An Analysis of the Characteristics of the Subject-based Classification System

본 연구는 전통적인 문헌분류와 주제어기반 분류(Subject-Based Classification: SBC)의 상대적인 비교를 통하여 SBC 체계가 범주화 및 분류체계의 측면에서 갖는 특성을 분석함으로써 SBC의 정체성을 명확히 정립하는 데 목적이 있다. 분석을 위하여 12종의 실제 SBC 체계를 수집하여 그 체계의 전반 및 특성을 개괄하고, 범주화의 관점과 내용, 그리고 분류의 이론적 측면에서 DDC와 상대적인 방식으로 분석하였다. 분석의 결과 SBC 체계는 분류의 관점의 차이에서 비롯되는 범주화의 내용과 구조적인 측면에서 DDC와 큰 차이가 있으며, 분류체계로서의 요건이 적용되는 정도와 방식에 있어서도 기존의 문헌분류체계와 상반된 특성이 명확하게 드러남을 파악할 수 있었다. 따라서 향후 이러한 SBC의 특성을 고려한 분류론적 논의와 이론 개발이 필요함을 밝혔다.

keywords: 주제어기반 분류, 듀이프리, 공공도서관, 분류, Subject based Classification, Dewey Free, Public Libraries, Classification

Abstract

The aim of this study is to reveal the categorizational and classificatory features of the subject-based classification (SBC) as a subject organization system. For this purpose, 12 SBC schemes of public libraries were selected and a comparative analysis was made between the traditional classification system, such as DDC and SBC in terms of the categorizational aspects, and canons for the classification. As a result, there were significant and considerable differences between the two types of classifications. This study concluded that SBC cannot be clearly explained and understood without a consideration of its essential and distinctive characteristics as a classification scheme.

keywords: 주제어기반 분류, 듀이프리, 공공도서관, 분류, Subject based Classification, Dewey Free, Public Libraries, Classification

참고문헌

김명옥. 1986. ..자료분류법... 서울: 구미무역.

김태수. 1987. 콜론분류법에서의 상관계. ..정보관리학회지.., 4(2): 47-61.

김태수. 2000. ..분류의 이해... 서울: 문헌정보처리연구회.

남태우. 2006. 문헌분류법에서의 주류설정의 원리. ..한국문헌정보학회지.., 40(4): 333-366.

남태우. 2009. DDC 주류구분법에 관한 연구. ..한국문헌정보학회지.., 43(1): 27-56.

배영활. 1989. 근대주요분류표들의 형성배경과 주류 및 유형분석. ..국회도서관보.., 26(4): 3-20.

백지원. 2010. 주제어 기반 분류에 관한 연구: 미국 공공도서관의 사례를 중심으로. ..한국문헌정보학회지.., 44(4): 179-201.

백지원. 2011. 이용자 중심의 주제어 기반 분류를 위한 주제명 개발에 관한 연구: 지식조직체계분석을 바탕으로. ..정보관리학회지.., 28(1): 171-193.

백지원. 2012. 주제어기반 분류의 분류론적 개념 정립 및 발전 방안: 발전과정 및 기능 분석을통하여. ..한국비블리아학회지.., 23(4): 5-24.

10.

윤희윤. 2011. ..정보자료분류론... 대구: 태일사.

11.

정연경. 2000. 지식과 분류의 연관성에 관한 연구. ..한국비블리아학회지.., 11(2): 5-23.

12.

Baker, Sharon L., & Karen L. Wallace. 2002. The responsive public library how to develop and market a winning collection. 2nd ed. Englewood, Colo.: Libraries Unlimited.

13.

Book Industry Communication. “E4libraries category headings - adult non-fiction and adult fiction." [online]. [cited 2012.10.20]. <http://www.bic.org.uk/51/E4libraries-Subject-Category-Headings/>.

14.

Book Industry Communication. “BIC Subject Categories and Qualifiers 2.1." [online]. [cited 2012.10.20]. <http://editeur.dyndns.org/bic_categories>.

15.

BISG. 2012. “Differences between the 2011 edition and the 2012 edition.” [online]. [cited 2012.11.29]. <http://www.bisg.org/docs/Index%20of%20Changes%20from%202011%20to%202012.pdf>.

16.

Buchanan, Brian. 1979. Theory of library classification. 정필모, 오동근 역. 1989. ..文獻分類理論... 서울: 구미무역.

17.

Envirosell Final Report for the Metropolitan Library System. April 29, 2008. [online]. [cited 2012.12.20]. <http://www.mls.lib.il.us/consulting/pdf/EnvirosellFinalReport.pdf>.

18.

Fister, Barbara. 2009. “The Dewey Dilemma.” Library Journal, 134(16): 22-25.

19.

Hopkins, Sarah. 2007. “Decimating Dewey: introducing a bookshop arrangement for shelvingthe nonfiction collection.” Australian Public Libraries and Information Services. [online]. [cited 2012.9.25]. <http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Decimating+Dewey%3A+introducing+a+bookshop+arra ngement+for+shelving+the...-a0160228826>.

20.

Hopkins, Sarah. 2012. “re: a question about your classification." 전자우편. 2012.12.6.

21.

Hosseini-Ara, Moe et al. 2012. “Customer-centred literature management system." 2012. 9.20. United States Patent application publication.

22.

Hosseini-Ara, Moe. 2012. “Re: about C3 classification scheme." 전자우편. 2012.10.17.

23.

Kumar, Krishan. 1981. Theory of classification. 2nd Rev. ed. Vikas publishing house Pvt Limited.

24.

Maltby, Arthur. 1972. “Classification-Logic, Limits, Levels." In Classification in the 1970's: A Discussion of Development and Prospects for the Major Schemes. Hamden, Conn., Linnet Books. Hyman, Richard J. 1980. Shelf classification research: past, present, future? Occasional papers. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Graduate School of Library Science ; no.146. p.21에서 재인용. [online]. [cited 2012.12.11]. <http://hdl.handle.net/2142/3952>.

25.

Maltby, Arthur. 1978. Sayers' manual of classification for librarians. London: The Trinity Press.

26.

McGrath, Maureen. 2011. “To Dewey or Not to Dewey: Libraries Go Dewey-Free." Journal of the Library Administration and Management Section. New York Library Association; Spring 2010-2011, 7(2): 29-33. [online]. [cited 2012.9.18]. <http://www.infodocket.com/2011/04/27/3132/>.

27.

Milton, Ian S. 1986. Changing faces: a practical guide to reader interest categorisation and library facelifts. Wheathampstead, St. Albans, England: Branch and Mobile Libraries Group. Baker, Sharon L. and Karen L. Wallace. 2002. The responsive public library how to develop and market a winning collection. 2nd ed. Englewood, Colo.: Libraries Unlimited. pp.290-291에 서 재인용.

28.

Ørvig, Mary. 1955. “The reader interest arrangement, an American shelving system with a future.” Libri, 5(3): 223-232.

29.

Rutzen, Ruth. 1959. A classification for the reader. In F. T. Eaton & D. E. Strout (eds). 1959. The role of classification in the modern American library: papers presented at an institute conducted by the University of Illinois Graduate School of Library Science, November 1-4, 1959. Urbana, Il: Graduate School of Library Science: 53-61. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. [online]. [cited 2012.1.24].<http://www.ideals.illinois.edu/handle/2142/1477>.

30.

Varscsak, Susan. 2012a. “Dewey free system." 전자우편. 2012.11.10.

31.

Varscsak, Susan. 2012b. “re: Some extra questions about your classification." 전자우편. 2012. 12.8.

32.

Wisser, Katherine M. 2009. The organization of knowledge and bibliographic classification in nineteenth-century America. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Information Science in the School of Information and Library Science.

33.

Young, Heartsill. 1983. The ALA glossary of library and information science. Chicago: American Library Association.

바로가기메뉴

논문 상세

Vol.47 No.1

주제어기반 분류의 특성 분석 - 범주화 및 분류체계의 측면을 중심으로 -

An Analysis of the Characteristics of the Subject-based Classification System

초록

Abstract

참고문헌

한국문헌정보학회지