바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.46 No.2
Citation Share

A Study on the User-contributed Reviews for the Next Generation Library Catalogs

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science / Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2012, v.46 no.2, pp.115-132
https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2012.46.2.115

(2012). A Study on the User-contributed Reviews for the Next Generation Library Catalogs. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 46(2), 115-132, https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2012.46.2.115
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the current status of user-contributed reviews for the Next Generation Library Catalogs, and the potential impact of user reviews available from the external sources, including Amazon.com and GoodReads.com. During the period of February 16th through April 4th, 2012, the number of holding libraries and user-contributed reviews, tags and reading lists of ten selected books were examined from the WorldCat. Also the user-contributed reviews for the same books available from Amazon.com and GoodReads.com were examined, and a case of reviews for one book was analyzed. The result shows that only a few users participated in the WorldCat, and user-contributed reviews were rarely used, when compared with tags or reading lists. Several hundred to thousand user-contributed reviews for the same books were available from Amazon.com and GoodReads.com directly linked with bibliographic records. A case of one book from Amazon.com reveals the possibility of distorting the function of user-contribution. With the introduction of the function of user-contribution, it is expected that its growth rate should be carefully observed and its potential impact on users should be thoroughly and systematically analyzed in the near future.

keywords
Next Generation Library Catalog, WorldCat, User Contribution, User-contributed Reviews, Amazon.com, GoodReads.com, 차세대 도서관 목록, WorldCat, 이용자 참여, 이용자 서평, 아마존, 굿리즈닷컴, Next Generation Library Catalog, WorldCat, User Contribution, User-contributed Reviews, Amazon.com, GoodReads.com

Reference

1.

구중억, 곽승진. 2007. 차세대 OPAC의 인터페이스와 기능에 관한 연구. 『한국비블리아학회지』, 18(2): 61-88.

2.

김상호. 1994. 문헌비평을 위한 서평의 분석적 고찰: 서평문화와 출판저널을 중심으로. 『한국비블리아학회지』, 7(1): 247-262.

3.

노동조, 민숙희. 2011. 대학도서관 웹사이트 분석을 통한 도서관 2.0 기반 서비스 운영실태 분석. 『정보관리연구』, 42(4): 195-223.

4.

심 경. 2008a. 차세대 도서관 목록. 『도서관문화』, 49(9): 22-28.

5.

심 경. 2008b. 차세대 도서관 목록의 사례: AquaBrowser. 『도서관문화』, 49(10): 48-56.

6.

심 경. 2008c. 차세대 도서관 목록의 사례 (2): WorldCat Local. 『도서관문화』, 49(11): 54-61.

7.

윤정옥. 2012. 도서관 목록의 지식 확산 도구 역할에 관한 시론: WorldCat을 중심으로. 『한국도서관․정보학회지』, 43(1): 123-141.

8.

윤정옥. 2010. 차세대 도서관 목록 사례의 고찰. 『한국도서관․정보학회지』, 41(1): 1-28.

9.

이지연, 민지연. 2008. 라이브러리 2.0에 대한 이용자 인식 및 요구사항에 관한 실증적 연구. 『한국문헌정보학회지』, 42(1): 213-231.

10.

이현실. 2009. OPAC 접근 향상을 위한 도서관 툴바의 제공 및 사서 평가 연구 - W대학 도서관 사례를 중심으로. 『한국도서관․정보학회지』, 40(3): 157-180.

11.

이현실, 배창섭, 이은주, 한성국. 2009. 지식 서비스 지향 도서관 시스템의 논리 모델. 『정보관리학회지』, 26(3): 45-67.

12.

임종업. 2011. MB 영문 자서전 아마존서 찬바람. 『한겨레신문』, 11월 13일.

13.

최경준, 설갑수. 2012. 이대통령 영문 자서전, 미국서 1014권 팔려, 홍보비만 1억 이상... 스티브잡스가 통곡할 일. 『OhmyNews』, 1월 25일. [online]. [cited 2012.2.5]. <http://www.ohmynews.com/NWS_Web/view/at_pg.aspx?CNTN_CD=A0001688922>.

14.

Arko, R. A., Ginger, K. M., Kastens, K. A., & Weatherly, J. 2006. “Using annotations to add value to a digital library for education.” D-Lib Magazine, 2(3). [online]. [cited 2012.2.6]. <www.dlib.org/may06/arko/05arko.html>.

15.

Breeding, Marshall. 2010. “State of the art in Library Discovery 2010.” Computers in Libraries, 31(1): 31-35.

16.

Breeding, Marshall. 2007a. “Next-Generation Catalogs.” Library Technology Reports, 43(4): 1-44.

17.

Breeding, Marshall. 2007b. “Small world: OCLC launches WorldCat Local.” Small Libraries Newsletter, 27(6): 3.

18.

Breeding, Marshall. 2004. “Integrated library software: A guide to multiuser, multifunction systems.” Library Technology Reports, 40(1): 1-44.

19.

OCLC. Online Catalogs: What Users and Librarians Want: An OCLC Report. 2009. [online]. [cited 2009.12.10]. <http://www.oclc.org/reports/onlinecatalogs/fullreport.pdf>.

20.

OCLC. 홈페이지. “WorldCat Facts and Statistics.”<http://www.oclc.org/us/en/worldcat/statistics/default.htm>

21.

“WorldCat: A Global Catalog.”<http://www.oclc.org/us/en/worldcat/catalog/default.htm>

22.

“Brief history of OCLC Activities with National Libraries Outside the U.S.”<http://www.oclc.org/us/en/worldcat/catalog/national/timeline/default.htm>. [online]. [cited 2011.12.3].

23.

Sierra, Tito, Ryan, Joseph, & Wust, Markus. 2007. “Beyond OPAC 2.0: Library Catalog as versatile discovery platform.” Code{4}Lib Journal, 1. [online]. [cited 2009.12.31]. <http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/24>.

24.

Yang, Sharon Q., & Hofmann, Melissa A. 2011. “Next generation or current generation?: A study of the OPACs of 260 academic libraries in the USA and Canada.” Library Hi Tech, 29(2): 266-300.

25.

Yang, Sharon Q., & Hofmann, Melissa A. 2010. “Evaluating and comparing discovery tools: How close are we towards next generation catalog?” Library Hi Tech, 28(4): 690-709.

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science

e-Submission OA Policy