바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

An Analysis on Open Access Policies on Publications Funded by Overseas Public Institutions

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science / Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2016, v.50 no.4, pp.209-229
https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2016.50.4.209




  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to analyze open access policies of overseas public funding institutions and to suggest considerations to develop policies in Korea. Policy documents, related literature researches, homepage of major public funding institutions in US, UK, China, Japan, EU have been reviewed to investigate background, components and contents of policies. As results of this research, it was found that most institutions have their mandatory policies, which beneficiaries deposit their publications resulting from publicly funded research to repositories. In addition, they have been advanced policies to expand deposit agents and objectives, to improve the repository, to reduce the embargo period.

keywords
Publicly Funded Research, Deposit, Public Access, Open Access, 공공연구기금, 학술논문, 공공기탁, 공공접근, 오픈 액세스

Reference

1.

김규환. 2014. 국내 학회의 오픈액세스 수용과 추진방식에 대한 제안. 정보관리학회지, 31(3):111-131.

2.

김유승 외. 2011. 공공 연구성과물의 공공접근을 위한 규정 및 프로세스 연구. 서울: 한국과학기술정보연구원.

3.

서태설, 허선, 노경란. 2009. 학술논문 오픈액세스를 위한 공공접근정책 방향. KISTI 지식리포트, 4. 대전: 한국과학기술정보연구원.

4.

우지숙 외. 2011. 공공 연구 성과물의 공공접근정책 연구. 서울: 한국과학기술정보연구원.

5.

정경희. 2010. 공공기금으로 작성된 논문의 오픈액세스 정책에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 27(1), 207-227.

6.

차미경. 2007. 오픈 액세스 기반 학술 커뮤니케이션을 위한 정책 개발에 관한 연구. 서울: 한국교육학술정보원.

7.

최희윤, 황혜경, 백종명. 2012. 국내 오픈액세스서비스의 이용자 만족도에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 29(1), 279-302.

8.

Archambault, E., Caruso, J. and Nicol, A. 2014. State-of-art Analysis of OA Strategies to Peer-review Publications. Nomtreal: Science-Metrix.

9.

Björk, B.-C. and Solomon, D. 2014. Article Processing Charges in OA Journals: Relationship between Price and Quality. Scientometrics, 103(2), 373-385.

10.

Committee for Economic Development (CED). 2012. The Future of Taxpayer-Funded Research:Who Will Control Access to the Results?. Washington, DC: Committee for Economic Development.

11.

European Commission (EC). 2016a. AGA-Annotated Model Grant Agreement: Version 2.1.1. Brussels: European Commission.

12.

European Commission (EC). 2016b. Background Note on Open Access to Scientific Publications and Open Research Data. Brussels: European Commission.

13.

Houghton, J. and Swan, A. 2013. Planting the Green Seeds for a Golden Harvest: Comments and Clarification on Going for Gold. D-Lib Magazine, 19(1/2), 1.

14.

Laakso, M. 2014. Green Open Access Policies of Scholarly Journal Publishers: A Study of What, When, and Where Self-archiving is Allowed. Scientometrics, 99(2), 475-494.

15.

Lewis, D. W. 2012. The Inevitability of Open Access. College and Research Libraries, 73(5):493-506.

16.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation Development (OECD). 2015. Making Open Science a Reality. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 25. Paris: OECD Publishing.

17.

Zhang, X. 2014. Development of Open Access in China: Strategies, Practices, Challenges.Insights, 27(1), 45-49.

18.

Zhang, X. 2016. Open Access in China. Proceedings of COAR Annual Meeting & General Assenbly 2016, April 12-13th, 2016, Vienna: University of Vienna: 1-31.

19.

佐藤翔. 2014. フォーラム「世界のオープンアクセス政策と日本」<報告>. カレントアウェアネス, 256: E1544.

Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science