Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
- Apply for Authority
- P-ISSN1225-598X
- E-ISSN2982-6292
Considering Core Ideas of ACRL Information Literacy ‘Framework(2015)’
- Downloaded
- Viewed
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze the ‘Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education’ filed by the ACRL(Association of College and Research Libraries) Board on February 2, 2015 and adopted on January 11, 2016. Six concepts central to information literacy in Framework and four main theories or models (i.e., threshold concepts, metaliteracy, Backward Design, and Liminal Space) underpinning the Framework were analyzed. The Framework provides conceptual or descriptive approach. In addition, the Framework is not designed to be implemented in a single information literacy session in a student’s academic career. Instead, it is intended to be systematically integrated into the student’s academic program at variety of levels. This study recommends curricular development and assessment methods supporting Framework as a further study.
- keywords
- information literacy, ACRL Framework, threshold concepts, meta-literacy, Liminal Space, Backward Design, 정보리터러시, ACRL의 프레임워크, 문지방 개념, 메타 리터러시, 한계 공간, 백워드 디자인
Reference
박은정. 2014. 학습경험을 바탕으로 학생들이 제시하는 고등학교 화학교과 내의 어려운 개념과문지방개념 분석 연구. 대한화학회지, 58(1), 126-139.
이병기. 2011. 백워드 설계 모형을 적용한 ｢도서관과 정보생활｣ 교과의 교수설계에 관한 연구. 한국비블리아학회지, 22(3), 5-24.
이영호, 구덕회. 2015. 백워드 설계 모형을 적용한 소프트웨어 교과의 교수설계에 관한 연구. 정보교육학회논문지, 19(4), 409-418.
최재황. 2015. 영국 SCONUL의 정보리터러시 기준 분석. 한국문헌정보학회지, 49(2), 5-26.
ACRL. 2000. Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education. Chicago, IL: Association of College & Research Libraries. [online] [cited 2016. 5. 30.]<http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/informationliteracycompetency>
ACRL. 2012. Task Force Recommendations. Chicago, IL: Association of College & Research Libraries. [online] [cited 2016. 1. 7.]<http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/standards/ils_recomm.pdf>
ACRL. 2014a. Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education: Draft 1, Part 1. Chicago, IL: Association of College & Research Libraries. [online] [cited 2016. 6. 19.]<http://acrl.ala.org/ilstandards/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Framework-for-IL-for-HE-Draft-1-Part-1.pdf>
ACRL. 2014b. Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education: Draft 1, Part 2. Chicago, IL: Association of College & Research Libraries. [online] [cited 2016. 6. 19.]<http://acrl.ala.org/ilstandards/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Framework-for-IL-for-HE-Draft-1-Part-2.pdf>
ACRL. 2014c. Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education: Draft 2. Chicago, IL: Association of College & Research Libraries. [online] [cited 2016. 6. 19.]<http://acrl.ala.org/ilstandards/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Framework-for-IL-for-HE-Draft-2.pdf>
ACRL. 2014d. Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education: Draft 3. Chicago, IL: Association of College & Research Libraries. [online] [cited 2016. 6. 19.]<http://acrl.ala.org/ilstandards/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Framework-for-IL-for-HE-draft-3.pdf>
ACRL. 2015. Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education: Final Document. Chicago, IL: Association of College & Research Libraries. [online] [cited 2016. 6. 19.]<http://acrl.ala.org/ilstandards/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Framework-MW15-Board-Docs.pdf>
ACRL. 2016. Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education. Chicago, IL: Association of College & Research Libraries. [online] [cited 2016. 6. 19.]<http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework>
Brunetti, K. et al. 2014. Threshold Concepts & Information Literacy: Overview & Assessment. [online] [cited 2016. 6. 22.]<http://www.ilthresholdconcepts.com/uploads/3/0/9/7/30975467/cuny_handout.pdf>
Farmer, L. 2014. How AASL Learning Standards Inform ACRL's Information Literacy Framework. In Proceedings of IFLA WLIC 2014, August 16th-22nd, 2014, Lyon: Lyon Convention Centre: 1-6. [online] [cited 2016. 7. 10.]<http://library.ifla.org/831/1/072-farmer-en.pdf>
Fister, B. 2015. The Liminal Library: Making Our Libraries Sites of Transformative Learning.In Proceedings of LILAC 2015, April 8th-10th, 2015, Tyne and Wear: Newcastle University:1-10. [online] [cited 2016. 5. 19.] <http://barbarafister.com/LiminalLibrary.pdf>
Hofer, A. R., Townsend, L. and Brunetti, K. 2012. Troublesome Concepts and Information Literacy: Investigating Threshold Concepts for IL Instruction. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 12(4), 387-405.
Jacobson, T. E. and Gibson, C. 2015. Engaging with the ACRL Framework for Information Literacy. Proceedings of Engaging with the ACRL Information Literacy Framework, March 10th, 2016, Albany, NY: University at Albany. [online] [cited 2016. 6. 20.]<https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4wphSmPeLWmNVFod0thdVEwSFU/view?usp=shar ing>
Jacobson, T. E. and Mackey, T. P. 2013. Proposing a Metaliteracy Model to Redefine Information Literacy. Communications in Information Literacy, 7(2), 84-91.
Mackey, T. P. and Jacobson, T. E. 2011. Reframing Information Literacy as a Metaliteracy.College & Research Libraries, 72(1), 62-78. [online]<http://crl.acrl.org/content/72/1/62.full.pdf>
Meyer, J. and Land, R. 2003. Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge: Linkages to Ways of Thinking and Practising within the Disciplines. Edinburgh: Enhancing Teaching-Learning Environments in Undergraduates Courses. [online] [cited 2016. 6. 3.]<http://www.etl.tla.ed.ac.uk/docs/ETLreport4.pdf>
Morgan, P. K. 2015. Pausing at the Threshold. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 15(1):183-195.
Townsend, L., Brunetti, K. and Hofer, A. R. 2011. Threshold Concepts and Information Literacy. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 11(3), 853-869.
Townsend, L. et al. 2015. What's the Matter with Threshold Concepts?. [online] [cited 2016. 6. 25.]<http://acrlog.org/2015/01/30/whats-the-matter-with-threshold-concepts>
Wiggins, G. and McTighe, J. 2004. Understanding by Design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Wilkins, L. Reconsidering Threshold Concepts: A Critical Appraisal of the ACRL Framework for Information Literacy. Proceedings of LOEX 2015 Conference, April 30th - May 2nd, 2015, Denver, Co: Hyatt Regency Denver Tech Center. [online] [cited 2016. 6. 29.]<http://www.loexconference.org/2015/sessions.html#wilkinson>
Zurkowski, P. G. 1974. The Information Service Environment: Relationships and Priorities:Related Paper No. 5. Washington D.C.: National Commission on Libraries and Information Science. [online] [cited 2016. 6. 19.] <http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED100391.pdf>
- Downloaded
- Viewed
- 0KCI Citations
- 0WOS Citations