Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
- P-ISSN1225-598X
- E-ISSN2982-6292
A Study on the Transition from the Library’s Copyright Compensation Regime to the Orphan Works Regime
Abstract
Thise study focuses on the direction to the revisions of copyright law in Korea, so that orphan works in libraries can be used more widely on the Internet. In particular, this study analyzes the problems of the provisions 31 and 50 in the copyright law related to the mass digitations of orphan works in libraries. This study also reviews the Directive 2012/28/EU, 3 orphan works bills in USA, and provisions related to the orphan works in The Enterprise and Regulatory Reform(ERR) Act 2013 in UK. Finally this study suggests the 3 directions to support mass digitations of orphan works in libraries. First, digitized orphan works in libraries are to be made a transmission to the public on the Internet; Second, compensation and approval fees are not required or minimized; and third, libraries have to stop the use of the orphan works if copyright owners require. If not, libraries have to negotiate with the copyright owners about the fees necessary.
- keywords
- 고아저작물, 저작권법, 도서관 보상금, 법정허락, 대량디지털화, Orphan Works, Copyright Law, Library’s Copyright Compensation, Statutory License, Mass Digitisations
Reference
노현숙. 2014. 고아저작물 이용을 위한 선결과제에 관한 비교법적 고찰. 아주법학, 7(4): 345-374.
박성호. 2010. 저작권의 역설: 저작권법의 ‘오래된 미래’를 생각한다. 저작권, 여름호: 103-117.
안효질. 2012. 권리자 미확인 저작물에 대한 관리 방안 연구 . 서울: 한국저작권위원회.
오승종. 2012. 저작권법 제2판 . 서울: 박영사.
유혜경. 2012. 도서 디지털화의 저작권법적 문제에 관한 연구: 구글 전자도서관 프로젝트를 중심으로 . 석사학위논문. 명지대학교 대학원.
유희경. 2011. 디지털도서관의 저작권 문제와 해결 방안에 관한 연구 . 석사학위논문, 연세대학교대학원.
육소영. 2011. 고아 저작물과 저작권법의 목적: 구글 도서 프로젝트에 대한 분석을 포함하여. 중앙법학, 13(1): 373-398.
이해완. 2012. 고아저작물 도서 등에 대한 확대된 집중관리제도 도입방안 . 문화체육관광부.
최진원. 2011. 권리자불명 저작물 활용 방안에 대한 비교법적 연구: 법정허락제도를 중심으로. 정보법학, 15(2): 217-254.
홍유미, 윤종민. 2012. 고아저작물 이용 활성화를 위한 확대된 집중관리제도 도입에 관한 연구. 과학기술과 법, 3(2): 189-222.
홍유미. 2013. 고아저작물 관리제도 개선방안 . 석사학위논문, 충북대학교 대학원.
황다운. 2012. 고아저작물의 이용과 보호에 관한 연구 . 석사학위논문, 인하대학교 대학원.
Alpin, Tanya. 2010. A global digital register for the preservation and access to cultural heritage:problems, challenges and possibilities. (in Copyright and Cultural Heritage: Preservation and Access to Works in a Digital World. The Lypiatts: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2010). 3-27.
ARL. 2011. Resource packet on orphan works: legal and policy issues for research libraries. [online] [cited 2014. 7. 10.]<http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/resource_orphanworks_13sept11.pdf>
Center for the Study of the Public Domain. 2005. Orphan works: analysis and proposal. [online] [cited 2014. 6. 20.]
Department for Culture, Media and Sport and Department for Business, Innovation and skills. 2009. Digital Britain. [online] [cited 2014. 5. 15.]<http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http:/www.culture.gov.uk/images/publicati ons/digitalbritain-finalreport-jun09.pdf>
Hansen, David R. et al. 2013. “Solving the orphan works problem for the united states.” Columbia Journal of Law and Arts, 37(1): 1-55.
Hargreaves, Ian. 2011. Digital opportunity: a review of intellectual property and growth. [online] [cited 2014. 6. 12.]<https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/32563/i preview-finalreport.pdf>
Intellectual Property Office. 2014. “Factsheet: orphan works licensing scheme and extended collective licensing.” [online] [cited 2014. 5. 25.]<http://www.ipo.gov.uk/orphanworks-licensing.pdf>
JISC Collections Trust. 2009. In from the cold: an assessment of the scope of ‘orphan works'and its impact on the delivery of services to the public. JISC Collections Trust. [online][cited 2014. 4. 28.] <http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/publications/infromthecoldv1.pdf>
Library Copyright Alliance. 2011. Library copyright alliance statement on copyright reform. [online] [cited 2014. 7. 22.]<http://www.arl.org/storage/documents/publications/lca_copyrightreformstatement_16ma y11.pdf>
Manuel, Kate M. 2009. The Google library project: is digitization for purposes of online indexing fair use under copyright law? Congressional Research Service. [online] [cited 2014. 6. 10.]<http://cdm16064.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/p266901coll4/id/2322>
Netanel, Neil W. 2008. Copyright's paradox. London: Oxford University Press.
Reflection Group on Bringing Europe’s Cultural Heritage Online. 2011. The New Renaissance.
Stratton, Babra. 2010. Seeking new landscapes: a rights clearance study in the context of mass digitisation of 140 books published between 1870 and 2010. [online] [cited 2014. 6. 12.]<http://www.arrow-net.eu/sites/default/files/Seeking%20New%20Landscapes.pdf>
The Authors Guild, INC., and Betty Miles, Joseph Goulden, and Jim Bouton, On behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated against Google Inc., 2013. Circuit Judge Chin, Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1088, Filed 11/14/13). [online] [cited 2014. 2. 22.]<http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/834877-google-books-ruling-on-fair-use.html>
The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. 2012. Directive 2012/28/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on certain permitted uses of orphan works. [online] [cited 2014. 5. 13.]<http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2012:299:0005:0012:EN:PDF>
Urban, Jennifer et al. 2013. Report on orphan works challenges for libraries, archives, and other memory institutions. [online] [cited 2014. 6. 15.]<http://www.cmsimpact.org/sites/default/files/documents/report_on_orphan_works_chall enges.pdf>
US Copyright Office. 2006. Report on orphan works. [online] [cited 2014. 7. 17.]<http://copyright.gov/orphan/orphan-report-full.pdf>
Walker, Robert Kirk. 2014. “Negotiating the unknown: a compulsory licensing solution to the orphan works problem.” Cardozo Law Review, 35: 983-1018.
- Downloaded
- Viewed
- 0KCI Citations
- 0WOS Citations