바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.50 No.1
Citation Share

Toward iSchools: from the Perspective of the 5Cs

Toward iSchools: from the Perspective of the 5Cs

한국문헌정보학회지 / Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2016, v.50 no.1, pp.313-330
https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2016.50.1.313
이명호 (상명대학교)
이명호. (2016). Toward iSchools: from the Perspective of the 5Cs. 한국문헌정보학회지, 50(1), 313-330, https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2016.50.1.313
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수
PDF 다운로드

Abstract

A coalition of information schools, called the iSchools Organization, was established to increase the visibility of library and information science and to cope with the new demands of the digital age. As of 2015, sixty-five schools from many different countries have joined the iSchools Organization. While some other schools are interested in adopting iSchools, there are still some issues that need to be considered before adopting the iSchool charter. This paper presents those issues from the perspectives of the 5C groups: curriculum, competencies, convergence, collaboration, and consensus. A survey was conducted to investigate some aspects of the 5Cs. This study identifies five iSchool-related issues - 5Cs. Providing perspectives in the areas of the 5Cs will be useful to establish stronger iSchools. These five Cs will resolve information problems that we are facing, prepare students or any organizations for the digital age, give students digital service skills, and train future data scientists. This paper represents practical guidelines to build a strong iSchool. With the success of iSchools, societies see us as more than the traditional librarian.

keywords
Digital Age, Data Scientist, iSchool, Library and Information Science, Curriculum, Convergence, Competency, Collaboration, Consensus

참고문헌

1.

Bias, R. G., Marty, P. F., and Douglas, I. 2012. Usability/User-Centered Design in the iSchools: Justifying a Teaching Philosophy. Journals of Education for Library and Information Science, 53(4), 274-289.

2.

Carter, C. 2011. Master’s Students in an Information Studies Program Enter the Program with Excitement and Leave with Concerns about Professional Preparation for Their Chosen Fields. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 6(4), 140.

3.

Chu, H. 2012. iSchools and Non-iSchools in the USA: An Examination of Their Master's Programs. Education for information, 29(1), 1-17.

4.

Cox, R. J. et al. 2012. Assessing iSchools. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 53(4), 303-316.

5.

Craig, B. 2011. The Past May Be the Prologue: History's Place in the Future of the Information Professions. Libraries & the Cultural Record, 46(2), 206.

6.

Diaz, P., Giaccardi, E., and Aedo, I. 2011. Rethinking Education in a Changing World:Toward a Curriculum for Digital Living. Interactions, 18(4), 64-68.

7.

Dillon, A. 2012. What It Means to Be an iSchool. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 53(4), 267-273.

8.

Drexel. 2013. The iField. [online] [cited 2015. 3. 2.] <http://www.ischool.drexel.edu/CS>

9.

Wikipedia. 2015. Facebook. CA: Wikimedia Foundation. [online] [cited 2015. 4. 2.]<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook>

10.

Finlay, C. 2012. LIS Dissertation Titles and Abstracts (1930-2009): Where Have All the Library Gone? The library quarterly, 82(1), 29-46.

11.

Gartner. 2013. Gartner Identifies the Top 10 Strategic Technology Trends for 2013. [online][cited 2015. 3. 23.] <http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/2209615>

12.

Groth, D. P., and MacKie-Mason, J. K. 2010. Why an Informatics Degree? Commun. ACM, 53(2), 26-28.

13.

Hahn, T., and Lester, J. 2012. Faculty Needs and Preferences for Professional Development.Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 53(2), 82.

14.

Harvey, R. 2011. Losing the Quality Battle in Australian Education for Librarianship. The Australian library journal, 60(4), 346.

15.

Hilbert, M., and López, P. 2011. The World’s Technological Capacity to Store, Communicate, and Compute Information. Science, 332(6025), 60-65.

16.

iSchool. 2013. iSchools Organization. [online] [cited 2015. 3. 12.] <http://ischools.org/>

17.

Kirsh, D. 2000. A Few Thoughts on Cognitive Overload. Paris: Intellectica. [online] [cited 2015. 3. 12.] <http://icl-server.ucsd.edu/~kirsh/Articles/Overload/published.html>

18.

Laney, D. 2013. Big Data: Gartner Blog Network. [online] [cited 2015. 4. 2.]<http://blogs.gartner.com/doug-laney/tag/big-data/>

19.

Larsen, R. L. 2010. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science. Abingdon, OX: Taylor & Francis., s.v. iScools.

20.

Laura, G. M. 2012. Big Data: A Big Opportunity for Librarians. Online, 36(5), 30.

21.

Maata, S. 2008. Jobs and Pay Both Up: Healthy Outlook but More Part-Time Positions and Longer Job Searches. Library Journal, 133(17), 30-38.

22.

Markey, K. 2004. Current Educational Trends in the Information and Library Science Curriculum. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 45(4), 317-339.

23.

Miniwatts Marketing Group. 2013. World Internet Usage And Population Statistics. Bogota:Miniwatts Marketing Group. [online] [cited 2015. 2. 2.]<http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm>

24.

Noh, Y. H. 2012. A Study of the Curriculum Operating Model and Standard Courses for Library & Information Science in Korea. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 46(2), 55-82.

25.

Østerlund, C. 2015. CAS in Data Science. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University. [online] [cited 2015. 2. 12.] <https://ischool.syr.edu/academics/graduate/cas/cas-data-science/>

26.

San Jose State University. 2014. Emerging Career Trends for Information Professionals:A Snapshot of Job Titles in Summer 2014. San Jose, CA: San Jose State University. [online][cited 2016. 2. 3.]<http://ischool.sjsu.edu/about/publications/emerging-career-trends-information-professionals-snapshot-job-titles>

27.

Smith, J. 2012. The Best And Worst Master's Degrees For Jobs. Jersey City, NJ: Forbes. [online] [cited 2015. 2. 13.]<http://www.forbes.com/sites/jacquelynsmith/2012/06/08/the-best-and-worst-masters-degreesfor-jobs-2/2/#23f97db9487a>

28.

UC Berkely School of Information. 2013. Training Tomorrow's Technology Leaders. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley School of Information. [online] [cited 2015. 3. 2.]<http://www.ischool.berkeley.edu/programs/mims>

29.

UIUC. 2013. Specialization in Data Curation. Champaign, IL: Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois. [online] [cited 2015. 4. 12.]<http://www.lis.illinois.edu/academics/programs/specializations/data_curation>

30.

UNC. 2013. Data Curation. Chapel Hill, NC: School of Information and Library Science, University of North Carolina. [online] [cited 2015. 2. 22.]<http://sils.unc.edu/programs/graduate/post-masters-certificates/data-curation>

31.

Wiggins, A., and Sawyer, S. 2012. Intellectual Diversity and the Faculty Composition of iSchools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(1):8-21.

32.

Willmer, A. 2013. iAffiliates Program. Seattle, WA: Information School, University of Washington [online] [cited 2015. 5. 2.] <http://ischool.uw.edu/iaffiliates>

33.

Wu, D. 2012. The State of iSchools: An Analysis of Academic Research and Graduate Education. Journal of Information Science, 38(1), 15-36.

34.

Wurman, R. S. 1989. Information Anxiety. New York: Doubleday.

한국문헌정보학회지

논문 투고 OA 정책