바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

E-book Lending Service in Public Libraries: Issues and Possible Countermeasures

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science / Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2014, v.48 no.3, pp.113-135
https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2014.48.3.113

  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to investigate the current situation of national and international e-book ecosystem, reveal a conflict and suggest the improvement strategies regarding e-book lending service in public libraries. For this, an extensive research was conducted concerning overall e-book issues and reveled the criteria for each sectors. The relationship and different view between publishing and library sector were presented. Then, the five public library e-book lending principles, developed by foreign national or international library associations, were analyzed. The seven main principles were derived and mapped to the current practice of publishers. As a result, the possible countermeasures of the Korean public library were suggested, particularly in terms of the mission of public library, development a standardized lending model, and the revision of law.

keywords
E-book, Electronic Book, Lending, Library, Public Library, Publisher, 전자책, 대출, 도서관, 공공도서관, 출판계

Reference

1.

구모니카. 2011. 전자책 도서관 유통 정책 왜 필요한가! 전자도서관 서비스 정책에 관한 연구. 한국출판컨텐츠 전문위원 칼럼. [online] [cited 2012. 5. 4.]<http://e-kpc.tistory.com/category/전문위원%20컬럼>

2.

구모니카. 2014. 공공적 차원에서 B to B 전자도서관 서비스의 정책 기술 홍보 인프라 구축필요: 전자도서관 생태계 조성의 주체로서 도서관의 능동적 대처 제안. 전자출판 활성화를 위한토론회집 , 33-38.

3.

국립중앙도서관 도서관연구소. 2007. 도서관 정책 자료. “일본 문부과학성 ‘주요 외국 공공도서관실태조사 분석-①, ②.’” 지금 도서관에서는 , 3~4호. 2007. 10. 18~11. 6. [online] [cited 2014.6. 18.] <http://www.nl.go.kr/krili/webzine/pdf/policy_1018.pdf><http://www.nl.go.kr/krili/webzine/1031.html>

4.

국립중앙도서관 도서관연구소. 2011. 자치단체단위 공공도서관 전자자료 공동서비스 기본모형연구 . 서울: 국립중앙도서관 도서관연구소.

5.

김찬동. 2014. 전자책 공공 수요 활성화를 위한 과제 및 법률 제언. 전자출판 활성화를 위한 토론회집 , 51-53.

6.

류영호, 서정호, 이경훈, 현정환. 2012. 전자출판의 비즈니스 모델은 있는가. 전자책 전문가 좌담. 기획회의 , 331: 18-50.

7.

류영호. 2013a. 디지털 시대, 도서관의 변화와 디지털 아카이빙. 기획회의 , 345: 66-73.

8.

류영호. 2013b. DRM의 의미와 DRM free에 대한 논쟁. 기획회의 , 347: 60-66.

9.

문화체육관광부. 2014. 출판분야 표준계약서 해설. [online] [cited 2014. 6. 15.]<http://www.mcst.go.kr/web/s_notice/press/pressView.jsp?pSeq=13570>

10.

송이. 2012. 대학도서관 전자책 장서개발 지침 개발에 관한 연구 . 석사학위논문, 이화여자대학교문헌정보학과.

11.

양지열. 2012. 법은 ‘알아서’ 해주지 않는다 - 도서관 전자책 서비스의 법적 문제점. 기획회의 , 330: 42-45.

12.

오지은. 2014. 공공도서관의 전자책 이용에 대한 발전적 전략 모색에 관한 공공도서관의 입장. 전자출판 활성화를 위한 토론회집 , 49-50.

13.

이용훈, 박상미. 2013. 공공도서관에서의 전자책 서비스 현황과 개선방안 연구: 서울특별시 사례를중심으로. 한국도서관 정보학회 2013년도 하계 학술발표대회 발표자료 , 69-81.

14.

이지연. 2012. 디지털 정보환경에서의 전자출판 산업과 도서관의 협력관계 모색. 전자출판의 진화, 도서관의 미래를 전망하다 . 2012 독서의 해 기념 심포지엄 II 발표자료, 45-60. 서울: 국립중앙도서관.

15.

이지연. 2014. 공공도서관의 전자책 이용에 대한 발전적 전략 모색. 전자출판 활성화를 위한 토론회 발표자료 , 3-24.

16.

정종호. 2012. 도서관의 변화가 가져온 것들 - 도서관 전자책 서비스의 현황과 이슈. 기획회의 , 330: 37-41.

17.

정형선. 2012. B2B 정책, 무엇이 문제인가 - 쟁점과 현안, 문제점과 해결방안을 중심으로. 기획회의 , 330: 32-36.

18.

한국도서관협회 한국도서관기준특별위원회 편. 2013. 2013년판 한국도서관기준 . 서울: 한국도서관협회.

19.

한국출판인회의. 2010. 출판사를 위한 전자책 가이드북: 전자책에 대해 출판사가 꼭 알아야 할55가지 . 서울: 한국출판인회의.

20.

ALA. 2012a. “An Open Letter to America’s Publishers.” [online] [cited 2013. 6. 22.]<http://www.ala.org/news/2012/09/open-letter-america%E2%80%99s-publishers-ala-pres ident-maureen-sullivan>

21.

ALA. 2012b. “E-BOOK business models for public libraries.” [online] [cited 2013. 6. 20.]<http://connect.ala.org/files/80755/EbookBusinessModelsPublicLibs.pdf>

22.

ALA. 2013. “EBook business models: a scorecard for public libraries.” [online] [cited 2013.12. 4.]<0http://www.districtdispatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Ebook_Scorecard.pdf>

23.

ALIA. 2013. “ALIA position statement on ebooks and elending.” [online] [cited 2013. 11. 15.]<https://www.alia.org.au/sites/default/files/documents/advocacy/ALIAebooksandelendingpos ition130522.pdf>

24.

Besen, Stanley M. and Kirby, Sheila Nataraj. 2012. “E-books and libraries: an economic perspective: report to the American Library Association.” [online] [cited 2013. 9. 24.]<http://www.ala.org/offices/sites/ala.org.offices/files/content/oitp/publications/booksstudi es/ebooks_libraries_economic_perspective.pdf>

25.

BICC. 2013. Book Industry Collaborative Council final report. [online] [cited 2013. 12. 10.]<http://www.senatorkimcarr.com/uploads/1/8/8/8/18881120/book_industry_collaborative_council_final_report_2013.pdf>

26.

Bosman, Julie. 2011. “Kindle Connects to Library E-Books.” New York Times, September 21, 2011. [online] [cited 2013. 6. 2.]<http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/22/books/amazons-kindle-to-make-library-e-books-a vailable.html?ref=arts>

27.

Colomb, Philippe, Hermann Rösch and Amélie Vallotton Preisig. 2012. “Libraries, eLending, and the Future of Public Access to Digital Content.” Prepared by Civic Agenda and presented to IFLA in The Hague. [online] [cited 2013. 5. 20.]<http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/hq/topics/e-lending/thinkpiece-on-libraries-elending.pdf>

28.

Department for Culture, Media & Sport. 2013a. “An Independent Review of E-Lending in Public Libraries in England.” [online] [cited 2013. 12. 10.]<https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/an-independent-review-of-e-lending-in-p ublic-libraries-in-england>

29.

Douglas County Libraries. 2014. “Douglas County Libraries Report Pricing Comparison as of January 3, 2014.” [online] [cited 2014. 2. 20.]<http://evoke.cvlsites.org/files/2014/04/DCL-Pricing-Comparison-4-3-14.pdf>

30.

Douglas County Libraries. 2013. “Douglas County Libraries Report: Pricing Comparison.”2013. [online] [cited 2013. 12. 23.]<http://evoke.cvlsites.org/files/2013/09/DCL-Pricing-Comparison-9-3-13.pdf>

31.

EBLIDA. 2012. “EBLIDA Key Principles on the acquisition of and access to E-books by libraries.” [online] [cited 2013. 4. 13.]<http://www.eblida.org/Special%20Events/Key-principles-acquistion-eBooks-November2012/GB_English%20Version%20Key%20Principles.pdf>

32.

EBLIDA. 2013. “The Right to E-read” campaign. [online] [cited 2013. 9. 18.]<http://www.cilip.org.uk/cilip/advocacy-campaigns-awards/advocacy-campaigns/ebooks/let-libraries-lend-ebooks>

33.

“Ebook Usage in U. S. Public Libraries.” Library Journal, 2012. [online] [cited 2013. 5. 2.]<http://www.thedigitalshift.com/research/ebook-usage-reports/public/>

34.

“Ebooks the New Normal: EBook Penetration & Use in US Public Libraries.” Library Journal, 2011. [online] [cited 2013. 12. 5.]<http://www.thedigitalshift.com/research/ebook-penetration/>

35.

FAIFE. 2013. “Comment from FAIFE-Perspective.” [online] [cited 2013. 12. 10.]<http://www.ifla.org/publications/libraries-e-lending-and-the-future-of-public-access-to digital-content>

36.

Greenfield, Jeremy. 2014. “Simon & Schuster Expands Ebook Pilot to Select U. S. Libraries and Entire Catalog.” [online] [cited 2014. 2. 21.]<http://www.digitalbookworld.com/2014/simon-schuster-expands-ebook-pilot-to-select-us-libraries-and-entire-catalog/>

37.

Hadro, Josh. 2011. “HarperCollins puts 26 loan cap on ebook circulations.” Library Journal. Feb 25, 2011. [online] [cited 2012. 11. 26.]<http://www.libraryjournal.com/lj/home/889452-264/harpercollins_puts_26_loan_cap.html.csp>

38.

Hielmcrone, Harald von, Rosa Maiello, Toby Bainton and Vincent Bonnet. 2012. “E-publishing and the challenges for libraries.” [online] [cited 2013. 5. 24.]<http://www.eblida.org/Experts%20Groups%20papers/EGIL-papers/02_EBLIDA_E-publi shing%20and%20the%20challenge%20for%20libraries_Background_information_Public_ver sion.pdf>

39.

IDATE. 2013. Report on e-book lending in libraries. [online] [cited 2013. 12. 28.]<http://ebookadvocacy.wordpress.com/tag/idate/>

40.

IFLA. 2012. IFLA E-Lending Background Paper. [online] [cited 2013. 7. 24.]<http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/clm/publications/ifla-background-paper-e-lending-en.pdf>

41.

IFLA. 2013. IFLA Principles for Library eLending. [online] [cited 2013. 11. 28.]<http://www.ifla.org/node/7418>

42.

Italie, H. 2011. “Penguin suspends library e-books, citing security.” Associated Press, November 22, 2011. [online] [cited 2012. 10. 26.]<http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iG1ZGb_Ig5QbRaNPSZMrF3wu ybDg?docId=968a399491194636bc0820bb54437fa8>

43.

Jones, Sharon, Ole Gunnar Evensen, Julia Gelfand, Glenda Lammers, Lynn Sipe and Nadia Zilper. 2012. “Key issues for e-resource collection development: a guide for libraries.” IFLA Acquisition & Collection Development Section. [online] [cited 2013. 7. 24.]<http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/acquisition-collection-development/publications/Electroni c-resource-guide.pdf>

44.

Kelley, Michael. 2012. “ALA, Authors Guild, 3M Weigh In on Penguin-OverDrive Dispute,”Library Journal, February 10, 2012. [online] [cited 2013. 6. 20.]<http://www.thedigitalshift.com/2012/02/ebooks/ala-authors-guild-3m-weigh-in-on-peng uin-overdrive-dispute/>

45.

Library Journal. 2013. Survey of Ebook Usage in U. S. Public Libraries. [online] [cited 2013.12. 29.] <http://www.thedigitalshift.com/research/>

46.

Maier, Robert C. 2014. “Big Six Publishers and Library Lending.” [online] [cited 2014. 2. 4.]<http://www.americanlibrariesmagazine.org/sites/americanlibrariesmagazine.org/files/cont ent/BigSixEbookTerms011714.pdf>

47.

National and State Libraries of Australasia (NSLA) and the Council of Australian University Librarians (CAUL). ELENDING LANDSCAPE REPORT 2014. [online] [cited 2014. 4. 6.]<https://www.alia.org.au/sites/default/files/publishing/ALIA-Elending-Landscape-Report -2014.pdf>

48.

OCLC. 2013. “The big shift: Public Library Strategies for Access to Information in Any Format.” [online] [cited 2013. 11. 14.]<http://www.oclc.org/content/dam/campaign-landing-pages/en/214936_the-big-shift.pdf>

49.

Pharo, Mollie M. and Learned Au, Maria. 2011. “E-books and the public library: the Evansville Vanderburgh Public Library experience.” Information standards quarterly, 23(2):16-20. Special Issue: Views of the ebook renaissance. [online] [cited 2013. 2. 23.]<http://www.niso.org/publications/isq/2011/v23no2/pharo/IP_Pharo_Au_EVPL_isqv23no 2.pdf>

50.

Primary Research Group. 2010. Library use of ebooks 2011 edition. [S.l. : s.n.].

51.

“Public Access to Digital Content” [online] [cited 2013. 12. 2.]<http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/hq/topics/e-lending/thinkpiece-on-libraries-elending.pdf>

52.

“Survey of Ebook Penetration & Use in U.S. Public Libraries.” Library Journal, 2010. [online] [cited 2013. 12. 5.]<http://c0003264.cdn2.cloudfiles.rackspacecloud.com/Public%20Library%20Ebook%20Repo rt_2.pdf>

53.

The LIANZA Standing Committee on Digital Content and e-Lending. 2013. LIANZA E-book Issues Paper. [online] [cited 2013. 12. 22.]<http://lianza.org.nz/sites/lianza.org.nz/files/lianza_standing_committee_on_e-content_an d_e-lending_e-book_issues_paper.pdf>

54.

The Publishers Association. 2010. “PA statement regarding our position on library e-lending.”[online] [cited 2013. 6. 4.]<http://www.publishers.org.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1555:pa-statement-regarding-our-position-on-library-e-lending&catid=80:general-news&Itemi d=1404>

55.

Vasileiou, Magdalini, Jennifer Rowley and Richard Hartleyb. 2012. “The e-book management framework: The management of e-books in academic libraries and its challenges.” Library & Information Science Research, 34: 282-291.

56.

Vinjamuri, David. 2012. The Wrong War Over eBooks: Publishers Vs. Libraries. [online][cited 2013. 2. 25.]<http://www.americanlibrariesmagazine.org/sites/americanlibrariesmagazine.org/files/conte nt/BigSixEbookTerms011714.pdf>

57.

Wischenbart, Rudiger et al. 2013. The Global ebook report. [online] [cited 2013. 11. 23.]<http://www.wischenbart.com/upload/Global-Ebook-Report2013_final03.pdf>.

58.

Woodward, Hazel. 2010. “E-books: business planning for the digital library.” in Collier, Mel ed. Business planning for digital libraries: international approaches. Leuven: Leuven University Press.

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science