Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
- P-ISSN1225-598X
- E-ISSN2982-6292
Article Contents
- 2024 (Vol.58)
- 2023 (Vol.57)
- 2022 (Vol.56)
- 2021 (Vol.55)
- 2020 (Vol.54)
- 2019 (Vol.53)
- 2018 (Vol.52)
- 2017 (Vol.51)
- 2016 (Vol.50)
- 2015 (Vol.49)
- 2014 (Vol.48)
- 2013 (Vol.47)
- 2012 (Vol.46)
- 2011 (Vol.45)
- 2010 (Vol.44)
- 2009 (Vol.43)
- 2008 (Vol.42)
- 2007 (Vol.41)
- 2006 (Vol.40)
- 2005 (Vol.39)
- 2004 (Vol.38)
- 2003 (Vol.37)
- 2002 (Vol.36)
An Analysis of the Literature Sources of Sikuquanshuzongmoktiyao
Abstract
This study was conducted with a view to investigating and analyzing classification and types of literature sources of Sikuquanshuzongmutiyao and the results of this study are as follows. First, the literature sources of Sikuquanshuzongmutiyao were classified mainly into five types including national version, provincial version, individual version, public official version, and societal distribution version. Second, court and Emperor’s version was classified as national version, while literatures collected from state and province were classified as provincial version. Third, each of individual version and public official version, which were not clearly differentiated from each other due to their being named private version, were distinctively and separately classified. They were classified into individual version if associated by province name and book owners’ names and into public official version if associated by public post names and public official’s name. Fourth, societal distribution version included distributed and purchased versions in the society of those days. Fifth, in terms of the number of literature listed in all descriptions of Sikuquanshu, provincial version, national version, individual version, public official version, and societal distribution version were more found in the descending order. Sixth, it was found out that causes are being a little more stressed in the description of reference names of Sikuquanshuzongmutiyao through 1) public post names on public official version, 2) company names on private version, and 3) names of societal distribution version instead of sales version.
- keywords
- 사고전서, 사고전서총목, 사고전서총목제요, 문헌 출처, 저록, Sikuquanshu, Sikuquanshuzongmok, Sikuquanshuzongmotiyao, Literature Sources, Description
Reference
江庆柏. 2007. 四库全书私人呈送本中的家族本. 『图书馆杂志』, 26(1): 57-62.
江庆柏. 2008. 四库全书私人呈送本中的郑大节家藏本. 『图书馆工作与研究』, 6: 56-58.
郭伯赫 著, 王雲五 編. 1951. 『四庫全書纂修考』. 北京: 臺灣商務印書館印行.
杜澤遜. 2003. 『四庫』 底本與 『永樂大典』 遭焚探秘. 『中華讀書報』, 2月 26日.
罗琳. 2016. ““四库馆臣” 之重復.” 『文獻硏究新視野: 第四屆中國古典文獻學國際學術硏討會』, 台灣东吴大学, 5月20日-21日.
리상용. 2017. 『四庫全書總目提要』의 목록기술방식에 대한 연구. 『서지학연구』, 69: 267-286.
Baidu(百度百科). [online] [cited 2019. 3. 12.] <https://baike.baidu.com/>
樊美珍, 馮春生. 1995. 『四庫全書總目』 著錄底本來源統計. 『上海高校图书情报学刊』, 2: 54-55.
徐进, 宋月阳. 2018. 从 『四库全书』 私人进献本看清初私家藏书. 『图书馆界』, 3: 48-54.
孫文良. 2001. 『乾隆皇帝』. 臺北: 知書房出版社.
楊果霖. 2005. 『四庫全書總目提要』 著錄 ｢內府藏本｣ 硏究. 『醒吾學報』, 第29期: 73-90.
杨洪升. 2008. 『四库全书』 底本续考. 『聊城大学学报(社会科学版)』, 5: 65-69.
杨洪升. 2009. 『四库全书』 底本考. 『图书馆杂志』, 28(6): 71-75.
两淮盐商破败之局. 『中国经营报』. [online] [cited 2019. 3. 22.]<http://www.cb.com.cn/index/show/sd_m/cv/cv135103891319>
『永樂大典』的悲歡離合. 『人民日報』 2003年 9月 24日.
吴元. 2015. ≪四库全书≫ 官员献书群体考略. 『图书馆工作与研究』, 3: 70-75.
吳慰祖. 1960. 『四庫採進書目』. [臺北?]: 成文出版社.
Wikipedia(维基百科). [online] [cited 2019. 3. 12.]<https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:%E9%A6%96%E9%A1%B5>
张升. 2008. 四库全书的底本与稿本. 『图书情报工作』, 52(11): 143-146.
Chinabaike(中國百科網). [online] [cited 2019. 3. 14.] <http://www.chinabaike.com/>
韓非木 編, 沈㬂俊 譯. 1971. 『中國의 典籍』. 서울: 한국도서관협회.
Wikiwand. ‘江春’. [online] [cited 2019. 4. 2.]<https://www.wikiwand.com/zh-hk/%E6%B1%9F%E6%98%A5>
- Downloaded
- Viewed
- 0KCI Citations
- 0WOS Citations