바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1225-598X
  • E-ISSN2982-6292

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.49 No.2

Citation Share

과학기술분야 연구자의 연구데이터 공유의 영향요인에 대한 연구

A Study on the Factors Affecting Sharing of Research Data of Science and Technology Researchers

한국문헌정보학회지 / Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2015, v.49 no.2, pp.313-334
https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2015.49.2.313
김문정 (중앙대학교)
김성희 (중앙대학교)
김문정, & 김성희. (2015). 과학기술분야 연구자의 연구데이터 공유의 영향요인에 대한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 49(2), 313-334, https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2015.49.2.313

초록

본 연구에서는 과학기술분야 연구자의 연구데이터 공유에 영향을 미치는 요인간의 인과관계를 분석하기 위해 과학기술분야 연구자 198명을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하였다. 외부변수로는 인지성, 의사소통의 개방성, 신뢰성, 협력성을 설정하였으며, 연구기관이 연구데이터 공유를 위한 보상체계를 매개변수로 선정하였다. 종속변수로는 연구데이터 공유를 선정하여 이들간에 요인들이 어떻게 영향을 미치는지에 대해 구조방정식을 적용하여 분석하였다. 연구결과 인지성만이 보상체계를 통하여 연구데이터 공유에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으며 다른 요인들은 연구데이터 공유를 위한 보상체계에 통계적으로 유의미하게 영향을 미치지 않는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 보상체계는 연구데이터 공유에 통계적으로 유의미하게 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다.

keywords
연구데이터, 지식공유, 지식경영, Research Data, Knowledge Sharing, Knowledge Management

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate factors affecting the sharing of research data of science and technology researchers. Data was collected through a survey of 198 science and technology researchers. Independent variables in this study included perception, openness in communication, collaboration, and trust. Latent variable was selected as reward system and dependent variable was research data sharing. The results of analysis of structural equation modeling showed that perception were found to have a positive impact on reward system for data sharing for research. Other factors such as trust, openness in communication and collaboration were not statistically significant in their affect on reward system for data sharing. Finally, reward system was identified as the influential factor on research data sharing.

keywords
연구데이터, 지식공유, 지식경영, Research Data, Knowledge Sharing, Knowledge Management

참고문헌

1.

권태형. 2000. 지식경영과 조직성과: 지식 이전 공유 시스템에 대한 조건모형과 전략 - 무임승차문제의 사회경제적 접근방법. 한국지식경영학회, 4, 213-225.

2.

김선태, 한선화, 이태영, 김용. 2010. 과학데이터 보존 및 활용모델에 관한 연구. 한국비블리아학회지, 21(4), 81-93.

3.

김성희. 2001. 지식공유에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구. 한국기록관리학회지, 1(2), 81-100.

4.

김효근, 권희영, 정성휘. 2001. 조직의 지식경영 준비도 측정도구 개발에 관한 연구. 지식경영연구, 2(1), 45-62.

5.

마은경, 김명숙. 2005. 공공기관 내 구성원간의 지식공유에 관한 연구: 사회교환이론 관점에서. Information System review, 7(1), 195-215.

6.

박태호. 2002. 지식공유의 선행요인과 지식공유가 혁신행동에 미치는 영향. 박사학위논문. 경성대학교 대학원 경영학과.

7.

서울대학교. 2010. 서울대학교 연구윤리 지침. 서울: 서울대학교.

8.

오을임, 김구. 2004. 공무원간의 관계성이 지식공유 활성화에 미치는 영향. 지역발전연구, 9, 1-20.

9.

김지현. 2012. 대학 내 연구자들의 연구데이터 관리에 관한 연구. 한국도서관․정보학회지, 43(3), 433-455.

10.

이홍재, 차용진. 2007. 평가 및 보상이 지식창출과 공유 활동에 미치는 영향 - 중앙 행정기관을중심으로. 한국정보관리학회, 24(1), 55-74.

11.

황혜경. 2007. 학술정보유통의 새로운 패러다임 ‘오픈액세스’. 과학과 기술, 40(2), 78-81.

12.

ACRL Scholarly Communications Committee. 2007. Establishing a research agenda for scholarly communication: A call for community engagement." Association of College and Research Libraries.

13.

Amabile, T. M. 1998. How to kill creativity." Harvard Business Review, 76(5), 77-87.

14.

Andrews, Kate M., and Brian L. Delahaye. 2000. Influences on knowledge processes in organizational learning: The psychosocial filter." Journal of Management studies, 37(6), 797-810.

15.

Aroian, L. A. 1944/1947. The probability function of the product of two normally distributed variables. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18, 265-271.

16.

Baron, R. M., and Kenny, D. A. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.

17.

Blau, P. 1964. Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.

18.

Bock, G., and Kim, Y. G. 2002. Breaking the Myths of Rewards: An Exploratory Study of Attitudes about Knowledge Sharing. Information Resources Management Journal, 15(2), 14-21.

19.

Butler, J. K. 1999. Trust Expectations, Information Sharing, Climate of Trust, and Negoriation Effectiveness and Efficiency," Gruop & Organizational Management, 24(2), 217-238.

20.

Cannon-Bowers, Janis A., and Salas, Eduardo. 2001. Reflections on shared cognition. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(2), 195-202.

21.

Chakravarthy, B. S. 1997. A new strategy framework for coping with turbulence. Sloan Management Review, 38(2), 69-83.

22.

Cook, J., and Toby, W. 1980. New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non-fulfilment." Journal of occupational psychology, 53(1), 39-52.

23.

Chakravarth, G., Zaheer, A., and Zaheer, S. 1999. Knowledge Sharing in Organizations:A Field Study. Organization Science Research Workshop on Management, 327-342.

24.

Cress, U., Barquero, B., Schwan, S., and Hesse, F. W. 2007. Improving quality and quantity of contributions: Two models for promoting knowledge exchange with shared databases.Computers and Education, 49, 423-440.

25.

Crow, Raym. 2002. The case for institutional repositories: a SPARC position paper." ARL Bimonthly Report. [online] [cite 2014. 3. 2.] <http://www.sparc.arl.org/IR/IR_Guide.html>

26.

Davenport, T. H. De Long, D., and Beers, M. 1998. Successful knowledge management projects. Sloan Management Review, 39(2), 43-57.

27.

Davenport, T. H., and Volpel, S. C. 2001. The rise of knowledge towards attention management."Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(3), 22-221.

28.

DeLone, W., and McLean, E. 1992. Information Systems Success: The Quest for dependent Variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60-95.

29.

Glazer, Rashi. 1998. Measuring the Knower: TOWARDS A THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE EQUITY." California management review, 40(3).

30.

Goodman, L. A. 1960. On the exact variance of products. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 55, 708-713.

31.

Gustad, John W. 1960. The career decisions of college teachers: a report of research in the southern region. Southern Regional Education Board, 2.

32.

Hargadon, Andrew. 1998. Firms as knowledge brokers." California management review, 40(3), 209-227.

33.

Hart, Paul and Saunders, Carol. 1997. Power and trust: Critical factors in the adoption and use of electronic data interchange." Organization science, 8(10), 23-42.

34.

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., and Sinkovics, R. R. 2009. The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. New Challenges to International Marketing Advances in International Marketing, 20, 277-319.

35.

Janowicz, M., and Niels G. N. 2002. The role of trust in interorganizational learning in joint ventures. Tilburg University.

36.

Kankanhalli A., Tan, B. C. Y., and Wei, K. K. 2005. Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: An empirical investigation." MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 113-143.

37.

Keltner, Dacher. 1996. Evidence for the distinctness of embarrassment, shame, and guilt:A study of recalled antecedents and facial expressions of emotion." Cognition & Emotion, 10(2), 155-172.

38.

Krogh, Georg von. 1998. Care in knowledge creation." California Management Review, 40(3), 133-154.

39.

Lank, E. 1997. Leveraging Invisible Assets: The Human Factor." Journal of Long Range Planning, 30(3), 406-412.

40.

Liebeskind, J. P. 1996. Knowledge, strategy, and the theory of the firm." Strategic Management Journal, 17, 93-107.

41.

Lin, H. F. 2007. Effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on employee knowledge sharing intentions. Journal of Information Science, 33(2), 135-149.

42.

Lesser, E., and Prusak, L. 1999. Communication of Practice, Social Capital and Organizational Knowledge." Information Systems Review (White paper).

43.

Mohammed, S., Klimoski, R., and Rentsch, Joan R. 2000. The measurement of team mental models: We have no shared schema." Organizational Research Methods, 3(2), 123-165.

44.

Nelson, Kay M., and Jay G. Cooprider. 1996. The contribution of shared knowledge to IS group performance." MIS quarterly, 409-432.

45.

O'Dell. C., and Grayson, C. J. 1998. If Only We Knew What We Know: Identification and Transfer of Internal Best Practices." California Management Review, 40(3), 154-174.

46.

OECD. 2007. OECD Principles and Guidelines for Access to Research Data from Public Funding. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.

47.

Osterloh, M., and Frey, B. S. 2000. Motivation, knowledge transfer, and organizational forms. Organization Science, 11(5), 538-550.

48.

Ryan, R. M., and Deci, E. L. 2000. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions." Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67.

49.

Skyrme, D., and Amidon, D. 1997. The Knowledge Agenda." Journal of Knowledge Management, 1(1), 27-37.

50.

Sviokla, J. J. 1996. Knowledge workers and radically new technologies." Sloan Management Review, 37, 25-40.

51.

Tampoe, Mahen. 1993. Motivating knowledge workers-the challenge for the 1990s." Long Range Planning, 26(3), 49-55.

52.

Wasko, M., and Faraj, S. 2005. Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowldge contribution in electronic networks of practice." MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 35-57.

53.

Wiig, Karl M. 1997. Integrating intellectual capital and knowledge management." Long range planning, 30(3), 399-405.

54.

Xue, Y., Bradley, J., and Liang, H. 2011. Ream climate, empowering leadership, and Knowledge sharing." Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(2), 299-312.

한국문헌정보학회지

논문 투고 OA 정책