-검정.jpg){kind=logo}
- P-ISSN1225-598X
- E-ISSN2982-6292
온라인 대중공개강좌(MOOC)를 위한 도서관 지원 서비스 모델 연구
A Study on Library Engagement and Models for Support of MOOC
초록
전 세계 수많은 대학들이 오프라인 강의를 MOOC 형태로 제작하여 온라인에 무료로 제공하고 있다. 이러한 대학의 움직임에 능동적으로 대응하기 위해 해외 대학도서관들은 자신의 역할을 재정립하고 새로운 서비스를 제공하기 시작했다. 본 연구는 체계적 문헌 고찰 방법을 통해 국외 문헌정보학 저널들에 게재된 MOOC 관련 논문들을 선정 분석하고 기존 연구의 한계와 도서관 분야의 MOOC 지원 서비스 항목들을 도출하여 향후 국내 도서관 MOOC 지원 서비스 모델을 개발하는데 있어 고려할 사항을 제안하였다. 이를 위해 2012년부터 2015년까지 최근 4년 동안의 해외 문헌정보학 저널에 게재된 연구 논문 348편 중 최종 34편을 관련 논문으로 선정하고 내용을 분석하였다. 그 결과 도서관 관련 MOOC 연구(24편)와, 문헌정보학 교육 관련 MOOC 연구(10편)로 나누어 요약 정리하였으며, 주요 MOOC 지원 서비스는 크게 5개 단계로 나눌 수 있었다. 첫 번째 MOOC 강의 디자인 단계의 저작권 처리 및 컨설팅, 콘텐츠 라이센스, 오픈 콘텐츠 홍보 및 안내 서비스와 두 번째 강의 제작 단계에서 강의 제작 및 편집 지원과 자체 사서 MOOC 콘텐츠 제작, 세 번째, 강의 운영 단계에서 강의 운영 자료 및 학습 안내 자료 제작과 수강생 지원 서비스, 네 번째로 강의 평가 단계의 강의 관련 데이터 수집 및 분석, 강의 운영 평가 서비스가 있으며 다섯 번째로 강의 재사용 단계에서 강의 콘텐츠 메타데이터 작성 및 아카이브 구축이 있다. 이러한 분석 결과를 토대로 향후 국내 도서관의 MOOC 지원 서비스 모델을 제안하고 추후 MOOC 관련 연구에 대한 이론적 기반을 제시하였다.
- keywords
- Library, MOOC, Library and Information Science, Systematic Review, Service Models, 도서관, 무크, 문헌정보학, 체계적 문헌 고찰, 서비스 모델
Abstract
Many universities are offering some of their offline courses for anyone to learn free online as an MOOC format. University libraries In response to changing university conditions, foreign university libraries are struggling to redefine their roles and provide new services. This study aimed to find the trends and models to support MOOCs in foreign libraries and Library and information science domain by conducting a systematic review of studies on foreign library and information journals which have been published from 2012 to 2015. A total of 34 out of 348 studies were included in the final analysis. This study also aimed to present the limits and the future models of MOOC support direction. The relevant articles could be identified, two criteria: 24 MOOCs studies relating to Libraries and 10 MOOCs studies related to LIS. The selected articles were summarized and analyzed yearly. The study identifies elements of library MOOC support models in 5 areas including MOOC design (copyright clearance and consulting, content licensing, open content), production support (course production, video editing, librarian MOOC production), management support (instructional design and content creation, students support), evaluation (MOOC data collection, analysis), reuse (MOOC metadata management, archive structure). Based on these findings, this study suggested the models of library MOOC support and set the theoretical fundamentals.
- keywords
- Library, MOOC, Library and Information Science, Systematic Review, Service Models, 도서관, 무크, 문헌정보학, 체계적 문헌 고찰, 서비스 모델
참고문헌
Allman, G. 2013. Keeping an Open Mind. CILIP Update, 12(6), 3.
Ariew, S. 2013. Teaching and Learning with Online Educational Videos: A Subject List of Web Resources for Educators. Choice Reviews Online, 50(12), 2135-2148. doi: 10.5860/choice.50.12.2135.
Barnes, C. 2013. Moocs: The Challenges for Academic Librarians. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 44(3), 163-175. doi: 10.1080/00048623.2013.821048.
Becker, B. W. 2013. Connecting Moocs and Library Services. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 32(2), 135-138. doi: 10.1080/01639269.2013.787383.
Bond, P., and Leibowitz, F. 2013. Moocs and Serials. Serials Review, 39(4), 258-260. doi: 10.1080/00987913.2013.10766407.
Ecclestone, M. 2013. Moocs as a Professional Development Tool for Librarians. Partnership, 8(2), 1-6. doi: 10.21083/partnership.v8i2.2797.
Frederiksen, L. 2013. Makers and Moocs. Public Services Quarterly, 9(2), 157-161. doi: 10.1080/15228959.2013.785897.
Gore, H. 2014. Massive Open Online Courses (Moocs) and Their Impact on Academic Library Services: Exploring the Issues and Challenges. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 20(1), 4-28. doi: 10.1080/13614533.2013.851609.
Green, R. 2014. Moocing the Most of Library Resources. CILIP Update, 3, 33-39.
Gulati, A. 2013. An Overview of Massive Open Online Courses (Moocs): Some Reflections.International Journal of Digital Library Services, 3(4), 37-46.
Hovious, A. 2014. Two Takes on How Massive Open Online Courses (Moocs) May Affect Librarians and Library Services: Counter Point. American Libraries, 45(5), 35.
Hoy, M. B. 2014. Moocs 101: An Introduction to Massive Open Online Courses. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 33(1), 85-91. doi: 10.1080/02763869.2014.866490.
Kaushik, A and Kumar, A. 2015. Periodical Literature on Moocs and LIS Domain. International Journal of Information Dissemination and Technology, 5(1), 37-40.
Liyanagunawardena, T. R., and Williams, S. A. 2014. Massive Open Online Courses on Health and Medicine: Review. J Med Internet Res, 16(8): e191. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3439.
Mahraj, K. 2012. Using Information Expertise to Enhance Massive Open Online Courses.Public Services Quarterly, 8(4), 359-368. doi: 10.1080/15228959.2012.730415.
Mallon, M. 2013. Moocs. Public Services Quarterly, 9(1), 46-53.
Massis, B. E. 2013. Moocs and the Library. New Library World, 114(5/6), 267-270. doi: 10.1108/03074801311326894.
McKiel, A., and Dooley, J. 2013. Changing Library Operations-Moocs Some Thoughts from Library Experience. Against the Grain, 25(6), 54-55.
Miller, W. 2013. Massive Online Open Courses (Moocs) and Your Library. Library Issues, 33(5), 1-4.
Moher, D. 2009. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses:The PRISMA Statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135.
Nisha, F., and Senthil, V. 2015. Moocs: Changing Trend Towards Open Distance Learning with Special Reference to India. DJLIT, 35(2), 82-89. doi: 10.14429/djlit.35.2.8191.
Pappano, L. Massive Open Online Courses Are Multiplying at a Rapid Pace. 2012. The New York Times. November 2nd. [online]<http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/04/education/edlife/massive-open-online-courses-aremultiplying-at-a-rapid-pace.html?_r=0.>
Pritchard, S. M. 2013. Moocs: An Opportunity for Innovation and Research. Portal:Libraries and the Academy, 13(2), 127-129. doi: 10.1353/pla.2013.0015.
Pritchard, S. M. 2014. Innovative Research in Academic Libraries: Do Editorials, Agendas, or Think Tanks Make a Difference?. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 14(2), 133-136. doi: 10.1353/pla.2014.0007.
Pujar, S., and Bansode, S. 2014. Moocs and LIS Education: A Massive Opportunity or Challenge. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 61(1), 74-78.
Smith-Cruz, S., Thistlethwaite, P., and Daniels, J. 2014. Open Scholarship for Open Education:Building the Justpublics@365 POOC. Journal of Library, 5(2), 15-28.
Steel, L. 2013. Will Moocs Change the World?. CILIP Update, 12(6), 38-39.
Stephens, M., and Jones, K. 2014. Moocs as LIS Professional Development Platforms:Evaluating and Refining SJSU's First Not-For-Credit MOOC. Journal of Education for Library & Information Science, 55(4), 345-361.
Stephens, M. 2013. Moocs for LIS Professional Development: Exploring New Transformative Learning Environments and Roles. Internet Learning, 2(2), 72-88. doi: 10.18278/il.2.2.5.
Sun, J.-Z., and Liao, S.-F. 2014. Study on the Patterns of Library Resource Construction and Services in MOOC. IJUNESST, 7(6), 85-90. doi: 10.14257/ijunesst.2014.7.6.08.
Toven-Lindsey, B., Rhoads, R. A., and Lozano, J. B. 2015. Virtually Unlimited Classrooms:Pedagogical Practices in Massive Open Online Courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 24, 1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.07.001.
Walsh, K. 2014. Massive Open Online Courses on Health and Medicine: Will They Be Sustainable?. J Med Internet Res, 16(8): e197. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3798.
Wu, K. 2013. Academic Libraries in the Age of Moocs. Reference Services Review, 41(3):576-587. doi: 10.1108/rsr-03-2013-0015.
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
- 0KCI 피인용수
- 0WOS 피인용수