바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1225-598X
  • E-ISSN2982-6292

KOLIS-NET의 패싯 네비게이션 활용에 관한 연구

A Research on the Use of Faceted Navigation of KOLIS-NET

한국문헌정보학회지 / Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, (P)1225-598X; (E)2982-6292
2019, v.53 no.1, pp.109-132
https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2019.53.1.109
윤정옥 (청주대학교)

초록

The purpose of this study is to examine and propose to improve the features of a simple keyword search box and faceted navigations of KOLIS-NET operated by the National Library of Korea. A record group of ‘2011-2020 (776)’ under ‘Publication date’ facet, out of 3,702 records retrieved from a search of ‘김훈’, were examined. Major findings are as follows: (1) Five facets including ‘Format’, ‘Publication date’, ‘Subject’, ‘Language’ and ‘Country’ are used to limit search results only in the first step, and multiple facets cannot be simultaneously used; (2) With ‘Publication date’ facet formed in the span of ten years, a separate publication year cannot be identified; (3) ‘Subject’ facet based on KDC limits the results only in broad subject classes without sub-facets; (4) Under ‘Format’ facet, a special format such as large print texts cannot be identified; (5) Without ‘Author’ facet, authors cannot be identified; and (6) ‘Publication date missing’, ‘Language missing’, and ‘Miscellaneous subject’ record groups cannot be clicked and displayed, a navigation to-and-fro between a brief list and bibliographic records is not smooth, etc. Therefore an application of multiple facets in all stages of limiting the search result, a construction of sub-facets for ‘Publication date’ and ‘Subject’ facets, an accurate description and coding of ‘General Material Designation’, etc. are suggested to improve KOLIS-NET’s faceted navigation.

keywords
국가자료종합목록, 디스커버리 도구, 차세대 목록, 패싯 네비게이션, 종합목록, KOLIS-NET, Discovery tool, Next Generation Catalog, Facet navigation, Union catalog

참고문헌

1.

곽승진, 신재민, 김보영. 2016. 디스커버리 서비스의 비교 분석. 『한국비블리아학회지』, 27(4):5-20.

2.

국립중앙도서관. “260 발행, 배포, 간사 사항 (Publication, Distribution, etc. (Imprint)).” 『한국문헌자동화목록형식-통합서지용』. [online] [cited 2018. 7. 29.]<http://www.nl.go.kr/common/jsp/kormarc_2014/sub/250_28X_260.html>

3.

국립중앙도서관. 2018a. KOLIS-NET. 국가자료종합목록. “시스템 소개.” [online] [cited 2018. 7. 30.]<http://www.nl.go.kr/kolisnet/user/serviceInfo/systemIntro.do>

4.

국립중앙도서관. 2018b. KOLIS-NET. 국가자료종합목록. “협력기관.” [online] [cited 2018. 7. 31.]<http://www.nl.go.kr/kolisnet/user/serviceInfo/presentState.do>

5.

국립중앙도서관. 2018c. KOLIS-NET. 국가자료종합목록. “공지사항.” [online] [cited 2018. 7. 31.]<http://www.nl.go.kr/kolisnet/kolisNet_user/notice/detail.do>

6.

김선애, 이수상. 2006. KOLIS-NET 종합목록 DB의 품질평가. 『한국문헌정보학회지』, 40(1): 95-117.

7.

김영기, 이수상. 2006. KOLIS-NET의 시스템 평가에 관한 연구. 『정보관리학회지』, 23(1): 261-278.

8.

김우정, 이지원, 조용완. 2017. 대학도서관의 DVD자료 목록레코드 품질에 관한 연구. 『한국비블리아학회지』, 28(4): 77-100.

9.

노지현, 이수상. 2006. 분담편목에 대한 공공도서관의 인식과 참여 - 국가자료종합목록시스템(KOLIS-NET)을 중심으로. 『한국문헌정보학회지』, 40(2): 195-216.

10.

도태현, 정영미. 2013a. 대학도서관의 차세대 OPAC 기능 채택과 확산 현황. 『한국도서관·정보학회지』, 44(2): 197-215.

11.

도태현, 정영미. 2013b. 대학도서관의 차세대 OPAC 기능 수용 요인에 관한 연구. 『한국도서관·정보학회지』, 44(3): 471-488.

12.

심경. 2008. 차세대 도서관 목록의 사례(2): WorldCat Local. 『도서관문화』, 49(11): 54-61.

13.

유영준. 2011. 차세대 도서관 목록에서의 패싯 내비게이션에 관한 연구. 『정보관리학회지』, 28(3):13-30.

14.

유영준. 2013. 국내 대학도서관 OPAC의 패싯 내비게이션 분석에 관한 연구. 『정보관리학회지』, 30(2): 189-205.

15.

유영준. 2014. 공공도서관의 패싯 내비게이션에 관한 연구. 『한국도서관·정보학회지』, 45(1):339-358.

16.

한국도서관협회 목록위원회. 2003. 『韓國目錄規則』. 제4판. 서울: 한국도서관협회.

17.

Bilal, D. 2014. Library Automation: Core Concepts and Practical Systems Analysis. 3rd Ed. Santa Barbara, California: Libraries Unlimited.

18.

Breeding, M. 2004. “Integrated Library Software: A Guide to Multiuser, Multifunction Systems.” Library Technology Reports, 40(1): 1-42.

19.

Breeding, M. 2007. “Next Generation Catalog.” Library Technology Reports, 44(4): 1-42.

20.

Breeding, M. 2013. “3. Next-Generation Discovery: An Overview of the European Scene.”Catalogue 2.0: The Future of the Library Catalogue. Edited by Sally Chambers. London:Facet Publishing, 37-64.

21.

Caplan, P. 2012. “On Discovery Tools, OPACs and the Motion of Library Language.”Library Hi Tech, 30(1): 108-115. [online] [cited 2018. 7. 24.]<https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831211213247>

22.

Hider, P. 2012. Information Resource Description: Creating and Managing Metadata. London:Facet Publishing.

23.

Hofmann, M. A. and Yang, S. Q. 2011. “How Next-Gen R U? A Review of Academic OPACS in the United States and Canada.” Computers in Libraries, 31(6): 26-29.

24.

Nagy, A. 2011. “Defining the Next-Generation Catalog.” Library Technology Reports, 47(7):11-15.

25.

Yang, S. Q. and Hofmann, M. A. 2010. “The Next Generation Library Catalog: A Comparative Study of the OPACs of Koha, Evergreen, and Voyager.” Information Technology and Libraries, 29(3): 141-150.

26.

Yang, S. Q. and Wagner, K. 2010. “Evaluating and Comparing Discovery Tools: How Close Are We Towards Next Generation Catalog?” Library Hi Tech, 28(4): 690-709. [online][cited 2018. 7. 24.] <https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831011096312>

27.

Ward, J. L., Shadle, S. and Mofjeld, P. 2008. “WorldCat Local at the University of Washington Libraries.” Library Technology Reports, 44(6): 1-46.

한국문헌정보학회지