A Study on Developing Facets for Subject Headings in Korea

주제명 표목은 키워드 검색 환경에서 정교한 주제 브라우징과 검색을 제공할 수 있는 도구이다. 본 연구의 목적은 기존 주제 접근 도구에서 적용된 다양한 패싯 유형을 분석하여, 우리나라 주제명 표목에 적용 가능한 패싯을 제안하는 것이다. 먼저, 문헌 연구에서는 지금까지 혼재된 주제와 패싯에 대한 개념을 종합적으로 고찰하고 정의하였다. 다음으로 사례 연구에서는 OCLC FAST와 PRECIS 제2판과 시소러스의 구축 지침인 『Thesaurus construction and use』, 콜론 분류법 제7판, 블리스 서지 분류법 제2판, 국제십진분류법 제3판의 패싯 유형을 분석하였다. 분석 결과를 바탕으로 우리나라 주제명 표목에 적용 가능한 22개 패싯을 제안하였다. 상위 패싯으로 토픽, 사건, 장소, 시대, 개인명, 단체명, 표제명, 형식, 장르, 언어, 인물인 11개 패싯을 정의하고, 토픽 패싯은 하위에 토픽-사물/개체와 토픽-행동, 그리고 이 두 패싯의 하위로 부분, 종류, 전체, 속성, 물질, 수혜자, 산물, 부산물, 주체 패싯을 정의하였다.

keywords: 주제 접근, 주제명 표목, 시소러스, 분류체계, 패싯, 주제관련성, 범주관련성, Subject Access, Subject Heading, Thesaurus, Classification, Facet, Aboutness, Isness

Abstract

The subject heading is an elaborate access tool for subject browsing and searching in information retrieval environment. The purpose of this study is to suggest the applicable facets to subject headings in Korea. First, the concepts of subject and the definitions of facets were investigated in the literature review. Second, six cases including OCLC's FAST, PRECIS, 『Thesaurus construction and use』, CC 7th edition, BC 2nd Edition, and UDC 3rd Edition were analyzed to focus on configuration of facets as case studies. Based on the results, twenty-two facets were proposed including Topical, Event, Geography, Chronology, Personal and Corporate Name, Title, Form, Genre, Language, and Person facets as 11 top facets. Also, Topical-Thing/Entity and Topical-Action/Status, Part, Kind, Property, Whole, Material, Patient, Product, By-Product and Agent facets as sub-facets of Topical facet.

keywords: 주제 접근, 주제명 표목, 시소러스, 분류체계, 패싯, 주제관련성, 범주관련성, Subject Access, Subject Heading, Thesaurus, Classification, Facet, Aboutness, Isness

참고문헌

김태수. 1997. 주제명표목의 구조에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 14(1), 77-105.

남태우, 유광연. 2005. 블리스(Bliss)의 서지 분류법에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 22(2), 57-85.

박지영. 2010. 시소러스를 연계한 문학류 패싯 분류체계 개발. 한국비블리아학회지, 21(3), 77-89.

백지원, 정연경. 2014. 국립중앙도서관 주제명표목표 검색 시스템 개선 방안에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 31(1), 31-51.

손대형, 김태수. 1998. 패싯분류체계를 이용한 시소러스작성에 관한 연구. 한국정보관리학회 제5회 학술대회 논문집, 235-238.

유영준. 2006. 고전 용어 시소러스의 분류 체계에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 40(2), 415-434.

유영준. 2008. 신학 용어 분류를 위한 패싯 설계에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 42(3), 259-279.

이승민. 2010. 시소러스 통합을 위한 개념기반 패싯 프레임워크 구축. 한국도서관․정보학회지, 41(3), 1-22.

정연경. 2013. 한식 정보 조직을 위한 패싯 구조화에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 47(1), 15-37.

10.

황순희, 윤애선. 2005. 의미적 준거의 세목화를 고려한 과학기술 분야 시소러스 구축. 한국어의미학, 18, 99-124.

11.

Aitchison, J., Gilchrist, A., and Bawden, D. 2000. Thesaurus Construction and Use: A Practical Manual. Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers.

12.

Anderson, J. D., and Hofmann, M. A. 2006. A Fully Faceted Syntax for Library of Congress Subject Headings. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 43(1), 7-38.

13.

Austin, D. 1984. PRECIS: A Manual of Concept Analysis and Subject Indexing. London:The British Library.

14.

Beghtol, C. 1995. ‘Facets’ as Interdisciplinary Undiscovered Public Knowledge: S. R. Ranganathan in India and L. Guttman in Israel. Journal of Documentation, 51(3), 194-224.

15.

Broughton, V. 2001. Faceted Classification as a Basis for Knowledge Organization in a Digital Environment: The Bliss Bibliographic Classification as a Model for Vocabulary Management and the Creation of Multidimensional Knowledge Structures. The New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 7(1), 67-102.

16.

Broughton, V. 2006. The Need for a Faceted Classification as the Basis of All Methods of Information Retrieval. Aslib Proceedings, 58(1/2), 49-72.

17.

Broughton, V. 2010. Concepts and Terms in the Faceted Classification: The Case of UDC.Knowledge Organization, 37(4), 270-279.

18.

British Standards Institution. 2005. Universal Decimal Classification: Standard Edition. London:British Standards Institution.

19.

Cathleen, W. 1989. Faceted Classification in the Art and Architecture Thesaurus. Art Documentation, Winter: 175-177.

20.

Chan, L. M. 2005. Library of Congress Subject Headings: Principles and Application. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.

21.

Chan, L. M. et al. 2001. A Faceted Approach to Subject Data in the Dublin Core Metadata Record. Journal of Internet Cataloging, 4(1/2), 35-47.

22.

Chan, L. M., and O’Neill, E. T. 2010. FAST, Faceted Application of Subject Terminology:Principles and Applications. Santa Barbara, California: Libraries Unlimited.

23.

Chu, H. 2001. Information Representation and Retrieval in the Digital Age. 장혜란 역. 2011. 디지털 시대의 정보 표현과 검색. 서울: 한국도서관협회.

24.

Dalrymple, P. W., and Younger, J. A. 1991. From Authority Control to Informed Retrieval:Framing the Expanded Domain of Subject Access. College & Research Libraries, 52, 139-149.

25.

Franklin, R. A. 2003. Re-Inventing Subject Access for the Semantic Web. Online Information Review, 27(2), 94-101.

26.

International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. 2011. Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data: A Conceptual Model. Hague, Netherlands: International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. [online] [cited 2014. 7. 30.]<http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/classification-and-indexing/functional-requirements-for-s ubject-authority-data/frsad-final-report.pdf>

27.

Jin, Q. 2008. Is FAST the Right Direction For a New System of Subject Cataloging and Metadata? Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 45(3), 91-110.

28.

Langridege, D. W. 1989. Subject Analysis: Principles and Procedures. London: Bowker-Saur Ltd.

29.

La Barre, K. 2010. Facet Analysis. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 44, 243-284.

30.

Leong, J. H. 2010. The Convergence of Metadata and Bibliographic Control?: Trends and Patterns in Addressing the Current Issues and Challenges of Providing Subject Access.Knowledge Organization, 37(1), 29-42.

31.

Mixter, J., and Childress, E. R. 2013. FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology)Users: Summary and Case Studies. Dublin, Ohio: OCLC Research. [online] [cited 2014. 8. 20.]<http://oclc.org/content/dam/research/publications/library/2013/2013-04.pdf>

32.

O’Neill, E. T., and Chan, L. M. 2003. FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology), A Simplified Vocabulary Based on the Library of Congress Subject Headings. IFLA Journal, 29, 6-12.

33.

Pettee, J. 1946. Subject Headings: The History and Theory of the Alphabetical Subject Approach to Books. New York: H. W. Wilson Company.

34.

Raju, A. A. N. 2007. Universal Decimal Classification (IME-1993) (Theory and Practice), A Self Instructional Manual. New Delhi: Ess Ess Publications.

35.

Ranganathan, S. R. 1959. Elements of Library Classification. London: Association of Assistant Libraries.

36.

Ranganathan, S. R. 1967. Prolegomena to Library Classification. New York: Asia Publishing House.

37.

Richmond, P. A. 1981. Introduction to PRECIS for North American Usage. Littleton, Colorado:Libraries Unlimited.

38.

Satija, M. P., and Singh, J. 2013. Colon Classification: A Requiem. Journal of Library &Information Technology, 33(4), 265-276.

39.

Spietri, L. F. 1997. The Use of Facet Analysis in Information Retrieval Thesauri: An Examination of Selected Guidelines for Thesaurus Construction. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 25(1), 21-37.

40.

Spiteri, L. F. 1999. The Essential Elements of Faceted Thesauri. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 28(4), 31-52.

41.

Svenonius, E. 2000. The Intellectual Foundation of Information Organization. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

42.

Taylor, A. G. 2004. The Organization of Information. Westport, Conn: Libraries Unlimited.

43.

Vickery, B. C. 1960. Faceted Classification: A Guide to Construction and Use of Special Schemes. London: Aslib.

44.

Walsh, J. 2011. The Use of Library of Congress Subject Headings in Digital Collections.Library Review, 60(4), 328-343.

45.

Zavalina, O. L. 2012. Subject Access: Conceptual Models, Functional Requirements, and Empirical Data. Journal of Library Metadata, 12, 140-163.

바로가기메뉴

논문 상세

Vol.49 No.4

한국 주제명 표목의 패싯 유형 개발에 관한 연구

A Study on Developing Facets for Subject Headings in Korea

초록

Abstract

참고문헌

한국문헌정보학회지