바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

Research Design to Evaluate an Academic Library’s Orientation Program Applying Mobile Augmented Reality

Research Design to Evaluate an Academic Library’s Orientation Program Applying Mobile Augmented Reality

한국문헌정보학회지 / 한국문헌정보학회지, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2015, v.49 no.2, pp.215-233
https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2015.49.2.215
강지혜 (Florida State University)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

Abstract

Despite the continuous efforts of academic libraries to develop various user-centered outreach programs, services and new processes, library anxiety still remains a threat to university students’ full use of academic library resources. Meanwhile, a new generation of students, called the “Net Generation,” has grown up with developed information and communication technology enter university and must be persuaded to turn to the library. To serve this new group of patrons better, libraries need to adopt new technologies. However, since an initial introduction cost and labor efforts are involved in the integration of the technology, identifying the right time for introduction and the right scope of innovation is essential but difficult. The study proposes a not-yet-well-known, novel experimental design, Regression Point Displacement (RPD), to evaluate an orientation program applying Mobile Augmented Reality (MAR) for STEM students. Since this RPD design requires only one treatment group, the model is expected to be the incomparable and rational way to evaluate the new MAR technology. In the context of an informal learning experience, the findings of the study will determine the effectiveness of an orientation employing the MAR technology.

keywords
Mobile Augmented Reality, Regression Point Displacement, Orientation Program

참고문헌

1.

Azuma, R. T. 1997. A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355-385.

2.

Boonbrahm, S., and Kaewrat, C. 2014. Bookshelf management using augmented reality.Advances in Environmental Biology: 601-604.

3.

Bostick, S. L. 1992. The development and validation of the Library Anxiety Scale. Ph.D. diss., Wayne State University, Ann Arbor. [online] [cited 2015. 4. 12.]<http://search.proquest.com/docview/304002616?accountid=4840>

4.

Brown, L. J. 2011. Trending now―reference librarians: How reference librarians work to prevent library anxiety. Journal of Library Administration, 513, 309-317. doi: 10.1080/01930826.2011.556950

5.

Carlile, H. 2007. The implications of library anxiety for academic reference services: A review of literature. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 38(2), 129-147. doi: 10.1080/00048623.2007.10721282

6.

Chen, C.-M., and Tsai, Y.-N. 2012. Interactive augmented reality system for enhancing library instruction in elementary schools. Computers & Education, 59(2), 638-652. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.001

7.

Damala, A., Cubaud, P., Bationo, A., Houlier, P., and Marchal, I. 2008. Bridging the gap between the digital and the physical: design and evaluation of a mobile augmented reality guide for the museum visit. In the Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Digital Interactive Media in Entertainment and Arts, Athens, Greece, 120-127.

8.

Gabbard, J. L., and Swan, J. E. 2008. Usability engineering for augmented reality: Employing user-based studies to inform design. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 14(3), 513-525. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2008.24

9.

Green, M., Lea, J. H., and McNair, C. L. 2014. Reality check: Augmented reality for school libraries. Teacher Librarian, 41, 28-34.

10.

Hahn, J. 2012. Mobile augmented reality applications for library services. New Library World, 113(9/10), 429-438. doi: 10.1108/03074801211273902

11.

Kwon, N. 2010. Understanding emotions to empower the Net generation. In the Proceedings of the International Conference on Libraries, Information and Society (ICoLIS2010), Petaling Jaya, Malaysia, 1-13.

12.

Layar. 2015. Layar Creator (Version 8.4). [online] [cited 2015. 4. 12.] <https://www.layar.com>

13.

Lee, K. 2012. Augmented reality in education and training. TechTrends, 56(2), 13-21. doi: 10.1007/s11528-012-0559-3

14.

Lee, S. W. 2012. An exploratory study of library anxiety in developmental education students.Community & Junior College Libraries, 18(2), 67-87. doi: 10.1080/02763915.2012.726806

15.

Linden, A., Trochim, W. M. K., and Adams, J. L. 2006. Evaluating program effectiveness using the regression point displacement design. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 29(4), 407-423. doi: 10.1177/0163278706293402

16.

Mellon, C. A. 1986. Library anxiety: A grounded theory and its development. College & Research Libraries, 47(2), 160-165.

17.

Meredith, T. 2015. Using augmented reality tools to enhance children's library services.Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 20(1), 71-77. doi: 10.1007/s10758-014-9234-4

18.

Mulch, B. E. 2014. Library orientation transformation: From paper map to augmented reality.Knowledge Quest: 50-54.

19.

Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., and Campbell, D. T. 2002. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.

20.

Shatte, A., Shatte, A., Holdsworth, J., and Lee, I. 2014. Mobile augmented reality based context-aware library management system. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(5), 2174-2185. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.09.016

21.

Spina, C. 2014. Keeping up with augmented reality. [online] [cited 2015. 4. 12.]<http://www.ala.org/acrl/publications/keeping_up_with/ar>

22.

Trochim, W. M. K., and Campbell, D. T. 1996. The regression point displacement design for evaluating community-based pilot programs and demonstration projects. Unpublished manuscript, College of Human Ecology, Cornell University, NY, USA.

23.

van Arnhem, J.-P., and Spiller, J. M. 2014. Augmented reality for discovery and instruction. Journal of Web Librarianship, 8(2), 214-230. doi: 10.1080/19322909.2014.904208

24.

van Scoyoc, A. M. 2003. Reducing library anxiety in first-year students: The impact of computer-assisted instruction and bibliographic instruction. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 42(4), 329-341. doi: 10.2307/20864059

25.

Vandegrift, M., and Varner, S. 2013. Evolving in common: Creating mutually supportive relationships between libraries and the digital humanities. Journal of Library Administration, 53(1), 67-78. doi: 10.1080/01930826.2013.756699

26.

Wyman, P., Henry, D., Knoblauch, S., and Brown, C. H. 2014. Designs for testing group-based interventions with limited numbers of social units: The dynamic wait-listed and regression point displacement designs. Prevention Science: 1-11. doi: 10.1007/s11121-014-0535-6

한국문헌정보학회지