. M., ed. 1992. “Place Attachment.” Human Behavior, and Environment:Advances in Theory and Research, vol.12. New-York: Plenum Press.

16.

Antell, K., & Engel, D. 2006. “Conduciveness to scholarship: The essence of academic libraryas place." College & Research Libraries, 67(6): 536-560.

17.

Audunson, R. 2004. “The public library as a meeting-place in a multicultural and digitalcontext." Journal of Documentation, 61(3): 429-441.

18.

Bricker, K. S., & Kerstetter, D. L. 2000. “Level of specialization and place attachment:An exploratory study of whitewater recreationists." Leisure Sciences, 22(4): 233-257.

19.

Brown, B., Perkins, D. D., & Brown, G. 2003. “Place attachment in a revitalizing neighborhood:Individual and block levels of analysis." Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(3): 259-271.

20.

Entrikin, J. N. 1991. The Betweenness of Place: Towards a Geography of Modernity.Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

21.

Feldman, R. M. 1990. “Settlement-identity: psychological bonds with home places in amobile society." Environment and Behavior, 22(2): 183-229.

22.

Given, L. M., & Leckie, G. J. 2003. “‘Sweeping’ the library: Mapping the social activityspace of the public library." Library and Information Science Research, 25(4): 365-385.

23.

Gorman, M. 2006. “President's message: Get smart." American Libraries, 37. [online]. [cited2011.8.14]. <http://mg.csufresno.edu/columns/AL0106p004.pdf>.

24.

Gregory, Brown, & Raymond, Christopher. 2007. “The relationship between place attachmentand landscape values: Toward mapping place attachment." Applied Geography, 27(2):89-111.

25.

Hammitt, W. E., Kyle, G. T., & Oh, C. O. 2009. “Comparison of place bonding models inrecreation resource management." Journal of Leisure Research, 41(1): 57-72.

26.

Hummon, D. M. 1992. “Community attachment: Local sentiment and sense of place." PlaceAttachment, 12: 253-278.

27.

Kasarda, J. D., & Janowitz, M. 1974. “Community attachment in mass society." AmericanSociological Review, 39: 328-339.

28.

Kyle, G. T., Mowen, A. J., & Tarrant, M. 2004. “Linking place preferences with placemeaning: An examination of the relationship between place motivation and place attachment."Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(4): 439-454.

29.

Lewicka, M. 2005. “Ways to make people active: The role of place attachment, culturalcapital, and neighborhood ties." Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(4): 381-395.

30.

Mathwick, C., Malhotra, N., & Rigdon, E. 2001. “Experiential value: Conceptualization,measurement and application in the catalog and internet shopping environment." Journalof Retailing, 77(1): 39-56.

31.

Moore, R. L., & Graefe, A. R. 1994. “Attachments to recreation settings: The case of railtrailusers." Leisure Sciences, 16(1): 17-31.

32.

Most, L. R. 2009. The Rural Public Library as Place in North Florida: A Case Study. Ph.D.diss., The Florida State University, School of Library & Information Studies.

33.

Myall, C. 1999. “The library as place." ALKI, 15(3): 4.

34.

Proshansky, H. M. 1978. “The city and self-identity." Environment and Behavior, 10(2):147-169.

35.

Proshansky, H. M., Fabian, A. K., & Kaminoff, R. 1983. “Place-identity: Physical worldsocialization of the self." Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3: 57-83.

36.

Relph, E. 1976. Place and Placelessness. London: Pion London.

37.

Schreyer, R., et al. 1981. “Environmental meaning as a determinant of spatial behaviourin recreation." In Proceedings of the Applied Geography Conferences, 294-300.

38.

Shill, H. B., & Tonner, S. 2003. “Creating a better place: Physical improvements in academiclibraries, 1995–2002." College & Research Libraries, 64(6): 431-466.

39.

Stokols, D., & Shumaker, S. A. 1981. “People in places: A transactional view of settings."Cognition, Social Behavior, and the Environment. Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate.

40.

Stokowski, P. A., & Lee, R. G. 1991. “The Influence of social network ties on recreationand leisure: An exploratory study." Journal of Leisure Research, 23(2): 95-113.

41.

Tuan, Y. F. 1980. “Rootedness versus sense of place." Landscape, 24(1): 3-8.

42.

Williams, D. R., Patterson, M. E., Roggenbuck, J. W., & Watson, A. E. 1992. “Beyond thecommodity metaphor: Examining emotional and symbolic attachment to place." LeisureSciences, 14(1): 29-46.

43.

Williams, D. R., & Roggenbuck, J. W. 1989. “Measuring place attachment: Some preliminaryresults." In Symposium on Outdoor Recreation Planning and Management, National Recreationand Park Association Research Symposium on Leisure Research. [San Antonio, USA].

44.

Williams, D. R., Anderson, B. S., McDonald, C. D., & Patterson, M. E. 1995. “Measuringplace attachment: More preliminary results." In Symposium on Outdoor Recreation Planningand Management, National Recreation and Park Association Leisure Research Symposium,October, 1995. [San Antonio, TX].

45.

Yuan, Y. H., & Wu, Chihkang. 2008. “Relationships among experiential marketing, experientialvalue, and customer satisfaction." Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 32(3): 387-410.

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science

e-Submission OA Policy