-검정.jpg){kind=logo}
- 권한신청
- P-ISSN1225-598X
- E-ISSN2982-6292
사이버스칼러쉽 환경에서의 융복합 연구 촉진을 위한 인문학 분야 학술 커뮤니케이션 특성 파악에 관한 연구 - 역사학 분야를 중심으로 -
Exploratory Study of Characterizing Scholarly Communication Patterns in Humanities for Facilitating Consilience in Cyberscholarship Environment: Based on Historians’ Research Activities
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
초록
이 연구에서는 사이버스칼러쉽 환경이 실제 국내 인문학 연구활동에서 발생하는 다양한 활동에 어떠한 영향을 주었는지를 다면적이고 심층적으로 살펴보고자 하였다. 이를 위하여 실제 인문학 연구자를 대상으로 심층인터뷰를 실시하고, 연구 결과물인 학술 문헌 내 내용각주를 사용하여 다각적으로 분석하였다. 심층 면접 분석 결과 국내 인문학 연구 과정은 “기본 지식습득, 연구 및 논문쓰기(‘연구 아이디어 생성-관련 연구 파악-연구 데이터 획득-논리 구조화’의 순환 구조와 논문쓰기), 논문투고 및 출판”의 단계로 파악되었으며 연구 및 논문쓰기 단계를 구성하는 세부 단계의 순환구조를 확인하였다. 그리고 각 단계별로 학술 커뮤니케이션의 목표와 이를 달성하기 위한 도구/정보원/방법이 공식 및 비공식 학술 커뮤니케이션을 포함하여 다양하며, 특히 연구 데이터와 관련 연구 파악 단계에서 사이버스칼러쉽 관련 요소가 직접적으로 영향을 주고 있음을 확인하였다. 분석 결과와 관련 전문가 의견 수렴을 기반으로 할 때, 인문학자들이 인지하는 공동연구의 형태를 인정하고 이를 활성화할 수 있도록 지원, 데이터의 디지털화와 데이터 이용을 공유할 수 있도록 지원, 아키비스트의 적극 활용, 인문학 연구자들의 다양한 학술 커뮤니케이션 기반을 마련하고 제공하는 것이 인문학 기반 융복합연구 촉진을 위해 필요할 것으로 보인다.
- keywords
- Information Seeking Behavior, Digital Humanities, Cyberscholarship, Sense-making Theory, Archivist, 정보이용자연구, 디지털 인문학, 사이버스칼러쉽, 의미형성모델, 아키비스트
Abstract
Digitalized data and literature in scholarly community has developed the concept of digital humanities and cyberscholarship which indicate the characteristics of a new aspect and approach in scholarly activities with digitalized resources or new media. This study was performed in order to identify the changes in national research activities of art and humanities by using a multi-modal approach. The combined methodology of in-depth interview and content analysis on publishing and citing behaviors in literature was executed. The steps of research process is identified as a non-linear combination of 3 parts: developing research idea, developing the research idea to write, and submitting manuscript to publish. Prominent implementations of cyberscholarship were found in the 2nd step for accessing and using research data and literatures. Understanding the characteristics of scholar communication using cyberscholarhip factors in humanities for interdisciplinarity, sophisticating the environment of cyberscholarhip for data sharing, investing and developing archivist and archives, and providing a various platform for accelerating scholarly communication were derived by the panel discussion for developing interdisciplinary research for humanities.
- keywords
- Information Seeking Behavior, Digital Humanities, Cyberscholarship, Sense-making Theory, Archivist, 정보이용자연구, 디지털 인문학, 사이버스칼러쉽, 의미형성모델, 아키비스트
참고문헌
권나현, 이정연, 정은경. 2012. 과학기술분야 R&D 전주기 연구: 국내 생명 및 나노과학기술 연구자를 중심으로. 한국문헌정보학회지, 46(3), 103-131.
이정연, 정은경, 권나현. 2012. 과학기술분야 연구활동 단계별 문제상황 극복을 위한 정보행동 연구. 정보관리학회지, 29(3), 99-122.
한상완. 2000. 디지털시대의 정보조사제공학. 서울: 구미무역.
Arms, W. Y. 2008. Cyberscholarship: High Performance Computing Meets Digital Libraries.Journal of Electronic Publishing, 11(1). [online] [cited 2015. 12. 30.]<http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0011.103>
Arms, W. Y., and Larsen, R. L. 2007. The Future of Scholarly Communication: Building the Infrastructure for Cyberscholarship. In Report of the NSF/JISC Workshop on Scholarly Information Repositories, April 17-19, 2007, Arizona: 1-31.
Barrett, A. 2005. The Information-Seeking Habits of Graduate Student Researchers in the Humanities. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 31(4), 324-331.
Buchanan, G. et al. 2005. Information Seeking by Humanities Scholars. Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3652, 218-229.
Burdick, A. et al. 2012. Digital Humanities. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Case, D. O. 2010. Looking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs, and Behavior. 2nd ed. London: Emerald Group Publishing.
Dalton, M. S., and Charnigo, L. 2004. Historians and Their Information Sources. College & Research Libraries, 65(5), 400-425.
Dervin, B. 1983. An Overview of Sense-Making Research: Concepts, Methods and Results. May, 1983, Dalls, TX. [online] [cited 2015. 12. 30.] <http://goo.gl/GAKzEZ>
Dervin, B. 1998. Sense-Making Theory and Practice: An Overview of User Interests in Knowledge Seeking and Use. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2(2), 36-46.
Dervin, B., Foreman-Wernet, L., and Lauterbach, E. 2003. Sense-Making Methodology Reader:Selected Writings of Brenda Dervin. New York: Hampton Press.
Drummond, R., and Wartho, R. 2009. RIMS: The Research Impact Measurement Service at the University of New South Wales. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 40(2):76-87.
Foster, A. 2004. Nonlinear Model of Information Seeking Behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(3), 228-237.
Gold, M. K. ed. 2012. Debates in the Digital Humanities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Jankowski, N. W. 2007. Exploring E-Science: An Introduction. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(2), 549-562.
King, D. W., and Tenopir, C. 2001. Using and Reading Scholarly Literature. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 34, 423-477.
Larkin, C. 2010. Looking to the Future While Learning from the Past: Information Seeking in the Visual Arts. Art Documentation, 29(1), 49-60.
Larsen, R. L. 2008. On the Threshold of Cyberscholarship. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 11(1). [online] <http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0011.102>
Larsen, R. L. 2012. The Emergence of Cyberscholarship. In Proceedings of the International Symposium Celebrating the 60th Anniversary of the National Assembly Library of Korea, February 21, 2012, Seoul: National Assembly Library.
Pontille, D., and Torny, D. 2010. The Controversial Policies of Journal Ratings: Evaluating Social Sciences and Humanities. Research Evaluation, 19(5), 347-360.
Rose, T. 2002. Technology's Impact on the Information-seeking Behavior of Art Historians.Art Documentation, 21(2), 35-42.
Rhee, H. L. 2010. Unique Qualities of Historians' Information-seeking Behavior in Historical Research. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 47(1), 1-2.
Savolainen, R. 1993. The Sense-making Theory: Reviewing the Interests of a User-centered Approach to Information Seeking and Use. Information Processing & Management, 29(1):13-28.
UNESCO. 1971. UNISIST Study Report on the Feasibility of a World Science Information System. Paris: UNESCO. [online] [cited 2015. 12. 30.]<http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0006/000648/064862eo.pdf>
Van de Sompel, H. et al. 2004. Rethinking Scholarly Communication. D-Lib Magazine, 10(9). [online] [cited 2015. 12. 30.]<http://webdoc.sub.gwdg.de/edoc/aw/d-lib/dlib/september04/vandesompel/09vandesomp el.html>
WeftQDA. [online] [cited 2015. 12. 30] <http://www.pressure.to/qda/>
White, H. D. et al. 2009. Libcitations: A Measure for Comparative Assessment of Book Publications in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(6), 1083-1096.
Wiktionary. 2015. San Francisco, CA: Wikimedia Foundation., s.v. cyberscholarship. [online][cited 2015. 12. 30.] <https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/cyberscholarship>
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
- 0KCI 피인용수
- 0WOS 피인용수