-검정.jpg){kind=logo}
- P-ISSN1225-598X
- E-ISSN2982-6292
학술대회 논문의 참고자료 인용패턴 분석 - 정보과학 분야를 중심으로 -
A Bibliometric Analysis of Citation Patterns in Conference Papers of Information Science
초록
본 논문은 정보과학 분야를 중심으로 학술대회 논문에서 참고자료를 인용하는 패턴을 분석하고 피인용된 참고자료의 다양한 특성이 추후 그 자료를 참고한 학술대회 논문의 인용수에 어떤 영향을 끼치는지 분석하였다. 참고자료의 인용패턴에 관한 계량서지학 연구는 학술지 논문을 중심으로 활발히 이루어졌다. 하지만 점점 커지는 중요성에도 학술대회 논문을 대상으로 한 계량서지학 연구는 그 자체가 아직 초기 단계이다. 특히, 학술대회 논문에서 참고자료를 인용한 패턴이나 학술대회 논문의 인용수와 관련이 깊은 피인용 자료의 특성들을 조사하는 연구는 미비하다. 따라서 본 연구는 1,900여편의 정보과학 관련 학술대회 논문을 표본논문으로 삼고 그 표본 논문에서 참고자료가 어떻게 인용되었는지 패턴을 살펴보았다. 또, 참고자료의 다양한 특성들(참고자료의 유형 및 개수, 피인용 당시 참고자료의 인용수, 피인용 당시 참고자료의 나이, 저자의 자기인용 비율)이 표본논문과 추후 얻게 될 인용수와 어떤 연관이 있는지 조사하였다. 그 결과, 피인용 참고자료의 53%가 학술대회 논문이었고, 29%가 학술지 논문이었다. 특히, 참고자료의 14%가 학술지 논문이나 단행본이 아닌 비전형적인 참고자료의 유형이었다. 그리고 참고자료의 60% 이상이 5년 이내에 발표된 자료이고, 최신자료일수록 학술대회 논문, 웹 페이지, 기타자료의 비중이 높았다. 참고자료 중 자기 인용 비율은 1.7%로 미비했다. 마지막으로 표본논문의 인용수에 유의미한 영향을 끼치는 참고자료의 특성은 참고자료로 쓰인 학술대회 논문의 수, 기타 자료의 수, 그리고 참고자료의 평균나이였다. 즉, 학술대회 논문과 기타자료를 참고자료로 많이 사용하고 최신의 자료를 많이 참조한 표본논문일수록 많이 인용되었다.
- keywords
- Citation Analysis, References, Bibliometric Analysis, Multiple Regressions, Conference Proceedings, 참고자료, 인용패턴, 인용지수 분석, 계량서지학, 학술대회
Abstract
This paper aims to explore the citation patterns of conference papers in ‘Information Science’ discipline and to analze impacts of various cited works-related factors on future citations of conference papers. Existing bibliometric studies has investigated citation patterns and the statistical relations between a variety of bibliographic factors and the future citations of literature. However, the attentions have been focused largely on journal articles, and the bibliometric studies targeting conference papers are still in an infant stage. Therefore, this study, which is based on 1,904 conference papers in ‘Information Science’ field, examined several citation patterns and the contributions of the factors about cited works – the number of cited works, type of cited works, citation rates and ages of cited works at the time of being cited and the rate of self-citedness – to the future citation of the citing target articles. The data source of this study including the properties of target articles and cited works and citation rates of target articles was Scopus. As the results, 53% and 29% of the cited works were conference papers and journal articles, respectively. 14% of them are non-traditional types such as web pages, technical reports, patent, etc. More than 60% of the cited works were 5 years old or less. Among several factors considered in this paper, the number of conference papers and the number of non-traditional types of works are the most contributing factors on the citation rates of target articles. The recency of the cited works is also significant contributor on the citation rates of target articles. That is, the target articles citing more conference papers and non-traditonal types of works earned more citations. The target articles citing recent works also earned more citations.
- keywords
- Citation Analysis, References, Bibliometric Analysis, Multiple Regressions, Conference Proceedings, 참고자료, 인용패턴, 인용지수 분석, 계량서지학, 학술대회
참고문헌
김갑선. 2002. 참고문헌의 동시공존현상-한국 사회과학자들의 인용동기와 참고자료의 분석. 한국문헌정보학회지, 36(4), 21-47.
김미라, 이응봉. 2013. 참고문헌 분석을 통한 국방과학 연구자들의 인용행태 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 47(2), 143-159.
오세훈. 2005. 우리나라 문헌정보학 학술지 논문 및 인용문헌 분석을 통한 연구동향 연구. 정보관리학회지, 22(3), 379-408.
조인숙, 한미숙. 2007. 문헌정보학분야 연구자들의 학술지 게재논문과 인용학술지 분석 연구. 한국비블리아학회지, 18(2), 89-105.
Antoniou, G. A. et al. 2015. Bibliometric Analysis of Factors Predicting Increased Citations in the Vascular and Endovascular Literature. Annals of Vascular Surgery, 29(2), 286-292.
Barbosa, S. D. J., Silveira, M. S., and Gasparini, I. 2017. What Publications Metadata Tell Us about the Evolution of a Scientific Community: The Case of the Brazilian Human-Computer Interaction Conference Series. Scientometrics, 110(1), 275-300.
Bartneck, C., and Hu, J. 2009. Scientometric Analysis of the CHI Proceedings. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, April 04-09, 2009, Boston, MA, USA: 699-708.
Biscaro, C., and Giupponi, C. 2014. Co-Authorship and Bibliographic Coupling Network Effects on Citations." PLOS ONE, 9(6), e99502.
Bornmann, L. et al. 2012. Diversity, Value and Limitations of the Journal Impact Factor and Alternative Metrics." Rheumatology International, 32(7), 1861-1867.
Chakraborty, T. et al. 2014. Towards a Stratified Learning Approach to Predict Future Citation Counts." In Proceedings of the 14th A CM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, September 08-12, 2014, 351-360.
Cohen, J. et al. 2013. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: Routledge.
Didegah, F., and Thelwall, M. 2013. Determinants of Research Citation Impact in Nanoscience and Nanotechnology." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(5), 1055-1064.
Donner, P. 2016. Enhanced Self-citation Detection by Fuzzy Author Name Matching and Complementary Error Estimates." Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(3), 662-670.
Eckmann, M., Rocha, A., and Wainer, J. 2012. Relationship Between High-Quality Journals and Conferences in Computer Vision." Scientometrics, 90(2), 617-630.
Falagas, M. E. et al. 2013. The Impact of Article Length on the Number of Future Citations: A Bibliometric Analysis of General Medicine Journals." PLoS One, 8(2), e49476.
Franceschet, M. 2010. A Comparison of Bibliometric Indicators for Computer Science Scholars and Journals on Web of Science and Google Scholar." Scientometrics, 83(1), 243-258.
Freyne, J. et al. 2010. Relative Status of Journal and Conference Publications in Computer Science." Communications of the ACM, 53(11), 124-132.
Harzing, A.-W., and Alakangas, S. 2016. Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science:A Longitudinal and Cross-Disciplinary Comparison." Scientometrics, 106(2), 787-804.
Keith, T. Z. 2014. Multiple Regression and Beyond: An Introduction to Multiple Regression and Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Routledge.
Larivière, V., Sugimoto, C. R., and Cronin, B. 2012. A Bibliometric Chronicling of Library and Information Science's First Hundred Years." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(5), 997-1016.
Lisée, C., Larivière, V., and Archambault, É. 2008. Conference Proceedings as A Source of Scientific Information: A Bibliometric Analysis." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(11), 1776-1784.
Meho, L. I., and Yang, K. 2007. Impact of Data Sources on Citation Counts and Rankings of LIS Faculty: Web of Science Versus Scopus and Google Scholar." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2105-2125.
Montesi, M., and Owen, J. M. 2008. From Conference to Journal Publication: How Conference Papers in Software Engineering are Extended for Publication in Journals." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(5), 816-829.
Nederhof, M. J. 2006. Bibliometric Monitoring of Research Performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review." Scientometrics, 66(1), 81-100.
Onodera, N., and Yoshikane, F. 2015. Factors Affecting Citation Rates of Research Articles."Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(4), 739-764.
Sakr, S., and Alomari, M. 2012. A Decade of Database Conferences: A Look Inside the Program Committees." Scientometrics, 91(1), 173-184.
Schreiber, M. 2007. Self-Citation Corrections for the Hirsch Index." EPL (Europhysics Letters), 78(3), 30002.
Scopus. 2013. Scopus Content Coverage Guide. [online] [cited 2017. 9. 20.]<https://files.sciverse.com/documents/pdf/ContentCoverageGuide-jan-2013.pdf>
Shirakawa, N. et al. 2012. Global Competition and Technological Transition in Electrical, Electronic, Information and Communication Engineering: Quantitative Analysis of Periodicals and Conference Proceedings of the IEEE." Scientometrics, 91(3), 895-910.
Tahamtan, I., Safipour Afshar, A., and Ahamdzadeh, K. 2016. Factors Affecting Number of Citations: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature." Scientometrics, 107(3), 1195-1225.
van Wesel, M., Wyatt, S., and ten Haaf, J. 2014. What a Difference a Colon Makes: How Superficial Factors Influence Subsequent Citation." Scientometrics, 98(3), 1601-1615.
Vardi, M. Y. 2010. Revisiting the Publication Culture in Computing Research." Communications of the ACM, 53(3), 5.
Vasilescu, B. et al. 2014. How Healthy are Software Engineering Conferences?" Science of Computer Programming, 89(C), 251-272.
Vrettas, G., and Sanderson, M. 2015. Conferences Versus Journals in Computer Science."Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(12), 2674-2684.
Wainer, J., and Valle, E. 2013. What Happens to Computer Science Research after It Is Published? Tracking CS Research Lines." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(6), 1104-1111.
Wainer, J., Przibisczki de Oliveira, H., and Anido, R. 2011. Patterns of Bibliographic References in the ACM Published Papers." Information Processing & Management, 47(1), 135-142.
Waltman, L. 2016. A Review of the Literature on Citation Impact Indicators." Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 365-391.
Wuehrer, G., and Smejkal, A. 2013. The Knowledge Domain of the Academy of International Business Studies (AIB) Conferences: A Longitudinal Scientometric Perspective for the Years 2006-2011." Scientometrics, 95(2), 541-561.
Zhang, Y., and Jia, X. 2013. Republication of Conference Papers in Journals?" Learned Publishing, 26(3), 189-196.
- 다운로드 수
- 조회수
- 0KCI 피인용수
- 0WOS 피인용수