바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science

  • P-ISSN1225-598X
  • E-ISSN2982-6292

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.49 No.3

Citation Share

A Study on Developing a TOC-based Research Record System Model

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science / Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2015, v.49 no.3, pp.109-133
https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2015.49.3.109


& (2015). A Study on Developing a TOC-based Research Record System Model. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 49(3), 109-133, https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2015.49.3.109

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop a model of the TOC(Table of Contents)-based research record system and to comparatively analyze its usability, in order to comprehensively and systematically manage and practically use the various research records generated from the entire process of research and development. For this purpose, the templates for technical recording and the components of each item were proposed to enable technical recording based on TOC, and structured contents were designed to organically connect between these TOC technical records and existing research records. Also, a database logical schema was developed to design a database, and a test collection was constructed on the basis of research records and TOC technical records. Finally, the model of research record system was constructed by designing TOC record search system and user interface including integrated search system. Based on this model, the usability assessment was performed by comparing the existing distributed general systems with the TOC-based research record system. As a result of the comparative analysis of these two systems, the TOC-based research record system showed generally higher utilization of research records than the general systems.

keywords
Research Records, Knowledge Transfer System, Records Structuralization, Research Record System, Table of Contents, 연구기록물, 지식전수, 기록물 구조화, 연구기록물시스템, TOC

Reference

1.

김수진. 2011. 정부출연연구기관의 연구기록물 관리 개선방안에 관한 연구. 석사학위논문. 이화여자대학교 대학원.

2.

박용부. 2009. 건설기록물 분류체계 모형에 관한 연구. 박사학위논문. 연세대학교 대학원.

3.

박재학. 2005. 정부출연연구소의 기록물관리실태와 운용방안연구. 석사학위논문. 충남대학교 대학원.

4.

여상아. 2007. 과학기술분야 정부출연연구기관의 연구기록관리 개선 방안: K 연구소를 중심으로. 석사학위논문. 서울대학교 대학원.

5.

오정훈, 이응봉. 2014. 원자력분야 연구기록물의 체계 분석과 TOC 기반 구조화에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 48(2), 287-306.

6.

임진희. 2011. 연구 품질 확보를 위한 기록관리 방안 연구. 한국기록관리학회지, 11(1), 183-206.

7.

정기애, 정국환, 김창하. 2010. WBS 기반의 국책 건설사업 기록물 분류체계에 대한 연구. 정보관리연구, 41(1), 173-200.

8.

정세영. 2007. 연구개발기록물 관리체계분석 및 발전방안 연구: K 연구소를 중심으로. 석사학위논문. 충남대학교 대학원.

9.

최현옥. 2010. 공과대학 연구실 연구기록관리 표준화 방안에 관한 연구. 석사학위논문. 명지대학교 대학원.

10.

최현옥, 이혜영. 2010. 우리나라 공과대학 연구실 연구기록의 체계적 관리 방안에 관한 연구. 한국기록관리학회지, 10(1), 119-139.

11.

한국원자력연구원. 2011. 원자력기술 기록 시범사업. 대전: 한국원자력연구원. KAERI/RR-3339/2011.

12.

한국원자력연구원. 2012. 원자력기술 기록사업. 대전: 한국원자력연구원. KAERI/RR-3574/2012.

13.

행정자치부. 2005. 정부기능연계모델 로드맵. 서울: 행정자치부.

14.

Andolsen, A. A. 2007. Does Your RIM Program Need a Strategic Alignment? Information Management Journal, 41(4), 35-40.

15.

Atherton, A. 2003. Examining Clusters Formation from the ‘Bottom up': an Analysis of Four Cases in the North of England. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 21(1), 21-35.

16.

Caplan, P. 2003. Metadata Fundamentals for All librarians. Chicago: American Library Association.

17.

Huotari, M. L., and Valtonen, M. R. 2003. Emerging Themes in Finnish Archival Science and Record Management Education. Achival Science, 3(2), 117-129.

18.

International Atomic Energy Agency. 2006. Knowledge Management for Nuclear Industry Operating Organizations. Wien: International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA-TECDOC-1510.

19.

Shepherd, E., and West, V. 2003. Are ISO 15489-1, 2001 and ISAD(G) compatible? Part 1. Records Management Journal, 13(1), 9-23.

20.

Xia, J. 2007. Disciplinary Repositories in the Social Sciences. Aslib Proceedings, 59(6), 528-538.

21.

Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. [online] [cited 2014. 10. 11.] <http://dublincore.org/>

22.

Metadata Object Description Schema. [online] [cited 2014. 10. 11.]<http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/>

23.

Nordenberg, M. A. 2009. University of Pittsburgh Guidelines on Research Data Management. Birmingham: Chancellor of the University. [online] [cited 2014. 10. 11.]<http://www.provost.pitt.edu/documents/RDM_Guidelines.pdf>

24.

Roeder, J. et al. 2008. InterPARES2 Project Book: Part Three. Vancouver: InterPARES2Project. [online] [Cited 2014. 10. 11.]<http://www.interpares.org/display_file.cfm?doc=ip2_book_part_3_domain2_task_force.pdf>

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science

e-Submission OA Policy